- This topic has 200 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by
stansd.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 10, 2008 at 5:59 PM #134061January 10, 2008 at 8:20 PM #133852
svelteParticipantI’ll vote for Obama or Clinton, depending upon whose name shows up on the ballot (I’m an independent and don’t get to vote in the primaries). I think they are both qualified and if I see another wavy haired rich old white male in the oval office, I think I’ll get sick!
Besides, we’ve just went through the worst president in US history – anything has got to be better.
I’ve always said what TheBreeze has been preaching – a Dem on one side (Prez or congressional majority) and a Rep on the other. That way they can keep an eye on each other and we get more representative laws and budgets. But for the time being, I’ll take a Dem on both sides to try and erase some of the last decade.
Wifey, she’ll vote Democratic I guarantee you.
January 10, 2008 at 8:20 PM #134045svelteParticipantI’ll vote for Obama or Clinton, depending upon whose name shows up on the ballot (I’m an independent and don’t get to vote in the primaries). I think they are both qualified and if I see another wavy haired rich old white male in the oval office, I think I’ll get sick!
Besides, we’ve just went through the worst president in US history – anything has got to be better.
I’ve always said what TheBreeze has been preaching – a Dem on one side (Prez or congressional majority) and a Rep on the other. That way they can keep an eye on each other and we get more representative laws and budgets. But for the time being, I’ll take a Dem on both sides to try and erase some of the last decade.
Wifey, she’ll vote Democratic I guarantee you.
January 10, 2008 at 8:20 PM #134053svelteParticipantI’ll vote for Obama or Clinton, depending upon whose name shows up on the ballot (I’m an independent and don’t get to vote in the primaries). I think they are both qualified and if I see another wavy haired rich old white male in the oval office, I think I’ll get sick!
Besides, we’ve just went through the worst president in US history – anything has got to be better.
I’ve always said what TheBreeze has been preaching – a Dem on one side (Prez or congressional majority) and a Rep on the other. That way they can keep an eye on each other and we get more representative laws and budgets. But for the time being, I’ll take a Dem on both sides to try and erase some of the last decade.
Wifey, she’ll vote Democratic I guarantee you.
January 10, 2008 at 8:20 PM #134109svelteParticipantI’ll vote for Obama or Clinton, depending upon whose name shows up on the ballot (I’m an independent and don’t get to vote in the primaries). I think they are both qualified and if I see another wavy haired rich old white male in the oval office, I think I’ll get sick!
Besides, we’ve just went through the worst president in US history – anything has got to be better.
I’ve always said what TheBreeze has been preaching – a Dem on one side (Prez or congressional majority) and a Rep on the other. That way they can keep an eye on each other and we get more representative laws and budgets. But for the time being, I’ll take a Dem on both sides to try and erase some of the last decade.
Wifey, she’ll vote Democratic I guarantee you.
January 10, 2008 at 8:20 PM #134149svelteParticipantI’ll vote for Obama or Clinton, depending upon whose name shows up on the ballot (I’m an independent and don’t get to vote in the primaries). I think they are both qualified and if I see another wavy haired rich old white male in the oval office, I think I’ll get sick!
Besides, we’ve just went through the worst president in US history – anything has got to be better.
I’ve always said what TheBreeze has been preaching – a Dem on one side (Prez or congressional majority) and a Rep on the other. That way they can keep an eye on each other and we get more representative laws and budgets. But for the time being, I’ll take a Dem on both sides to try and erase some of the last decade.
Wifey, she’ll vote Democratic I guarantee you.
January 10, 2008 at 8:31 PM #133857no_such_reality
ParticipantVoting for Paul in the Primary. That’s the loudest message I can send to the Republicans to return to their fiscal roots.
On the props: no.
No on the Indian gaming. $14Billion over 20 years is a pittance compared to the costs the gaming drives into our communities.
No on the term limits which is really a rollback of term limits from 2 terms in either house to up to 6 terms in the Assembley and 3 in the Senate.
No on the bonds. No on the taxes.
January 10, 2008 at 8:31 PM #134050ParticipantVoting for Paul in the Primary. That’s the loudest message I can send to the Republicans to return to their fiscal roots.
On the props: no.
No on the Indian gaming. $14Billion over 20 years is a pittance compared to the costs the gaming drives into our communities.
No on the term limits which is really a rollback of term limits from 2 terms in either house to up to 6 terms in the Assembley and 3 in the Senate.
No on the bonds. No on the taxes.
January 10, 2008 at 8:31 PM #134058ParticipantVoting for Paul in the Primary. That’s the loudest message I can send to the Republicans to return to their fiscal roots.
On the props: no.
No on the Indian gaming. $14Billion over 20 years is a pittance compared to the costs the gaming drives into our communities.
No on the term limits which is really a rollback of term limits from 2 terms in either house to up to 6 terms in the Assembley and 3 in the Senate.
No on the bonds. No on the taxes.
January 10, 2008 at 8:31 PM #134114ParticipantVoting for Paul in the Primary. That’s the loudest message I can send to the Republicans to return to their fiscal roots.
On the props: no.
No on the Indian gaming. $14Billion over 20 years is a pittance compared to the costs the gaming drives into our communities.
No on the term limits which is really a rollback of term limits from 2 terms in either house to up to 6 terms in the Assembley and 3 in the Senate.
No on the bonds. No on the taxes.
January 10, 2008 at 8:31 PM #134154ParticipantVoting for Paul in the Primary. That’s the loudest message I can send to the Republicans to return to their fiscal roots.
On the props: no.
No on the Indian gaming. $14Billion over 20 years is a pittance compared to the costs the gaming drives into our communities.
No on the term limits which is really a rollback of term limits from 2 terms in either house to up to 6 terms in the Assembley and 3 in the Senate.
No on the bonds. No on the taxes.
January 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM #133879Anonymous
GuestSvelte: you CAN vote in the primary this Feb. 5th. The California Democratic Party will allow you to vote in their primary. Not the Republics, no. Read your voter guide that you should have received recently.
January 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM #134070GuestSvelte: you CAN vote in the primary this Feb. 5th. The California Democratic Party will allow you to vote in their primary. Not the Republics, no. Read your voter guide that you should have received recently.
January 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM #134078GuestSvelte: you CAN vote in the primary this Feb. 5th. The California Democratic Party will allow you to vote in their primary. Not the Republics, no. Read your voter guide that you should have received recently.
January 10, 2008 at 8:56 PM #134134GuestSvelte: you CAN vote in the primary this Feb. 5th. The California Democratic Party will allow you to vote in their primary. Not the Republics, no. Read your voter guide that you should have received recently.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.