- This topic has 150 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by
jimmyle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 12, 2010 at 4:33 PM #550663May 12, 2010 at 4:46 PM #549685
briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
If google is profitable and wants to spend their own shareholder’s money to do this, sure…But let’s not forget, government is not for profit.[/quote]
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a statement from Google condemning the Arizona immigration law.
The pressure on Arizona will only continue to mount.
And like you said, flu, press coverage of the Arizona law will lead to changes.
May 12, 2010 at 4:46 PM #549796briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
If google is profitable and wants to spend their own shareholder’s money to do this, sure…But let’s not forget, government is not for profit.[/quote]
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a statement from Google condemning the Arizona immigration law.
The pressure on Arizona will only continue to mount.
And like you said, flu, press coverage of the Arizona law will lead to changes.
May 12, 2010 at 4:46 PM #550290briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
If google is profitable and wants to spend their own shareholder’s money to do this, sure…But let’s not forget, government is not for profit.[/quote]
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a statement from Google condemning the Arizona immigration law.
The pressure on Arizona will only continue to mount.
And like you said, flu, press coverage of the Arizona law will lead to changes.
May 12, 2010 at 4:46 PM #550390briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
If google is profitable and wants to spend their own shareholder’s money to do this, sure…But let’s not forget, government is not for profit.[/quote]
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a statement from Google condemning the Arizona immigration law.
The pressure on Arizona will only continue to mount.
And like you said, flu, press coverage of the Arizona law will lead to changes.
May 12, 2010 at 4:46 PM #550668briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
If google is profitable and wants to spend their own shareholder’s money to do this, sure…But let’s not forget, government is not for profit.[/quote]
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a statement from Google condemning the Arizona immigration law.
The pressure on Arizona will only continue to mount.
And like you said, flu, press coverage of the Arizona law will lead to changes.
May 12, 2010 at 5:18 PM #549690afx114
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Shouldn’t they be cutting budgets or something.[/quote]
Doesn’t ending trips to Arizona save money?
May 12, 2010 at 5:18 PM #549801afx114
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Shouldn’t they be cutting budgets or something.[/quote]
Doesn’t ending trips to Arizona save money?
May 12, 2010 at 5:18 PM #550296afx114
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Shouldn’t they be cutting budgets or something.[/quote]
Doesn’t ending trips to Arizona save money?
May 12, 2010 at 5:18 PM #550395afx114
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Shouldn’t they be cutting budgets or something.[/quote]
Doesn’t ending trips to Arizona save money?
May 12, 2010 at 5:18 PM #550673afx114
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Shouldn’t they be cutting budgets or something.[/quote]
Doesn’t ending trips to Arizona save money?
May 12, 2010 at 5:35 PM #549695an
ParticipantI wonder if those who support Arizona law would boycott SF, LA, SD in retaliation?
May 12, 2010 at 5:35 PM #549806an
ParticipantI wonder if those who support Arizona law would boycott SF, LA, SD in retaliation?
May 12, 2010 at 5:35 PM #550301an
ParticipantI wonder if those who support Arizona law would boycott SF, LA, SD in retaliation?
May 12, 2010 at 5:35 PM #550400an
ParticipantI wonder if those who support Arizona law would boycott SF, LA, SD in retaliation?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.