- This topic has 195 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by mydogsarelazy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 21, 2010 at 1:16 PM #569294June 21, 2010 at 1:37 PM #568323WerewolfParticipant
Union Tribune was sold to Platinum Equity, a private equity firm out of LA.
Welcome to the new, new economy where you work for innovative PE folks who innovate by canning the workforce and keeping the money.
June 21, 2010 at 1:37 PM #568417WerewolfParticipantUnion Tribune was sold to Platinum Equity, a private equity firm out of LA.
Welcome to the new, new economy where you work for innovative PE folks who innovate by canning the workforce and keeping the money.
June 21, 2010 at 1:37 PM #568922WerewolfParticipantUnion Tribune was sold to Platinum Equity, a private equity firm out of LA.
Welcome to the new, new economy where you work for innovative PE folks who innovate by canning the workforce and keeping the money.
June 21, 2010 at 1:37 PM #569029WerewolfParticipantUnion Tribune was sold to Platinum Equity, a private equity firm out of LA.
Welcome to the new, new economy where you work for innovative PE folks who innovate by canning the workforce and keeping the money.
June 21, 2010 at 1:37 PM #569314WerewolfParticipantUnion Tribune was sold to Platinum Equity, a private equity firm out of LA.
Welcome to the new, new economy where you work for innovative PE folks who innovate by canning the workforce and keeping the money.
June 21, 2010 at 1:50 PM #568348DWCAPParticipantActually, of the ‘new’ media I like Rich’s “Voice of San Diego”. Their fact check part is kinda (ha!) dry, but I think it keeps politicans honest. I remember they even had some Union member who mispoke and self reported herself as mis-speaking before they did rather than be caught being wrong. They usually call that ‘getting out ahead of it’, but atleast she admitted she was wrong publically. ANd she was forced to in a way that people actually heard about, she couldnt hide her recant.
I like that. We all heard the wrong information, and then wonder why it keeps circling when it is wrong.
Plus their pieces about lcoal San Diego are far better than the UT stuff. Add that to Kellys writing, and ofcourse Rich’s, and well, Forget the UT.
June 21, 2010 at 1:50 PM #568442DWCAPParticipantActually, of the ‘new’ media I like Rich’s “Voice of San Diego”. Their fact check part is kinda (ha!) dry, but I think it keeps politicans honest. I remember they even had some Union member who mispoke and self reported herself as mis-speaking before they did rather than be caught being wrong. They usually call that ‘getting out ahead of it’, but atleast she admitted she was wrong publically. ANd she was forced to in a way that people actually heard about, she couldnt hide her recant.
I like that. We all heard the wrong information, and then wonder why it keeps circling when it is wrong.
Plus their pieces about lcoal San Diego are far better than the UT stuff. Add that to Kellys writing, and ofcourse Rich’s, and well, Forget the UT.
June 21, 2010 at 1:50 PM #568947DWCAPParticipantActually, of the ‘new’ media I like Rich’s “Voice of San Diego”. Their fact check part is kinda (ha!) dry, but I think it keeps politicans honest. I remember they even had some Union member who mispoke and self reported herself as mis-speaking before they did rather than be caught being wrong. They usually call that ‘getting out ahead of it’, but atleast she admitted she was wrong publically. ANd she was forced to in a way that people actually heard about, she couldnt hide her recant.
I like that. We all heard the wrong information, and then wonder why it keeps circling when it is wrong.
Plus their pieces about lcoal San Diego are far better than the UT stuff. Add that to Kellys writing, and ofcourse Rich’s, and well, Forget the UT.
June 21, 2010 at 1:50 PM #569054DWCAPParticipantActually, of the ‘new’ media I like Rich’s “Voice of San Diego”. Their fact check part is kinda (ha!) dry, but I think it keeps politicans honest. I remember they even had some Union member who mispoke and self reported herself as mis-speaking before they did rather than be caught being wrong. They usually call that ‘getting out ahead of it’, but atleast she admitted she was wrong publically. ANd she was forced to in a way that people actually heard about, she couldnt hide her recant.
I like that. We all heard the wrong information, and then wonder why it keeps circling when it is wrong.
Plus their pieces about lcoal San Diego are far better than the UT stuff. Add that to Kellys writing, and ofcourse Rich’s, and well, Forget the UT.
June 21, 2010 at 1:50 PM #569339DWCAPParticipantActually, of the ‘new’ media I like Rich’s “Voice of San Diego”. Their fact check part is kinda (ha!) dry, but I think it keeps politicans honest. I remember they even had some Union member who mispoke and self reported herself as mis-speaking before they did rather than be caught being wrong. They usually call that ‘getting out ahead of it’, but atleast she admitted she was wrong publically. ANd she was forced to in a way that people actually heard about, she couldnt hide her recant.
I like that. We all heard the wrong information, and then wonder why it keeps circling when it is wrong.
Plus their pieces about lcoal San Diego are far better than the UT stuff. Add that to Kellys writing, and ofcourse Rich’s, and well, Forget the UT.
June 21, 2010 at 1:56 PM #568357nattyParticipantwhat exactly is the cataclysmic change that is taking place?
Is traditional print media dying? Sure, easy to notice. UT has been natural resource waste for a decade plus. This failure can be attributed to many factors.
Using Watergate as the benchmark of journalism states only that this specific reporting was confirmed after the event to be revealed as truth. Such a given journalistic stamp of approval is not difficult to find the past 100yrs.
The difference between now vs.’then'(any day past 100yrs), a reader is equipped with more tools to qualify words written/spoken at increased rate of time.
A ‘reporter’ defines nothing, for me. Never has. A person who provides information on a given subject or story–whatever the topic–and proves to be truth for me, the reporting individual has a ‘leg up’, but is not beyond my own ‘fact checking’-should I feel the need.
June 21, 2010 at 1:56 PM #568452nattyParticipantwhat exactly is the cataclysmic change that is taking place?
Is traditional print media dying? Sure, easy to notice. UT has been natural resource waste for a decade plus. This failure can be attributed to many factors.
Using Watergate as the benchmark of journalism states only that this specific reporting was confirmed after the event to be revealed as truth. Such a given journalistic stamp of approval is not difficult to find the past 100yrs.
The difference between now vs.’then'(any day past 100yrs), a reader is equipped with more tools to qualify words written/spoken at increased rate of time.
A ‘reporter’ defines nothing, for me. Never has. A person who provides information on a given subject or story–whatever the topic–and proves to be truth for me, the reporting individual has a ‘leg up’, but is not beyond my own ‘fact checking’-should I feel the need.
June 21, 2010 at 1:56 PM #568957nattyParticipantwhat exactly is the cataclysmic change that is taking place?
Is traditional print media dying? Sure, easy to notice. UT has been natural resource waste for a decade plus. This failure can be attributed to many factors.
Using Watergate as the benchmark of journalism states only that this specific reporting was confirmed after the event to be revealed as truth. Such a given journalistic stamp of approval is not difficult to find the past 100yrs.
The difference between now vs.’then'(any day past 100yrs), a reader is equipped with more tools to qualify words written/spoken at increased rate of time.
A ‘reporter’ defines nothing, for me. Never has. A person who provides information on a given subject or story–whatever the topic–and proves to be truth for me, the reporting individual has a ‘leg up’, but is not beyond my own ‘fact checking’-should I feel the need.
June 21, 2010 at 1:56 PM #569064nattyParticipantwhat exactly is the cataclysmic change that is taking place?
Is traditional print media dying? Sure, easy to notice. UT has been natural resource waste for a decade plus. This failure can be attributed to many factors.
Using Watergate as the benchmark of journalism states only that this specific reporting was confirmed after the event to be revealed as truth. Such a given journalistic stamp of approval is not difficult to find the past 100yrs.
The difference between now vs.’then'(any day past 100yrs), a reader is equipped with more tools to qualify words written/spoken at increased rate of time.
A ‘reporter’ defines nothing, for me. Never has. A person who provides information on a given subject or story–whatever the topic–and proves to be truth for me, the reporting individual has a ‘leg up’, but is not beyond my own ‘fact checking’-should I feel the need.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.