- This topic has 250 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 6, 2009 at 5:53 PM #491762December 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM #490901Diego MamaniParticipant
[quote=davelj]while receiving nothing of equal value in return[/quote]
Are you kidding? You are buying an option! Anthropology is a great field, but you need to talk to an economist about things of value (they are fellow social scientists, after all).
What really bothers me is that women still expect to receive diamonds, even though we know that the diamond trade generates a whole deal of violence in Africa. Teenaged boys (sometimes women and girls too) are mutilated or killed, entire populations are displaced, weak governments finally collapse and chaos ensues, etc., etc.
Isn’t it time girls say, “hey, to hell with tradition, I don’t want a gift that causes so much blooshed”?
December 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM #491067Diego MamaniParticipant[quote=davelj]while receiving nothing of equal value in return[/quote]
Are you kidding? You are buying an option! Anthropology is a great field, but you need to talk to an economist about things of value (they are fellow social scientists, after all).
What really bothers me is that women still expect to receive diamonds, even though we know that the diamond trade generates a whole deal of violence in Africa. Teenaged boys (sometimes women and girls too) are mutilated or killed, entire populations are displaced, weak governments finally collapse and chaos ensues, etc., etc.
Isn’t it time girls say, “hey, to hell with tradition, I don’t want a gift that causes so much blooshed”?
December 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM #491449Diego MamaniParticipant[quote=davelj]while receiving nothing of equal value in return[/quote]
Are you kidding? You are buying an option! Anthropology is a great field, but you need to talk to an economist about things of value (they are fellow social scientists, after all).
What really bothers me is that women still expect to receive diamonds, even though we know that the diamond trade generates a whole deal of violence in Africa. Teenaged boys (sometimes women and girls too) are mutilated or killed, entire populations are displaced, weak governments finally collapse and chaos ensues, etc., etc.
Isn’t it time girls say, “hey, to hell with tradition, I don’t want a gift that causes so much blooshed”?
December 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM #491538Diego MamaniParticipant[quote=davelj]while receiving nothing of equal value in return[/quote]
Are you kidding? You are buying an option! Anthropology is a great field, but you need to talk to an economist about things of value (they are fellow social scientists, after all).
What really bothers me is that women still expect to receive diamonds, even though we know that the diamond trade generates a whole deal of violence in Africa. Teenaged boys (sometimes women and girls too) are mutilated or killed, entire populations are displaced, weak governments finally collapse and chaos ensues, etc., etc.
Isn’t it time girls say, “hey, to hell with tradition, I don’t want a gift that causes so much blooshed”?
December 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM #491772Diego MamaniParticipant[quote=davelj]while receiving nothing of equal value in return[/quote]
Are you kidding? You are buying an option! Anthropology is a great field, but you need to talk to an economist about things of value (they are fellow social scientists, after all).
What really bothers me is that women still expect to receive diamonds, even though we know that the diamond trade generates a whole deal of violence in Africa. Teenaged boys (sometimes women and girls too) are mutilated or killed, entire populations are displaced, weak governments finally collapse and chaos ensues, etc., etc.
Isn’t it time girls say, “hey, to hell with tradition, I don’t want a gift that causes so much blooshed”?
December 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM #490921scaredyclassicParticipanta big gold brick would be a much better marriage gift than a diamond. More desirable brides would get bigger bricks.
December 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM #491087scaredyclassicParticipanta big gold brick would be a much better marriage gift than a diamond. More desirable brides would get bigger bricks.
December 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM #491469scaredyclassicParticipanta big gold brick would be a much better marriage gift than a diamond. More desirable brides would get bigger bricks.
December 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM #491558scaredyclassicParticipanta big gold brick would be a much better marriage gift than a diamond. More desirable brides would get bigger bricks.
December 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM #491792scaredyclassicParticipanta big gold brick would be a much better marriage gift than a diamond. More desirable brides would get bigger bricks.
December 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM #490976UCGalParticipantI offered to buy one for my husband. He declined.
He did accept the fact that I wanted a sapphire rather than a diamond (my birthstone is sapphire.) It was WAAAY cheaper because of this. (We knew we were going to get married from about date 3 or 4… Just waited a decent time to make sure.)I would have been fine with no ring. That said – I wear my engagement ring fulltime… It’s silly sentimental. I’ve been wearing it for more than 10 years. It’s stupid, but it reminds me of our bond every time I look at it. Sappy, I know. And I’m not the sappy type.
I’m curious Dave… how old are you?
My husband was a lifelong bachelor… He was 47 when we got married. He’d never been married… never fully committed to living with anyone prior – although he’d been “virtually” living with 2 long term girlfriends prior to me. (Serially, not parallel)I was reasonably content being single too – I was 38 when we got married – first marriage for me. I’d wanted kids – but had pretty much put that aside by the time I met my husband.
We both had comfortable, happy lives as single people prior to marriage. That said – we’re happy together… although there’s less freedom post kids. But our kids are great and we have no regrets.
Dogs can learn new tricks… You never know. LOL.
December 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM #491142UCGalParticipantI offered to buy one for my husband. He declined.
He did accept the fact that I wanted a sapphire rather than a diamond (my birthstone is sapphire.) It was WAAAY cheaper because of this. (We knew we were going to get married from about date 3 or 4… Just waited a decent time to make sure.)I would have been fine with no ring. That said – I wear my engagement ring fulltime… It’s silly sentimental. I’ve been wearing it for more than 10 years. It’s stupid, but it reminds me of our bond every time I look at it. Sappy, I know. And I’m not the sappy type.
I’m curious Dave… how old are you?
My husband was a lifelong bachelor… He was 47 when we got married. He’d never been married… never fully committed to living with anyone prior – although he’d been “virtually” living with 2 long term girlfriends prior to me. (Serially, not parallel)I was reasonably content being single too – I was 38 when we got married – first marriage for me. I’d wanted kids – but had pretty much put that aside by the time I met my husband.
We both had comfortable, happy lives as single people prior to marriage. That said – we’re happy together… although there’s less freedom post kids. But our kids are great and we have no regrets.
Dogs can learn new tricks… You never know. LOL.
December 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM #491524UCGalParticipantI offered to buy one for my husband. He declined.
He did accept the fact that I wanted a sapphire rather than a diamond (my birthstone is sapphire.) It was WAAAY cheaper because of this. (We knew we were going to get married from about date 3 or 4… Just waited a decent time to make sure.)I would have been fine with no ring. That said – I wear my engagement ring fulltime… It’s silly sentimental. I’ve been wearing it for more than 10 years. It’s stupid, but it reminds me of our bond every time I look at it. Sappy, I know. And I’m not the sappy type.
I’m curious Dave… how old are you?
My husband was a lifelong bachelor… He was 47 when we got married. He’d never been married… never fully committed to living with anyone prior – although he’d been “virtually” living with 2 long term girlfriends prior to me. (Serially, not parallel)I was reasonably content being single too – I was 38 when we got married – first marriage for me. I’d wanted kids – but had pretty much put that aside by the time I met my husband.
We both had comfortable, happy lives as single people prior to marriage. That said – we’re happy together… although there’s less freedom post kids. But our kids are great and we have no regrets.
Dogs can learn new tricks… You never know. LOL.
December 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM #491613UCGalParticipantI offered to buy one for my husband. He declined.
He did accept the fact that I wanted a sapphire rather than a diamond (my birthstone is sapphire.) It was WAAAY cheaper because of this. (We knew we were going to get married from about date 3 or 4… Just waited a decent time to make sure.)I would have been fine with no ring. That said – I wear my engagement ring fulltime… It’s silly sentimental. I’ve been wearing it for more than 10 years. It’s stupid, but it reminds me of our bond every time I look at it. Sappy, I know. And I’m not the sappy type.
I’m curious Dave… how old are you?
My husband was a lifelong bachelor… He was 47 when we got married. He’d never been married… never fully committed to living with anyone prior – although he’d been “virtually” living with 2 long term girlfriends prior to me. (Serially, not parallel)I was reasonably content being single too – I was 38 when we got married – first marriage for me. I’d wanted kids – but had pretty much put that aside by the time I met my husband.
We both had comfortable, happy lives as single people prior to marriage. That said – we’re happy together… although there’s less freedom post kids. But our kids are great and we have no regrets.
Dogs can learn new tricks… You never know. LOL.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.