Regarding what turns on my wife about me – it’s not my body. Although I do still try to keep myself in shape. I know that if I want a good life (sex, companionship, respect, enjoyable time together) with my wife then I need to show not only affection physically and verbally toward her but more importantly with my actions. What have I done for her lately ?
It’s often doing things for her that I don’t even see the importance of. And when she sees that I am trying to change my habits or behaviors for her sake – and not my own – then that pleases her. There’s pleasing your spouse and then there’s pleasing your marriage – and that’s learning how to compromise. Not on everything but on the big things. So that you – she and I – function as a team.
(Sorry, I got a little off track in my own thoughts. 🙂
This thread is absurd. The idea that men should not be attracted by, and pursue, women who have physical attributes they find attractive is one of the dumbest things anyone ever said. It certainly is not sleazy.
What exactly do you mean by “luscious” anyway? If that is code for “large” then just be glad you found a guy who “likes you the way you are”. At least he didn’t buy you a treadmill for your birthday, right?
Marion, to even come up with such a question you must have seriously overdosed on politically correct ideology. Try replacing it with some science:
PS Lykis is more right than wrong on just about every topic he covers.
This thread is absurd. The idea that men should not be attracted by, and pursue, women who have physical attributes they find attractive is one of the dumbest things anyone ever said. It certainly is not sleazy.
What exactly do you mean by “luscious” anyway? If that is code for “large” then just be glad you found a guy who “likes you the way you are”. At least he didn’t buy you a treadmill for your birthday, right?
Marion, to even come up with such a question you must have seriously overdosed on politically correct ideology. Try replacing it with some science:
PS Lykis is more right than wrong on just about every topic he covers.
This thread is absurd. The idea that men should not be attracted by, and pursue, women who have physical attributes they find attractive is one of the dumbest things anyone ever said. It certainly is not sleazy.
What exactly do you mean by “luscious” anyway? If that is code for “large” then just be glad you found a guy who “likes you the way you are”. At least he didn’t buy you a treadmill for your birthday, right?
Marion, to even come up with such a question you must have seriously overdosed on politically correct ideology. Try replacing it with some science:
PS Lykis is more right than wrong on just about every topic he covers.
This thread is absurd. The idea that men should not be attracted by, and pursue, women who have physical attributes they find attractive is one of the dumbest things anyone ever said. It certainly is not sleazy.
What exactly do you mean by “luscious” anyway? If that is code for “large” then just be glad you found a guy who “likes you the way you are”. At least he didn’t buy you a treadmill for your birthday, right?
Marion, to even come up with such a question you must have seriously overdosed on politically correct ideology. Try replacing it with some science:
PS Lykis is more right than wrong on just about every topic he covers.
This thread is absurd. The idea that men should not be attracted by, and pursue, women who have physical attributes they find attractive is one of the dumbest things anyone ever said. It certainly is not sleazy.
What exactly do you mean by “luscious” anyway? If that is code for “large” then just be glad you found a guy who “likes you the way you are”. At least he didn’t buy you a treadmill for your birthday, right?
Marion, to even come up with such a question you must have seriously overdosed on politically correct ideology. Try replacing it with some science:
PS Lykis is more right than wrong on just about every topic he covers.
