- This topic has 120 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
Raybyrnes.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 18, 2008 at 3:18 PM #242444July 18, 2008 at 3:19 PM #242226
Eugene
Participantesmith, no doubt crap interior. EVO and WRX STI aren’t exactly built for aesthetic reasons.
Crap interior is specific to EVO IX. Prev-gen WRX STI was decent looking. The OEM shifter is too long but I think that’s curable. If I had gotten a warmer reception in Bob Baker Subaru in Carlsbad last October, I’d be a driving a STI instead of a Beemer. (Is that good English?)
EVO X looked good on pictures, too.
July 18, 2008 at 3:19 PM #242368Eugene
Participantesmith, no doubt crap interior. EVO and WRX STI aren’t exactly built for aesthetic reasons.
Crap interior is specific to EVO IX. Prev-gen WRX STI was decent looking. The OEM shifter is too long but I think that’s curable. If I had gotten a warmer reception in Bob Baker Subaru in Carlsbad last October, I’d be a driving a STI instead of a Beemer. (Is that good English?)
EVO X looked good on pictures, too.
July 18, 2008 at 3:19 PM #242376Eugene
Participantesmith, no doubt crap interior. EVO and WRX STI aren’t exactly built for aesthetic reasons.
Crap interior is specific to EVO IX. Prev-gen WRX STI was decent looking. The OEM shifter is too long but I think that’s curable. If I had gotten a warmer reception in Bob Baker Subaru in Carlsbad last October, I’d be a driving a STI instead of a Beemer. (Is that good English?)
EVO X looked good on pictures, too.
July 18, 2008 at 3:19 PM #242432Eugene
Participantesmith, no doubt crap interior. EVO and WRX STI aren’t exactly built for aesthetic reasons.
Crap interior is specific to EVO IX. Prev-gen WRX STI was decent looking. The OEM shifter is too long but I think that’s curable. If I had gotten a warmer reception in Bob Baker Subaru in Carlsbad last October, I’d be a driving a STI instead of a Beemer. (Is that good English?)
EVO X looked good on pictures, too.
July 18, 2008 at 3:19 PM #242439Eugene
Participantesmith, no doubt crap interior. EVO and WRX STI aren’t exactly built for aesthetic reasons.
Crap interior is specific to EVO IX. Prev-gen WRX STI was decent looking. The OEM shifter is too long but I think that’s curable. If I had gotten a warmer reception in Bob Baker Subaru in Carlsbad last October, I’d be a driving a STI instead of a Beemer. (Is that good English?)
EVO X looked good on pictures, too.
July 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM #242241Coronita
Participant[quote]FLU, I do noticed the turbo trend and I’m cheering it every step of the way. Benz already announced that they’ll be replacing all their engine with turbo variant w/in 2.5 years. Ford is announcing they’re replacing their F150 engines with a 2.5L I4 turbo making 260HP and 300 ft-lb of tq and 3.5L V6 TT making 350HP and 390 ft-lb of tq.[/quote]
You won’t be if after a few years of ownership, not running synthetic, and not letting your turbo cool down before shutting down. Trust me on that one. Not that I’ve had a problem with oil coking on my own car (because I do run full synthetic, change every 5k miles AND run a turbo timer that lets things idle for 2 minutes while I’m not there), it will happen more or less.
What’s funny is that apparently audi is planning to use a supercharger on the next S4/S5, and not turbos. Perhaps too many problems with the biturbo in the first generation S4.
July 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM #242383Coronita
Participant[quote]FLU, I do noticed the turbo trend and I’m cheering it every step of the way. Benz already announced that they’ll be replacing all their engine with turbo variant w/in 2.5 years. Ford is announcing they’re replacing their F150 engines with a 2.5L I4 turbo making 260HP and 300 ft-lb of tq and 3.5L V6 TT making 350HP and 390 ft-lb of tq.[/quote]
You won’t be if after a few years of ownership, not running synthetic, and not letting your turbo cool down before shutting down. Trust me on that one. Not that I’ve had a problem with oil coking on my own car (because I do run full synthetic, change every 5k miles AND run a turbo timer that lets things idle for 2 minutes while I’m not there), it will happen more or less.
What’s funny is that apparently audi is planning to use a supercharger on the next S4/S5, and not turbos. Perhaps too many problems with the biturbo in the first generation S4.
July 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM #242391Coronita
Participant[quote]FLU, I do noticed the turbo trend and I’m cheering it every step of the way. Benz already announced that they’ll be replacing all their engine with turbo variant w/in 2.5 years. Ford is announcing they’re replacing their F150 engines with a 2.5L I4 turbo making 260HP and 300 ft-lb of tq and 3.5L V6 TT making 350HP and 390 ft-lb of tq.[/quote]
You won’t be if after a few years of ownership, not running synthetic, and not letting your turbo cool down before shutting down. Trust me on that one. Not that I’ve had a problem with oil coking on my own car (because I do run full synthetic, change every 5k miles AND run a turbo timer that lets things idle for 2 minutes while I’m not there), it will happen more or less.
What’s funny is that apparently audi is planning to use a supercharger on the next S4/S5, and not turbos. Perhaps too many problems with the biturbo in the first generation S4.
July 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM #242447Coronita
Participant[quote]FLU, I do noticed the turbo trend and I’m cheering it every step of the way. Benz already announced that they’ll be replacing all their engine with turbo variant w/in 2.5 years. Ford is announcing they’re replacing their F150 engines with a 2.5L I4 turbo making 260HP and 300 ft-lb of tq and 3.5L V6 TT making 350HP and 390 ft-lb of tq.[/quote]
You won’t be if after a few years of ownership, not running synthetic, and not letting your turbo cool down before shutting down. Trust me on that one. Not that I’ve had a problem with oil coking on my own car (because I do run full synthetic, change every 5k miles AND run a turbo timer that lets things idle for 2 minutes while I’m not there), it will happen more or less.
What’s funny is that apparently audi is planning to use a supercharger on the next S4/S5, and not turbos. Perhaps too many problems with the biturbo in the first generation S4.
July 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM #242454Coronita
Participant[quote]FLU, I do noticed the turbo trend and I’m cheering it every step of the way. Benz already announced that they’ll be replacing all their engine with turbo variant w/in 2.5 years. Ford is announcing they’re replacing their F150 engines with a 2.5L I4 turbo making 260HP and 300 ft-lb of tq and 3.5L V6 TT making 350HP and 390 ft-lb of tq.[/quote]
You won’t be if after a few years of ownership, not running synthetic, and not letting your turbo cool down before shutting down. Trust me on that one. Not that I’ve had a problem with oil coking on my own car (because I do run full synthetic, change every 5k miles AND run a turbo timer that lets things idle for 2 minutes while I’m not there), it will happen more or less.
What’s funny is that apparently audi is planning to use a supercharger on the next S4/S5, and not turbos. Perhaps too many problems with the biturbo in the first generation S4.
July 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM #242257an
Participant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]
You won’t be if after a few years of ownership, not running synthetic, and not letting your turbo cool down before shutting down. Trust me on that one. Not that I’ve had a problem with oil coking on my own car (because I do run full synthetic, change every 5k miles AND run a turbo timer that lets things idle for 2 minutes while I’m not there), it will happen more or less.What’s funny is that apparently audi is planning to use a supercharger on the next S4/S5, and not turbos. Perhaps too many problems with the biturbo in the first generation S4.
[/quote]
I’m already using full synthetic for my G35 and changing oil every 4k miles. I know with turbo comes more care, but I can deal with that for the extra potential. I would get a turbo timer and a oil cooler if I get a turbo car anyways, so the reliability shouldn’t be too much of an issue.BTW, there’s a new car wash/auto spa place that just open up in Sorrento Valley that uses Royal Purple. They’re charging $60-$65 for up to 6 quart of Royal Purple + a free car wash. I think that’s a pretty good deal considering Royal Purple goes for at least $6/quart and a car wash is $10.
I read about the new S4/S5 going with supercharger and I don’t like that decision. Problems with their old S4 shouldn’t be blame on the turbo but more of the engineering behind it. I never hear too much complaint from the Supra/Z/EVO/STI crowd regarding reliability, so I have to assume it’s more of an Audi problem and not turbo problem. It could also be the type of buyers as well. Supra/Z/EVO/STI buyers might know more about cars and not whine when something happen while S4 drivers might be more whiny to Audi. Who knows…
July 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM #242398an
Participant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]
You won’t be if after a few years of ownership, not running synthetic, and not letting your turbo cool down before shutting down. Trust me on that one. Not that I’ve had a problem with oil coking on my own car (because I do run full synthetic, change every 5k miles AND run a turbo timer that lets things idle for 2 minutes while I’m not there), it will happen more or less.What’s funny is that apparently audi is planning to use a supercharger on the next S4/S5, and not turbos. Perhaps too many problems with the biturbo in the first generation S4.
[/quote]
I’m already using full synthetic for my G35 and changing oil every 4k miles. I know with turbo comes more care, but I can deal with that for the extra potential. I would get a turbo timer and a oil cooler if I get a turbo car anyways, so the reliability shouldn’t be too much of an issue.BTW, there’s a new car wash/auto spa place that just open up in Sorrento Valley that uses Royal Purple. They’re charging $60-$65 for up to 6 quart of Royal Purple + a free car wash. I think that’s a pretty good deal considering Royal Purple goes for at least $6/quart and a car wash is $10.
I read about the new S4/S5 going with supercharger and I don’t like that decision. Problems with their old S4 shouldn’t be blame on the turbo but more of the engineering behind it. I never hear too much complaint from the Supra/Z/EVO/STI crowd regarding reliability, so I have to assume it’s more of an Audi problem and not turbo problem. It could also be the type of buyers as well. Supra/Z/EVO/STI buyers might know more about cars and not whine when something happen while S4 drivers might be more whiny to Audi. Who knows…
July 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM #242406an
Participant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]
You won’t be if after a few years of ownership, not running synthetic, and not letting your turbo cool down before shutting down. Trust me on that one. Not that I’ve had a problem with oil coking on my own car (because I do run full synthetic, change every 5k miles AND run a turbo timer that lets things idle for 2 minutes while I’m not there), it will happen more or less.What’s funny is that apparently audi is planning to use a supercharger on the next S4/S5, and not turbos. Perhaps too many problems with the biturbo in the first generation S4.
[/quote]
I’m already using full synthetic for my G35 and changing oil every 4k miles. I know with turbo comes more care, but I can deal with that for the extra potential. I would get a turbo timer and a oil cooler if I get a turbo car anyways, so the reliability shouldn’t be too much of an issue.BTW, there’s a new car wash/auto spa place that just open up in Sorrento Valley that uses Royal Purple. They’re charging $60-$65 for up to 6 quart of Royal Purple + a free car wash. I think that’s a pretty good deal considering Royal Purple goes for at least $6/quart and a car wash is $10.
I read about the new S4/S5 going with supercharger and I don’t like that decision. Problems with their old S4 shouldn’t be blame on the turbo but more of the engineering behind it. I never hear too much complaint from the Supra/Z/EVO/STI crowd regarding reliability, so I have to assume it’s more of an Audi problem and not turbo problem. It could also be the type of buyers as well. Supra/Z/EVO/STI buyers might know more about cars and not whine when something happen while S4 drivers might be more whiny to Audi. Who knows…
July 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM #242462an
Participant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]
You won’t be if after a few years of ownership, not running synthetic, and not letting your turbo cool down before shutting down. Trust me on that one. Not that I’ve had a problem with oil coking on my own car (because I do run full synthetic, change every 5k miles AND run a turbo timer that lets things idle for 2 minutes while I’m not there), it will happen more or less.What’s funny is that apparently audi is planning to use a supercharger on the next S4/S5, and not turbos. Perhaps too many problems with the biturbo in the first generation S4.
[/quote]
I’m already using full synthetic for my G35 and changing oil every 4k miles. I know with turbo comes more care, but I can deal with that for the extra potential. I would get a turbo timer and a oil cooler if I get a turbo car anyways, so the reliability shouldn’t be too much of an issue.BTW, there’s a new car wash/auto spa place that just open up in Sorrento Valley that uses Royal Purple. They’re charging $60-$65 for up to 6 quart of Royal Purple + a free car wash. I think that’s a pretty good deal considering Royal Purple goes for at least $6/quart and a car wash is $10.
I read about the new S4/S5 going with supercharger and I don’t like that decision. Problems with their old S4 shouldn’t be blame on the turbo but more of the engineering behind it. I never hear too much complaint from the Supra/Z/EVO/STI crowd regarding reliability, so I have to assume it’s more of an Audi problem and not turbo problem. It could also be the type of buyers as well. Supra/Z/EVO/STI buyers might know more about cars and not whine when something happen while S4 drivers might be more whiny to Audi. Who knows…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.