- This topic has 65 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2010 at 3:18 PM #629107November 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM #629576bearishgurlParticipant
[quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . The mystery has deepened as sources at the Pentagon claim to know nothing of the missile. Stated Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan, “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from… It does seem implausible, and that’s why at this point the operative term is ‘unexplained’. . .[/quote]
I watched CONCHO’s SD-8 News video.
The Pentagon is “playing dumb” here and has not authorized any dissemination of the incident yet, IMHO.
November 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM #629132bearishgurlParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . The mystery has deepened as sources at the Pentagon claim to know nothing of the missile. Stated Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan, “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from… It does seem implausible, and that’s why at this point the operative term is ‘unexplained’. . .[/quote]
I watched CONCHO’s SD-8 News video.
The Pentagon is “playing dumb” here and has not authorized any dissemination of the incident yet, IMHO.
November 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM #629258bearishgurlParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . The mystery has deepened as sources at the Pentagon claim to know nothing of the missile. Stated Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan, “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from… It does seem implausible, and that’s why at this point the operative term is ‘unexplained’. . .[/quote]
I watched CONCHO’s SD-8 News video.
The Pentagon is “playing dumb” here and has not authorized any dissemination of the incident yet, IMHO.
November 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM #628481bearishgurlParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . The mystery has deepened as sources at the Pentagon claim to know nothing of the missile. Stated Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan, “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from… It does seem implausible, and that’s why at this point the operative term is ‘unexplained’. . .[/quote]
I watched CONCHO’s SD-8 News video.
The Pentagon is “playing dumb” here and has not authorized any dissemination of the incident yet, IMHO.
November 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM #628559bearishgurlParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . The mystery has deepened as sources at the Pentagon claim to know nothing of the missile. Stated Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan, “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from… It does seem implausible, and that’s why at this point the operative term is ‘unexplained’. . .[/quote]
I watched CONCHO’s SD-8 News video.
The Pentagon is “playing dumb” here and has not authorized any dissemination of the incident yet, IMHO.
November 9, 2010 at 8:38 PM #629247Effective DemandParticipantIts just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.
November 9, 2010 at 8:38 PM #628595Effective DemandParticipantIts just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.
November 9, 2010 at 8:38 PM #629373Effective DemandParticipantIts just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.
November 9, 2010 at 8:38 PM #628675Effective DemandParticipantIts just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.
November 9, 2010 at 8:38 PM #629692Effective DemandParticipantIts just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.
November 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM #629744blahblahblahParticipant[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]
Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.
Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!
November 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM #628727blahblahblahParticipant[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]
Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.
Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!
November 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM #628649blahblahblahParticipant[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]
Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.
Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!
November 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM #629300blahblahblahParticipant[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]
Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.
Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.