- This topic has 55 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by Doofrat.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 9, 2008 at 5:06 PM #12044March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166382Ex-SDParticipant
Someone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.
Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?
March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166804Ex-SDParticipantSomeone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.
Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?
March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166742Ex-SDParticipantSomeone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.
Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?
March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166710Ex-SDParticipantSomeone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.
Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?
March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166702Ex-SDParticipantSomeone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.
Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?
March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166713TheBreezeParticipantMaybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.
March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166720TheBreezeParticipantMaybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.
March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166394TheBreezeParticipantMaybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.
March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166752TheBreezeParticipantMaybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.
March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166814TheBreezeParticipantMaybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.
March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166819xironmanParticipantIf they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart
March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166398xironmanParticipantIf they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart
March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166718xironmanParticipantIf they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart
March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166725xironmanParticipantIf they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.