- This topic has 55 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by
Doofrat.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 9, 2008 at 5:06 PM #12044March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166382
Ex-SD
ParticipantSomeone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.
Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?
March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166702ParticipantSomeone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.
Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?
March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166710ParticipantSomeone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.
Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?
March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166742ParticipantSomeone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.
Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?
March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166804ParticipantSomeone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.
Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?
March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166394TheBreeze
ParticipantMaybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.
March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166713ParticipantMaybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.
March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166720ParticipantMaybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.
March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166752ParticipantMaybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.
March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166814ParticipantMaybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.
March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166398xironman
ParticipantIf they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart
March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166718ParticipantIf they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart
March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166725ParticipantIf they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart
March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166757ParticipantIf they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.