- This topic has 270 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
Shadowfax.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 31, 2008 at 9:14 AM #249939July 31, 2008 at 9:15 AM #249715
meadandale
ParticipantMany on the loony left still believe that all these big bad muslims need is a hug. Seriously. Maybe some group therapy for a while to discuss their childhood issues.
Secular progressives just don’t get religious zealotry and don’t actually believe it is real. Which is odd considering their near religious embrace of things like environmentalism.
July 31, 2008 at 9:15 AM #249871ParticipantMany on the loony left still believe that all these big bad muslims need is a hug. Seriously. Maybe some group therapy for a while to discuss their childhood issues.
Secular progressives just don’t get religious zealotry and don’t actually believe it is real. Which is odd considering their near religious embrace of things like environmentalism.
July 31, 2008 at 9:15 AM #249878ParticipantMany on the loony left still believe that all these big bad muslims need is a hug. Seriously. Maybe some group therapy for a while to discuss their childhood issues.
Secular progressives just don’t get religious zealotry and don’t actually believe it is real. Which is odd considering their near religious embrace of things like environmentalism.
July 31, 2008 at 9:15 AM #249937ParticipantMany on the loony left still believe that all these big bad muslims need is a hug. Seriously. Maybe some group therapy for a while to discuss their childhood issues.
Secular progressives just don’t get religious zealotry and don’t actually believe it is real. Which is odd considering their near religious embrace of things like environmentalism.
July 31, 2008 at 9:15 AM #249944ParticipantMany on the loony left still believe that all these big bad muslims need is a hug. Seriously. Maybe some group therapy for a while to discuss their childhood issues.
Secular progressives just don’t get religious zealotry and don’t actually believe it is real. Which is odd considering their near religious embrace of things like environmentalism.
July 31, 2008 at 9:27 AM #249720Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantHitler clearly laid out his plans as early as the 1920s in his book “Mein Kampf”. Unfortunately, and with few exceptions, no one in power during his rise to power in the 1930s took him seriously.
One of the exceptions, Winston Churchill, was roundly condemned for his stance on Hitler and Germany, and was thought to be agitating for another war. Sadly, he was proved right in his statements about Hitler and Germany’s plans.
Iran has been very clear in their desire to eliminate both Israel and the US. Much like the British, Americans and French during the 1930s, they are being ignored or the possible threat is being downplayed.
If Iran develops nuke capability, all they need to do following is secure a SRBM (short-range ballistic missile) or MRBM (medium-range ballistic missile) system for delivery (and the Russians have buttloads of these available for hard currency sale) and they could hit Tel Aviv comfortably. Anyone here think they wouldn’t, if they could?
July 31, 2008 at 9:27 AM #249876ParticipantHitler clearly laid out his plans as early as the 1920s in his book “Mein Kampf”. Unfortunately, and with few exceptions, no one in power during his rise to power in the 1930s took him seriously.
One of the exceptions, Winston Churchill, was roundly condemned for his stance on Hitler and Germany, and was thought to be agitating for another war. Sadly, he was proved right in his statements about Hitler and Germany’s plans.
Iran has been very clear in their desire to eliminate both Israel and the US. Much like the British, Americans and French during the 1930s, they are being ignored or the possible threat is being downplayed.
If Iran develops nuke capability, all they need to do following is secure a SRBM (short-range ballistic missile) or MRBM (medium-range ballistic missile) system for delivery (and the Russians have buttloads of these available for hard currency sale) and they could hit Tel Aviv comfortably. Anyone here think they wouldn’t, if they could?
July 31, 2008 at 9:27 AM #249883ParticipantHitler clearly laid out his plans as early as the 1920s in his book “Mein Kampf”. Unfortunately, and with few exceptions, no one in power during his rise to power in the 1930s took him seriously.
One of the exceptions, Winston Churchill, was roundly condemned for his stance on Hitler and Germany, and was thought to be agitating for another war. Sadly, he was proved right in his statements about Hitler and Germany’s plans.
Iran has been very clear in their desire to eliminate both Israel and the US. Much like the British, Americans and French during the 1930s, they are being ignored or the possible threat is being downplayed.
If Iran develops nuke capability, all they need to do following is secure a SRBM (short-range ballistic missile) or MRBM (medium-range ballistic missile) system for delivery (and the Russians have buttloads of these available for hard currency sale) and they could hit Tel Aviv comfortably. Anyone here think they wouldn’t, if they could?
July 31, 2008 at 9:27 AM #249942ParticipantHitler clearly laid out his plans as early as the 1920s in his book “Mein Kampf”. Unfortunately, and with few exceptions, no one in power during his rise to power in the 1930s took him seriously.
One of the exceptions, Winston Churchill, was roundly condemned for his stance on Hitler and Germany, and was thought to be agitating for another war. Sadly, he was proved right in his statements about Hitler and Germany’s plans.
Iran has been very clear in their desire to eliminate both Israel and the US. Much like the British, Americans and French during the 1930s, they are being ignored or the possible threat is being downplayed.
If Iran develops nuke capability, all they need to do following is secure a SRBM (short-range ballistic missile) or MRBM (medium-range ballistic missile) system for delivery (and the Russians have buttloads of these available for hard currency sale) and they could hit Tel Aviv comfortably. Anyone here think they wouldn’t, if they could?
July 31, 2008 at 9:27 AM #249949ParticipantHitler clearly laid out his plans as early as the 1920s in his book “Mein Kampf”. Unfortunately, and with few exceptions, no one in power during his rise to power in the 1930s took him seriously.
One of the exceptions, Winston Churchill, was roundly condemned for his stance on Hitler and Germany, and was thought to be agitating for another war. Sadly, he was proved right in his statements about Hitler and Germany’s plans.
Iran has been very clear in their desire to eliminate both Israel and the US. Much like the British, Americans and French during the 1930s, they are being ignored or the possible threat is being downplayed.
If Iran develops nuke capability, all they need to do following is secure a SRBM (short-range ballistic missile) or MRBM (medium-range ballistic missile) system for delivery (and the Russians have buttloads of these available for hard currency sale) and they could hit Tel Aviv comfortably. Anyone here think they wouldn’t, if they could?
July 31, 2008 at 10:50 AM #249829jficquette
Participant[quote=meadandale]Many on the loony left still believe that all these big bad muslims need is a hug. Seriously. Maybe some group therapy for a while to discuss their childhood issues.
Secular progressives just don’t get religious zealotry and don’t actually believe it is real. Which is odd considering their near religious embrace of things like environmentalism.[/quote]
I call them regressives since their socialism has never worked in any other country.
A real progressive to me would be someone who wanted to get rid of all government that wasn’t “neccessary”. THAT has never been tried before and that would truly be progressive.
John
July 31, 2008 at 10:50 AM #249985Participant[quote=meadandale]Many on the loony left still believe that all these big bad muslims need is a hug. Seriously. Maybe some group therapy for a while to discuss their childhood issues.
Secular progressives just don’t get religious zealotry and don’t actually believe it is real. Which is odd considering their near religious embrace of things like environmentalism.[/quote]
I call them regressives since their socialism has never worked in any other country.
A real progressive to me would be someone who wanted to get rid of all government that wasn’t “neccessary”. THAT has never been tried before and that would truly be progressive.
John
July 31, 2008 at 10:50 AM #249994Participant[quote=meadandale]Many on the loony left still believe that all these big bad muslims need is a hug. Seriously. Maybe some group therapy for a while to discuss their childhood issues.
Secular progressives just don’t get religious zealotry and don’t actually believe it is real. Which is odd considering their near religious embrace of things like environmentalism.[/quote]
I call them regressives since their socialism has never worked in any other country.
A real progressive to me would be someone who wanted to get rid of all government that wasn’t “neccessary”. THAT has never been tried before and that would truly be progressive.
John
July 31, 2008 at 10:50 AM #250052Participant[quote=meadandale]Many on the loony left still believe that all these big bad muslims need is a hug. Seriously. Maybe some group therapy for a while to discuss their childhood issues.
Secular progressives just don’t get religious zealotry and don’t actually believe it is real. Which is odd considering their near religious embrace of things like environmentalism.[/quote]
I call them regressives since their socialism has never worked in any other country.
A real progressive to me would be someone who wanted to get rid of all government that wasn’t “neccessary”. THAT has never been tried before and that would truly be progressive.
John
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.