- This topic has 255 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by
SK in CV.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 14, 2009 at 2:17 PM #430470July 14, 2009 at 2:17 PM #429747
SK in CV
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Further, she does have credibility issues as far as impartiality and racial/ethnic policies go, as illustrated by the “Ricci v. New Haven” decision. Hence my question on the impact of the Ricci testimony.[/quote]It may be a fair line of questioning. If it came from anyone other than Sessions. (A man who “had no problem with the KKK” until he found out they smoked dope.)
On her numerous allusions to her heritage, both Roberts and Alito said very similar things during their hearings. Alito said:
When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account.
Neither were criticized for it, nor if I recall correctly, even questioned about it.
See above for my response re: Ricci. She made the only correct decision she could. In overturning her court’s decision, the Roberts court reset the law.
July 14, 2009 at 2:17 PM #429965Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Further, she does have credibility issues as far as impartiality and racial/ethnic policies go, as illustrated by the “Ricci v. New Haven” decision. Hence my question on the impact of the Ricci testimony.[/quote]It may be a fair line of questioning. If it came from anyone other than Sessions. (A man who “had no problem with the KKK” until he found out they smoked dope.)
On her numerous allusions to her heritage, both Roberts and Alito said very similar things during their hearings. Alito said:
When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account.
Neither were criticized for it, nor if I recall correctly, even questioned about it.
See above for my response re: Ricci. She made the only correct decision she could. In overturning her court’s decision, the Roberts court reset the law.
July 14, 2009 at 2:17 PM #430258Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Further, she does have credibility issues as far as impartiality and racial/ethnic policies go, as illustrated by the “Ricci v. New Haven” decision. Hence my question on the impact of the Ricci testimony.[/quote]It may be a fair line of questioning. If it came from anyone other than Sessions. (A man who “had no problem with the KKK” until he found out they smoked dope.)
On her numerous allusions to her heritage, both Roberts and Alito said very similar things during their hearings. Alito said:
When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account.
Neither were criticized for it, nor if I recall correctly, even questioned about it.
See above for my response re: Ricci. She made the only correct decision she could. In overturning her court’s decision, the Roberts court reset the law.
July 14, 2009 at 2:17 PM #430329Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Further, she does have credibility issues as far as impartiality and racial/ethnic policies go, as illustrated by the “Ricci v. New Haven” decision. Hence my question on the impact of the Ricci testimony.[/quote]It may be a fair line of questioning. If it came from anyone other than Sessions. (A man who “had no problem with the KKK” until he found out they smoked dope.)
On her numerous allusions to her heritage, both Roberts and Alito said very similar things during their hearings. Alito said:
When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account.
Neither were criticized for it, nor if I recall correctly, even questioned about it.
See above for my response re: Ricci. She made the only correct decision she could. In overturning her court’s decision, the Roberts court reset the law.
July 14, 2009 at 2:17 PM #430488Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Further, she does have credibility issues as far as impartiality and racial/ethnic policies go, as illustrated by the “Ricci v. New Haven” decision. Hence my question on the impact of the Ricci testimony.[/quote]It may be a fair line of questioning. If it came from anyone other than Sessions. (A man who “had no problem with the KKK” until he found out they smoked dope.)
On her numerous allusions to her heritage, both Roberts and Alito said very similar things during their hearings. Alito said:
When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account.
Neither were criticized for it, nor if I recall correctly, even questioned about it.
See above for my response re: Ricci. She made the only correct decision she could. In overturning her court’s decision, the Roberts court reset the law.
July 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM #429752briansd1
Guest[quote=SK in CV]
And on Ricci, Sotomayor DID follow precedent. Had her court found other than the way it did, she would have been disregarding precedent. It was the SCOTUS, in overturning her court’s decision that created new precedent.
[/quote]I agree with this.
July 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM #429969Guest[quote=SK in CV]
And on Ricci, Sotomayor DID follow precedent. Had her court found other than the way it did, she would have been disregarding precedent. It was the SCOTUS, in overturning her court’s decision that created new precedent.
[/quote]I agree with this.
July 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM #430263Guest[quote=SK in CV]
And on Ricci, Sotomayor DID follow precedent. Had her court found other than the way it did, she would have been disregarding precedent. It was the SCOTUS, in overturning her court’s decision that created new precedent.
[/quote]I agree with this.
July 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM #430334Guest[quote=SK in CV]
And on Ricci, Sotomayor DID follow precedent. Had her court found other than the way it did, she would have been disregarding precedent. It was the SCOTUS, in overturning her court’s decision that created new precedent.
[/quote]I agree with this.
July 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM #430493Guest[quote=SK in CV]
And on Ricci, Sotomayor DID follow precedent. Had her court found other than the way it did, she would have been disregarding precedent. It was the SCOTUS, in overturning her court’s decision that created new precedent.
[/quote]I agree with this.
July 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM #429757Participant[quote=Zeitgeist]
Sk,Your words mirror the content of your heart. It is up to you to examine those thoughts. You already know the answer.[/quote]
Put up, or shut up.
July 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM #429974Participant[quote=Zeitgeist]
Sk,Your words mirror the content of your heart. It is up to you to examine those thoughts. You already know the answer.[/quote]
Put up, or shut up.
July 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM #430268Participant[quote=Zeitgeist]
Sk,Your words mirror the content of your heart. It is up to you to examine those thoughts. You already know the answer.[/quote]
Put up, or shut up.
July 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM #430339Participant[quote=Zeitgeist]
Sk,Your words mirror the content of your heart. It is up to you to examine those thoughts. You already know the answer.[/quote]
Put up, or shut up.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.