- This topic has 1,886 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by Jazzman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 29, 2009 at 3:01 PM #439300July 29, 2009 at 4:25 PM #438547dbapigParticipant
[quote=CONCHO]”Sit down, my son. We don’t read most of the legislation we vote on.”[/quote]
hmmm, SDR what do you think?
July 29, 2009 at 4:25 PM #438750dbapigParticipant[quote=CONCHO]”Sit down, my son. We don’t read most of the legislation we vote on.”[/quote]
hmmm, SDR what do you think?
July 29, 2009 at 4:25 PM #439074dbapigParticipant[quote=CONCHO]”Sit down, my son. We don’t read most of the legislation we vote on.”[/quote]
hmmm, SDR what do you think?
July 29, 2009 at 4:25 PM #439146dbapigParticipant[quote=CONCHO]”Sit down, my son. We don’t read most of the legislation we vote on.”[/quote]
hmmm, SDR what do you think?
July 29, 2009 at 4:25 PM #439315dbapigParticipant[quote=CONCHO]”Sit down, my son. We don’t read most of the legislation we vote on.”[/quote]
hmmm, SDR what do you think?
July 29, 2009 at 4:39 PM #438562blahblahblahParticipantIt’s the same as with the Patriot Act. Remember when Michael Moore interviewed Conyers in “Fahrenheit 911” and asked him if he had read the Patriot Act before voting to approve it? He said something to the effect of — “Sit down, my son. We don’t read most of the legislation we vote on.”
Found it — it’s actually in the trailer for the film. Go to 1:01 in. Just so no one thinks this is anything new, or that Conyers is the only one not reading legislation. He’s just one of the few honest enough to admit it.
July 29, 2009 at 4:39 PM #438765blahblahblahParticipantIt’s the same as with the Patriot Act. Remember when Michael Moore interviewed Conyers in “Fahrenheit 911” and asked him if he had read the Patriot Act before voting to approve it? He said something to the effect of — “Sit down, my son. We don’t read most of the legislation we vote on.”
Found it — it’s actually in the trailer for the film. Go to 1:01 in. Just so no one thinks this is anything new, or that Conyers is the only one not reading legislation. He’s just one of the few honest enough to admit it.
July 29, 2009 at 4:39 PM #439089blahblahblahParticipantIt’s the same as with the Patriot Act. Remember when Michael Moore interviewed Conyers in “Fahrenheit 911” and asked him if he had read the Patriot Act before voting to approve it? He said something to the effect of — “Sit down, my son. We don’t read most of the legislation we vote on.”
Found it — it’s actually in the trailer for the film. Go to 1:01 in. Just so no one thinks this is anything new, or that Conyers is the only one not reading legislation. He’s just one of the few honest enough to admit it.
July 29, 2009 at 4:39 PM #439160blahblahblahParticipantIt’s the same as with the Patriot Act. Remember when Michael Moore interviewed Conyers in “Fahrenheit 911” and asked him if he had read the Patriot Act before voting to approve it? He said something to the effect of — “Sit down, my son. We don’t read most of the legislation we vote on.”
Found it — it’s actually in the trailer for the film. Go to 1:01 in. Just so no one thinks this is anything new, or that Conyers is the only one not reading legislation. He’s just one of the few honest enough to admit it.
July 29, 2009 at 4:39 PM #439330blahblahblahParticipantIt’s the same as with the Patriot Act. Remember when Michael Moore interviewed Conyers in “Fahrenheit 911” and asked him if he had read the Patriot Act before voting to approve it? He said something to the effect of — “Sit down, my son. We don’t read most of the legislation we vote on.”
Found it — it’s actually in the trailer for the film. Go to 1:01 in. Just so no one thinks this is anything new, or that Conyers is the only one not reading legislation. He’s just one of the few honest enough to admit it.
July 29, 2009 at 10:19 PM #438797SD RealtorParticipantSo once again,
Your compelling argument is… and lets just state this for the record,
that this bill should be passed because
a) because if it is not passed now it will not be passed at all.
or
b) because the govt sucked in the past it is okay to continue to suck.
Again, I am not being facetious here, I am simply trying to understand why you want THIS PARTICULAR health reform bill to pass. Again, I am not saying health reform is not needed, I just want a more well thought out plan, one that is more understandable with a less orwellian approach.
So far both yours and conchos responses to my continued queries have been simply to say that this is the way it has always been so it is okay to continue in this manner. (ie patriot act, war in iraq, etc…)
Anyways if you could clarify my understanding that would help.
July 29, 2009 at 10:19 PM #438998SD RealtorParticipantSo once again,
Your compelling argument is… and lets just state this for the record,
that this bill should be passed because
a) because if it is not passed now it will not be passed at all.
or
b) because the govt sucked in the past it is okay to continue to suck.
Again, I am not being facetious here, I am simply trying to understand why you want THIS PARTICULAR health reform bill to pass. Again, I am not saying health reform is not needed, I just want a more well thought out plan, one that is more understandable with a less orwellian approach.
So far both yours and conchos responses to my continued queries have been simply to say that this is the way it has always been so it is okay to continue in this manner. (ie patriot act, war in iraq, etc…)
Anyways if you could clarify my understanding that would help.
July 29, 2009 at 10:19 PM #439323SD RealtorParticipantSo once again,
Your compelling argument is… and lets just state this for the record,
that this bill should be passed because
a) because if it is not passed now it will not be passed at all.
or
b) because the govt sucked in the past it is okay to continue to suck.
Again, I am not being facetious here, I am simply trying to understand why you want THIS PARTICULAR health reform bill to pass. Again, I am not saying health reform is not needed, I just want a more well thought out plan, one that is more understandable with a less orwellian approach.
So far both yours and conchos responses to my continued queries have been simply to say that this is the way it has always been so it is okay to continue in this manner. (ie patriot act, war in iraq, etc…)
Anyways if you could clarify my understanding that would help.
July 29, 2009 at 10:19 PM #439394SD RealtorParticipantSo once again,
Your compelling argument is… and lets just state this for the record,
that this bill should be passed because
a) because if it is not passed now it will not be passed at all.
or
b) because the govt sucked in the past it is okay to continue to suck.
Again, I am not being facetious here, I am simply trying to understand why you want THIS PARTICULAR health reform bill to pass. Again, I am not saying health reform is not needed, I just want a more well thought out plan, one that is more understandable with a less orwellian approach.
So far both yours and conchos responses to my continued queries have been simply to say that this is the way it has always been so it is okay to continue in this manner. (ie patriot act, war in iraq, etc…)
Anyways if you could clarify my understanding that would help.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.