Obama is the great hype machine

[equalizer]

See, you did give me a lecture. My first comment to you was meant in jest, no offense meant whatsoever. I knew only you would be dare to engage and checkmate me. 🙂

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Two things. First, no offense taken, and hence the Depakote comment.

Second, ya got me. That tripwire can go off a little too easily at times apparently. Good on you, bub.

Relative to Spence: That book recommend is something more in line with Kaczinsky, in that it is something of a rambling screed, and not possessed of much coherence or cogency.

Peace, yourself.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Two things. First, no offense taken, and hence the Depakote comment.

Second, ya got me. That tripwire can go off a little too easily at times apparently. Good on you, bub.

Relative to Spence: That book recommend is something more in line with Kaczinsky, in that it is something of a rambling screed, and not possessed of much coherence or cogency.

Peace, yourself.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Two things. First, no offense taken, and hence the Depakote comment.

Second, ya got me. That tripwire can go off a little too easily at times apparently. Good on you, bub.

Relative to Spence: That book recommend is something more in line with Kaczinsky, in that it is something of a rambling screed, and not possessed of much coherence or cogency.

Peace, yourself.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Two things. First, no offense taken, and hence the Depakote comment.

Second, ya got me. That tripwire can go off a little too easily at times apparently. Good on you, bub.

Relative to Spence: That book recommend is something more in line with Kaczinsky, in that it is something of a rambling screed, and not possessed of much coherence or cogency.

Peace, yourself.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Two things. First, no offense taken, and hence the Depakote comment.

Second, ya got me. That tripwire can go off a little too easily at times apparently. Good on you, bub.

Relative to Spence: That book recommend is something more in line with Kaczinsky, in that it is something of a rambling screed, and not possessed of much coherence or cogency.

Peace, yourself.

[no_such_reality]

I don’t care about Imus. The way I see it, it was free market in action reacting to free speech. He was free to be stupid, the market reacted.

There is also a major difference, people were offended by the context of Imus’ message, largely in context. As opposed to the mere use of a word which is apparently prohibited and has a defacto context applied.

[no_such_reality]

I don’t care about Imus. The way I see it, it was free market in action reacting to free speech. He was free to be stupid, the market reacted.

There is also a major difference, people were offended by the context of Imus’ message, largely in context. As opposed to the mere use of a word which is apparently prohibited and has a defacto context applied.

[no_such_reality]

I don’t care about Imus. The way I see it, it was free market in action reacting to free speech. He was free to be stupid, the market reacted.

There is also a major difference, people were offended by the context of Imus’ message, largely in context. As opposed to the mere use of a word which is apparently prohibited and has a defacto context applied.

[no_such_reality]

I don’t care about Imus. The way I see it, it was free market in action reacting to free speech. He was free to be stupid, the market reacted.

There is also a major difference, people were offended by the context of Imus’ message, largely in context. As opposed to the mere use of a word which is apparently prohibited and has a defacto context applied.

[no_such_reality]

I don’t care about Imus. The way I see it, it was free market in action reacting to free speech. He was free to be stupid, the market reacted.

There is also a major difference, people were offended by the context of Imus’ message, largely in context. As opposed to the mere use of a word which is apparently prohibited and has a defacto context applied.

[equalizer]

Allan,

Are you talking about this book?: Justice For None: A Novel (Hardcover)
by Gene Hackman (Author), Daniel Lenihan (Author)

thanks

[equalizer]

Allan,

Are you talking about this book?: Justice For None: A Novel (Hardcover)
by Gene Hackman (Author), Daniel Lenihan (Author)

thanks

[equalizer]

Allan,

Are you talking about this book?: Justice For None: A Novel (Hardcover)
by Gene Hackman (Author), Daniel Lenihan (Author)

thanks

[equalizer]

Allan,

Are you talking about this book?: Justice For None: A Novel (Hardcover)
by Gene Hackman (Author), Daniel Lenihan (Author)

thanks

[Author]

Posts