- This topic has 1,004 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 12, 2009 at 11:24 PM #482926November 12, 2009 at 11:42 PM #482089ucodegenParticipant
Some well-bred Brits think of Americans as savages — rich and powerful savages with money and big guns, but savages nonetheless.
Also a side effect of us savagely kicking the RedCoats out of the US with our guns… π
Michelle is only a private citizen so she can hug the queen as friends would do.
No.. not at a public event, particularly if it was a political event. I did a little search on it.. there is a variant that makes this different. The Queen initiated it by putting her hand on Mrs Obama’s back first. This changes the picture a bit. Only thing that Michelle Obama may have done wrong is keeping her arm at the Queen’s back a little too long after the Queen removed hers. So some if it is blown out of proportion.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1166490/Ones-new-best-friend-The-Queen-Michelle-new-touchy-feely-protocol.htmlhttp://fromtheleft.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-v-bush-a-study-in-contrasts/
Cute photoshop on the Bush image.. notice that there is no shadow between the faces, but there is sunlight casting shadows on the headcovering of Abdullah. — fake
November 12, 2009 at 11:42 PM #482256ucodegenParticipantSome well-bred Brits think of Americans as savages — rich and powerful savages with money and big guns, but savages nonetheless.
Also a side effect of us savagely kicking the RedCoats out of the US with our guns… π
Michelle is only a private citizen so she can hug the queen as friends would do.
No.. not at a public event, particularly if it was a political event. I did a little search on it.. there is a variant that makes this different. The Queen initiated it by putting her hand on Mrs Obama’s back first. This changes the picture a bit. Only thing that Michelle Obama may have done wrong is keeping her arm at the Queen’s back a little too long after the Queen removed hers. So some if it is blown out of proportion.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1166490/Ones-new-best-friend-The-Queen-Michelle-new-touchy-feely-protocol.htmlhttp://fromtheleft.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-v-bush-a-study-in-contrasts/
Cute photoshop on the Bush image.. notice that there is no shadow between the faces, but there is sunlight casting shadows on the headcovering of Abdullah. — fake
November 12, 2009 at 11:42 PM #482627ucodegenParticipantSome well-bred Brits think of Americans as savages — rich and powerful savages with money and big guns, but savages nonetheless.
Also a side effect of us savagely kicking the RedCoats out of the US with our guns… π
Michelle is only a private citizen so she can hug the queen as friends would do.
No.. not at a public event, particularly if it was a political event. I did a little search on it.. there is a variant that makes this different. The Queen initiated it by putting her hand on Mrs Obama’s back first. This changes the picture a bit. Only thing that Michelle Obama may have done wrong is keeping her arm at the Queen’s back a little too long after the Queen removed hers. So some if it is blown out of proportion.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1166490/Ones-new-best-friend-The-Queen-Michelle-new-touchy-feely-protocol.htmlhttp://fromtheleft.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-v-bush-a-study-in-contrasts/
Cute photoshop on the Bush image.. notice that there is no shadow between the faces, but there is sunlight casting shadows on the headcovering of Abdullah. — fake
November 12, 2009 at 11:42 PM #482707ucodegenParticipantSome well-bred Brits think of Americans as savages — rich and powerful savages with money and big guns, but savages nonetheless.
Also a side effect of us savagely kicking the RedCoats out of the US with our guns… π
Michelle is only a private citizen so she can hug the queen as friends would do.
No.. not at a public event, particularly if it was a political event. I did a little search on it.. there is a variant that makes this different. The Queen initiated it by putting her hand on Mrs Obama’s back first. This changes the picture a bit. Only thing that Michelle Obama may have done wrong is keeping her arm at the Queen’s back a little too long after the Queen removed hers. So some if it is blown out of proportion.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1166490/Ones-new-best-friend-The-Queen-Michelle-new-touchy-feely-protocol.htmlhttp://fromtheleft.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-v-bush-a-study-in-contrasts/
Cute photoshop on the Bush image.. notice that there is no shadow between the faces, but there is sunlight casting shadows on the headcovering of Abdullah. — fake
November 12, 2009 at 11:42 PM #482931ucodegenParticipantSome well-bred Brits think of Americans as savages — rich and powerful savages with money and big guns, but savages nonetheless.
Also a side effect of us savagely kicking the RedCoats out of the US with our guns… π
Michelle is only a private citizen so she can hug the queen as friends would do.
No.. not at a public event, particularly if it was a political event. I did a little search on it.. there is a variant that makes this different. The Queen initiated it by putting her hand on Mrs Obama’s back first. This changes the picture a bit. Only thing that Michelle Obama may have done wrong is keeping her arm at the Queen’s back a little too long after the Queen removed hers. So some if it is blown out of proportion.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1166490/Ones-new-best-friend-The-Queen-Michelle-new-touchy-feely-protocol.htmlhttp://fromtheleft.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-v-bush-a-study-in-contrasts/
Cute photoshop on the Bush image.. notice that there is no shadow between the faces, but there is sunlight casting shadows on the headcovering of Abdullah. — fake
November 13, 2009 at 6:42 AM #482133jimmyleParticipantI am an independent and voted Ron Paul but this post is laughable.
I don’t like all the bailouts that were given out but do you think McCain would have done anything different? Before leaving office Bush already set up the course of action for bailouts to come. And the TARP was created before Obama came into office.
Bush didn’t bailout the Auto companies but he only delayed the action so Obama would have to sign the paper. Do you think the US would allow the big two to fail?
November 13, 2009 at 6:42 AM #482301jimmyleParticipantI am an independent and voted Ron Paul but this post is laughable.
I don’t like all the bailouts that were given out but do you think McCain would have done anything different? Before leaving office Bush already set up the course of action for bailouts to come. And the TARP was created before Obama came into office.
Bush didn’t bailout the Auto companies but he only delayed the action so Obama would have to sign the paper. Do you think the US would allow the big two to fail?
November 13, 2009 at 6:42 AM #482672jimmyleParticipantI am an independent and voted Ron Paul but this post is laughable.
I don’t like all the bailouts that were given out but do you think McCain would have done anything different? Before leaving office Bush already set up the course of action for bailouts to come. And the TARP was created before Obama came into office.
Bush didn’t bailout the Auto companies but he only delayed the action so Obama would have to sign the paper. Do you think the US would allow the big two to fail?
November 13, 2009 at 6:42 AM #482750jimmyleParticipantI am an independent and voted Ron Paul but this post is laughable.
I don’t like all the bailouts that were given out but do you think McCain would have done anything different? Before leaving office Bush already set up the course of action for bailouts to come. And the TARP was created before Obama came into office.
Bush didn’t bailout the Auto companies but he only delayed the action so Obama would have to sign the paper. Do you think the US would allow the big two to fail?
November 13, 2009 at 6:42 AM #482976jimmyleParticipantI am an independent and voted Ron Paul but this post is laughable.
I don’t like all the bailouts that were given out but do you think McCain would have done anything different? Before leaving office Bush already set up the course of action for bailouts to come. And the TARP was created before Obama came into office.
Bush didn’t bailout the Auto companies but he only delayed the action so Obama would have to sign the paper. Do you think the US would allow the big two to fail?
November 13, 2009 at 7:22 AM #482148CascaParticipantJohn, add to the list the decision this morning to try Khalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM), the 911 mastermind, in federal court in NYC. An absolute travesty of justice. Had the current course with the military tribunals been allowed to run in Gitmo, he was a month away from a death sentance. Now we’ll spend a prince’s ransom to both defend and prosecute him in a court where he will be allowed full constitutional protections. This fuck should have been dead a long time ago. There is evil upon the land.
November 13, 2009 at 7:22 AM #482316CascaParticipantJohn, add to the list the decision this morning to try Khalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM), the 911 mastermind, in federal court in NYC. An absolute travesty of justice. Had the current course with the military tribunals been allowed to run in Gitmo, he was a month away from a death sentance. Now we’ll spend a prince’s ransom to both defend and prosecute him in a court where he will be allowed full constitutional protections. This fuck should have been dead a long time ago. There is evil upon the land.
November 13, 2009 at 7:22 AM #482687CascaParticipantJohn, add to the list the decision this morning to try Khalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM), the 911 mastermind, in federal court in NYC. An absolute travesty of justice. Had the current course with the military tribunals been allowed to run in Gitmo, he was a month away from a death sentance. Now we’ll spend a prince’s ransom to both defend and prosecute him in a court where he will be allowed full constitutional protections. This fuck should have been dead a long time ago. There is evil upon the land.
November 13, 2009 at 7:22 AM #482765CascaParticipantJohn, add to the list the decision this morning to try Khalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM), the 911 mastermind, in federal court in NYC. An absolute travesty of justice. Had the current course with the military tribunals been allowed to run in Gitmo, he was a month away from a death sentance. Now we’ll spend a prince’s ransom to both defend and prosecute him in a court where he will be allowed full constitutional protections. This fuck should have been dead a long time ago. There is evil upon the land.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.