- This topic has 785 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 4, 2010 at 8:35 PM #510217February 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM #509317
DWCAP
ParticipantTG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.
February 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM #509463DWCAP
ParticipantTG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.
February 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM #509876DWCAP
ParticipantTG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.
February 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM #509968DWCAP
ParticipantTG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.
February 4, 2010 at 8:50 PM #510222DWCAP
ParticipantTG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.
February 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM #509322outtamojo
Participant“TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.”
Spot on bro. Great job spelling things out tho TG.
February 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM #509468outtamojo
Participant“TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.”
Spot on bro. Great job spelling things out tho TG.
February 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM #509881outtamojo
Participant“TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.”
Spot on bro. Great job spelling things out tho TG.
February 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM #509973outtamojo
Participant“TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.”
Spot on bro. Great job spelling things out tho TG.
February 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM #510227outtamojo
Participant“TG, I think the ‘ π ‘ was a hint that was a sarcastic post.”
Spot on bro. Great job spelling things out tho TG.
February 4, 2010 at 9:26 PM #509337temeculaguy
ParticipantMy bad, they really need to add one more line to the warnings on mixing nyquil and wine to include “may inhibit your ability to identify emoticons.”
I guess I overeact lately because mojo’s sarcastic statement is now the water cooler talk amongst my real life friends who are always behind the curve. In 2007 they repeated the NAR’s spin and now they repeat what they get from the MSM, which is what I was telling them a few years ago and is circa 2007 piggington, but is no longer valid. My apologies for not taking a second look before responding.
February 4, 2010 at 9:26 PM #509483temeculaguy
ParticipantMy bad, they really need to add one more line to the warnings on mixing nyquil and wine to include “may inhibit your ability to identify emoticons.”
I guess I overeact lately because mojo’s sarcastic statement is now the water cooler talk amongst my real life friends who are always behind the curve. In 2007 they repeated the NAR’s spin and now they repeat what they get from the MSM, which is what I was telling them a few years ago and is circa 2007 piggington, but is no longer valid. My apologies for not taking a second look before responding.
February 4, 2010 at 9:26 PM #509896temeculaguy
ParticipantMy bad, they really need to add one more line to the warnings on mixing nyquil and wine to include “may inhibit your ability to identify emoticons.”
I guess I overeact lately because mojo’s sarcastic statement is now the water cooler talk amongst my real life friends who are always behind the curve. In 2007 they repeated the NAR’s spin and now they repeat what they get from the MSM, which is what I was telling them a few years ago and is circa 2007 piggington, but is no longer valid. My apologies for not taking a second look before responding.
February 4, 2010 at 9:26 PM #509988temeculaguy
ParticipantMy bad, they really need to add one more line to the warnings on mixing nyquil and wine to include “may inhibit your ability to identify emoticons.”
I guess I overeact lately because mojo’s sarcastic statement is now the water cooler talk amongst my real life friends who are always behind the curve. In 2007 they repeated the NAR’s spin and now they repeat what they get from the MSM, which is what I was telling them a few years ago and is circa 2007 piggington, but is no longer valid. My apologies for not taking a second look before responding.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.