Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › No dip in county index for 8th straight month
- This topic has 90 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by
outtamojo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 10, 2010 at 11:21 AM #500876January 10, 2010 at 12:21 PM #501369
Arraya
Participant[quote=outtamojo]”An exodus of discouraged workers from the job
market kept the U.S. unemployment rate from climbing above 10 percent
in December, economists said. Had the labor force not decreased by
661,000 last month, the jobless rate would have been 10.4 percent”Go ahead and tweak how things are counted- has the real world changed one iota because you chose to count things differently?[/quote]
I know, right. Those irritating “doomsayers” that insist on counting things and accurate measurement are such a nuisance. What do they want, for the market to get upset? They just don’t understand the genius of “out of sight, out of mind”, the American motto
Hmmm, uh? Let’s think about that for a second, why don’t we?
Besides the lives of people put in “shadow” land. I guess, it’s all good? Data and statistics are only good as perception, right? A little massaging till happy ending is good for the soul. The old “head in sand” is a viable survival strategy for Ostriches, why not economic statistics as a measure of health as well. Besides, recent studies indicate that seeing high unemployment numbers is bad for digestion and affects peoples purchase decisions. Just like that pesky RE shadow inventory that may or may not exist. Maybe we should just stop counting things that we don’t like as a means of making them go away.
All we have to do is find a way to fake falling tax receipts and it’s smooth sailing.
Oh look, that virtual nostradamus Alan Gin is predicting puppies and ice cream for everybody! Hooray!
January 10, 2010 at 12:21 PM #500730Arraya
Participant[quote=outtamojo]”An exodus of discouraged workers from the job
market kept the U.S. unemployment rate from climbing above 10 percent
in December, economists said. Had the labor force not decreased by
661,000 last month, the jobless rate would have been 10.4 percent”Go ahead and tweak how things are counted- has the real world changed one iota because you chose to count things differently?[/quote]
I know, right. Those irritating “doomsayers” that insist on counting things and accurate measurement are such a nuisance. What do they want, for the market to get upset? They just don’t understand the genius of “out of sight, out of mind”, the American motto
Hmmm, uh? Let’s think about that for a second, why don’t we?
Besides the lives of people put in “shadow” land. I guess, it’s all good? Data and statistics are only good as perception, right? A little massaging till happy ending is good for the soul. The old “head in sand” is a viable survival strategy for Ostriches, why not economic statistics as a measure of health as well. Besides, recent studies indicate that seeing high unemployment numbers is bad for digestion and affects peoples purchase decisions. Just like that pesky RE shadow inventory that may or may not exist. Maybe we should just stop counting things that we don’t like as a means of making them go away.
All we have to do is find a way to fake falling tax receipts and it’s smooth sailing.
Oh look, that virtual nostradamus Alan Gin is predicting puppies and ice cream for everybody! Hooray!
January 10, 2010 at 12:21 PM #501274Arraya
Participant[quote=outtamojo]”An exodus of discouraged workers from the job
market kept the U.S. unemployment rate from climbing above 10 percent
in December, economists said. Had the labor force not decreased by
661,000 last month, the jobless rate would have been 10.4 percent”Go ahead and tweak how things are counted- has the real world changed one iota because you chose to count things differently?[/quote]
I know, right. Those irritating “doomsayers” that insist on counting things and accurate measurement are such a nuisance. What do they want, for the market to get upset? They just don’t understand the genius of “out of sight, out of mind”, the American motto
Hmmm, uh? Let’s think about that for a second, why don’t we?
Besides the lives of people put in “shadow” land. I guess, it’s all good? Data and statistics are only good as perception, right? A little massaging till happy ending is good for the soul. The old “head in sand” is a viable survival strategy for Ostriches, why not economic statistics as a measure of health as well. Besides, recent studies indicate that seeing high unemployment numbers is bad for digestion and affects peoples purchase decisions. Just like that pesky RE shadow inventory that may or may not exist. Maybe we should just stop counting things that we don’t like as a means of making them go away.
All we have to do is find a way to fake falling tax receipts and it’s smooth sailing.
Oh look, that virtual nostradamus Alan Gin is predicting puppies and ice cream for everybody! Hooray!
January 10, 2010 at 12:21 PM #500881Arraya
Participant[quote=outtamojo]”An exodus of discouraged workers from the job
market kept the U.S. unemployment rate from climbing above 10 percent
in December, economists said. Had the labor force not decreased by
661,000 last month, the jobless rate would have been 10.4 percent”Go ahead and tweak how things are counted- has the real world changed one iota because you chose to count things differently?[/quote]
I know, right. Those irritating “doomsayers” that insist on counting things and accurate measurement are such a nuisance. What do they want, for the market to get upset? They just don’t understand the genius of “out of sight, out of mind”, the American motto
Hmmm, uh? Let’s think about that for a second, why don’t we?
Besides the lives of people put in “shadow” land. I guess, it’s all good? Data and statistics are only good as perception, right? A little massaging till happy ending is good for the soul. The old “head in sand” is a viable survival strategy for Ostriches, why not economic statistics as a measure of health as well. Besides, recent studies indicate that seeing high unemployment numbers is bad for digestion and affects peoples purchase decisions. Just like that pesky RE shadow inventory that may or may not exist. Maybe we should just stop counting things that we don’t like as a means of making them go away.
All we have to do is find a way to fake falling tax receipts and it’s smooth sailing.
Oh look, that virtual nostradamus Alan Gin is predicting puppies and ice cream for everybody! Hooray!
January 10, 2010 at 12:21 PM #501615Arraya
Participant[quote=outtamojo]”An exodus of discouraged workers from the job
market kept the U.S. unemployment rate from climbing above 10 percent
in December, economists said. Had the labor force not decreased by
661,000 last month, the jobless rate would have been 10.4 percent”Go ahead and tweak how things are counted- has the real world changed one iota because you chose to count things differently?[/quote]
I know, right. Those irritating “doomsayers” that insist on counting things and accurate measurement are such a nuisance. What do they want, for the market to get upset? They just don’t understand the genius of “out of sight, out of mind”, the American motto
Hmmm, uh? Let’s think about that for a second, why don’t we?
Besides the lives of people put in “shadow” land. I guess, it’s all good? Data and statistics are only good as perception, right? A little massaging till happy ending is good for the soul. The old “head in sand” is a viable survival strategy for Ostriches, why not economic statistics as a measure of health as well. Besides, recent studies indicate that seeing high unemployment numbers is bad for digestion and affects peoples purchase decisions. Just like that pesky RE shadow inventory that may or may not exist. Maybe we should just stop counting things that we don’t like as a means of making them go away.
All we have to do is find a way to fake falling tax receipts and it’s smooth sailing.
Oh look, that virtual nostradamus Alan Gin is predicting puppies and ice cream for everybody! Hooray!
January 10, 2010 at 1:12 PM #501374outtamojo
ParticipantMy point is, nobody lives in a chart
or on a graph. Let’s just go ahead and count and report things the way YOU want to count them – I am fine with that. A simple question:will that make more living breathing people not have jobs?January 10, 2010 at 1:12 PM #500736outtamojo
ParticipantMy point is, nobody lives in a chart
or on a graph. Let’s just go ahead and count and report things the way YOU want to count them – I am fine with that. A simple question:will that make more living breathing people not have jobs?January 10, 2010 at 1:12 PM #501279outtamojo
ParticipantMy point is, nobody lives in a chart
or on a graph. Let’s just go ahead and count and report things the way YOU want to count them – I am fine with that. A simple question:will that make more living breathing people not have jobs?January 10, 2010 at 1:12 PM #500886outtamojo
ParticipantMy point is, nobody lives in a chart
or on a graph. Let’s just go ahead and count and report things the way YOU want to count them – I am fine with that. A simple question:will that make more living breathing people not have jobs?January 10, 2010 at 1:12 PM #501620outtamojo
ParticipantMy point is, nobody lives in a chart
or on a graph. Let’s just go ahead and count and report things the way YOU want to count them – I am fine with that. A simple question:will that make more living breathing people not have jobs?January 10, 2010 at 1:53 PM #500755creechrr
Participant[quote=outtamojo]My point is, nobody lives in a chart
or on a graph. Let’s just go ahead and count and report things the way YOU want to count them – I am fine with that. A simple question:will that make more living breathing people not have jobs?[/quote]Well, doesn’t job loss beget job loss?
January 10, 2010 at 1:53 PM #501393creechrr
Participant[quote=outtamojo]My point is, nobody lives in a chart
or on a graph. Let’s just go ahead and count and report things the way YOU want to count them – I am fine with that. A simple question:will that make more living breathing people not have jobs?[/quote]Well, doesn’t job loss beget job loss?
January 10, 2010 at 1:53 PM #501298creechrr
Participant[quote=outtamojo]My point is, nobody lives in a chart
or on a graph. Let’s just go ahead and count and report things the way YOU want to count them – I am fine with that. A simple question:will that make more living breathing people not have jobs?[/quote]Well, doesn’t job loss beget job loss?
January 10, 2010 at 1:53 PM #501640creechrr
Participant[quote=outtamojo]My point is, nobody lives in a chart
or on a graph. Let’s just go ahead and count and report things the way YOU want to count them – I am fine with that. A simple question:will that make more living breathing people not have jobs?[/quote]Well, doesn’t job loss beget job loss?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.