Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › new development south of 56?
- This topic has 7 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by Essbee.
May 9, 2014 at 9:49 PM #21073May 9, 2014 at 9:58 PM #773877
Maybe it’s this:
that is, maybe it’s the “affordable housing units” mentioned in the article as being “south of 56”.May 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM #773965fypioParticipant
It’s a mixed use development project called The Village at Pacific Highlands Ranch.
http://www.cbre.us/o/sandiego/AssetLibrary/Retail-Part-of-Project-Near-Carmel-Valley.pdfMay 12, 2014 at 9:07 PM #773969
I’m referring to something south of 56. (It sounds like the project in the article is north of 56).May 13, 2014 at 10:46 AM #773993bababooeyParticipant
Noticed it as well. I was thinking since the end of the world is coming soon with the drought and all the city would stop building permits to conserve water.
I should conserve water while they add more people and buildings and keep Torry Pines green? I’ll get right on it.May 15, 2014 at 9:25 PM #774090equalizerParticipant
Land use map says that low density housing in tract RS-1-14. Of course the average dummy like me can’t make heads or tails out of this info. Completely obtuse, non-transparent. Landowners not listed here?
http://www.sandiego.gov/planning/community/profiles/pacifichighlandsranch/plan.shtmlMay 15, 2014 at 9:46 PM #774091equalizerParticipant
I think D.R. Horton owns or owned the land.May 15, 2014 at 9:49 PM #774092
Thank you!! Yes, that is the spot! On the PDF map, it is labeled as “low density housing”, elementary school, and park. Wow. I think they will need to build the new middle school as well.
Isn’t everything in Pacific Highlands Ranch being developed by Pardee?
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.