- This topic has 65 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
(former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 5, 2008 at 12:13 AM #11992March 5, 2008 at 9:47 AM #164293
patientlywaiting
ParticipantI agree with you waiting hawk. I would not buy anything at least until the recession has been declared AND we see some bank failures.
Small banks are hurting right now with construction loan defaults. They will go bankrupt by the dozens.
March 5, 2008 at 9:47 AM #164708patientlywaiting
ParticipantI agree with you waiting hawk. I would not buy anything at least until the recession has been declared AND we see some bank failures.
Small banks are hurting right now with construction loan defaults. They will go bankrupt by the dozens.
March 5, 2008 at 9:47 AM #164623patientlywaiting
ParticipantI agree with you waiting hawk. I would not buy anything at least until the recession has been declared AND we see some bank failures.
Small banks are hurting right now with construction loan defaults. They will go bankrupt by the dozens.
March 5, 2008 at 9:47 AM #164614patientlywaiting
ParticipantI agree with you waiting hawk. I would not buy anything at least until the recession has been declared AND we see some bank failures.
Small banks are hurting right now with construction loan defaults. They will go bankrupt by the dozens.
March 5, 2008 at 9:47 AM #164605patientlywaiting
ParticipantI agree with you waiting hawk. I would not buy anything at least until the recession has been declared AND we see some bank failures.
Small banks are hurting right now with construction loan defaults. They will go bankrupt by the dozens.
March 5, 2008 at 9:54 AM #164303Anonymous
GuestCompletely agree.
values do not double within a year like most idiots believe
you would have lost more buying into the down than buying into the slow rise.
I keep trying to explain this to people. That they’re not going to “miss the bottom”. A few percent here or there for not perfectly timing a bottom is not a big deal; but catching a falling knife is.
March 5, 2008 at 9:54 AM #164633Anonymous
GuestCompletely agree.
values do not double within a year like most idiots believe
you would have lost more buying into the down than buying into the slow rise.
I keep trying to explain this to people. That they’re not going to “miss the bottom”. A few percent here or there for not perfectly timing a bottom is not a big deal; but catching a falling knife is.
March 5, 2008 at 9:54 AM #164718Anonymous
GuestCompletely agree.
values do not double within a year like most idiots believe
you would have lost more buying into the down than buying into the slow rise.
I keep trying to explain this to people. That they’re not going to “miss the bottom”. A few percent here or there for not perfectly timing a bottom is not a big deal; but catching a falling knife is.
March 5, 2008 at 9:54 AM #164624Anonymous
GuestCompletely agree.
values do not double within a year like most idiots believe
you would have lost more buying into the down than buying into the slow rise.
I keep trying to explain this to people. That they’re not going to “miss the bottom”. A few percent here or there for not perfectly timing a bottom is not a big deal; but catching a falling knife is.
March 5, 2008 at 9:54 AM #164615Anonymous
GuestCompletely agree.
values do not double within a year like most idiots believe
you would have lost more buying into the down than buying into the slow rise.
I keep trying to explain this to people. That they’re not going to “miss the bottom”. A few percent here or there for not perfectly timing a bottom is not a big deal; but catching a falling knife is.
March 5, 2008 at 9:57 AM #164635(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantMy idea of an ideal Bottom is J.Lo’s or Beyonce’s behind.
As for housing, I would tend to agree with Waiting Hawk here. It has to appear to get worse and some players must capitulate (bank failures). Also, buying within a few years after the bottom does probably will not matter that much.
March 5, 2008 at 9:57 AM #164625(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantMy idea of an ideal Bottom is J.Lo’s or Beyonce’s behind.
As for housing, I would tend to agree with Waiting Hawk here. It has to appear to get worse and some players must capitulate (bank failures). Also, buying within a few years after the bottom does probably will not matter that much.
March 5, 2008 at 9:57 AM #164643(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantMy idea of an ideal Bottom is J.Lo’s or Beyonce’s behind.
As for housing, I would tend to agree with Waiting Hawk here. It has to appear to get worse and some players must capitulate (bank failures). Also, buying within a few years after the bottom does probably will not matter that much.
March 5, 2008 at 9:57 AM #164727(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantMy idea of an ideal Bottom is J.Lo’s or Beyonce’s behind.
As for housing, I would tend to agree with Waiting Hawk here. It has to appear to get worse and some players must capitulate (bank failures). Also, buying within a few years after the bottom does probably will not matter that much.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.