Missing Research Document on Long Term Appreciation Premium

[no_such_reality]

I’m hoping someone on Piggington will remember the research document that I recall.

I know it is not HSBC’s “Froth Finding Mission”.

The gist of the article was the focus on the appreciation differences between premium metropolitan areas and the non-primium areas and their respective real appreciation rates. If I recall correctly, nationwide was essentially 0% real and premium appreciation areas like San Francisco was nominal 5% with a ~1% appreciation over inflation.

Can anyone point to the research study or a similar one?

Thanks

[Colin]

Perhaps you are looking for this.

http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/cmayer/Papers/superstar_cities_final.pdf

[Colin]

Perhaps you are looking for this.

http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/cmayer/Papers/superstar_cities_final.pdf

[no_such_reality]

Thank you Colin, that was one of the ones I remembered.

[no_such_reality]

Thank you Colin, that was one of the ones I remembered.

[patientrenter]

nsr, great question. I’ve been following this thread… I hadn’t realized there was serious research done on this subject. If you do find any more in your own search, would you mind posting the link or reference here?

And thanks to Colin.

Patient renter in OC

[patientrenter]

nsr, great question. I’ve been following this thread… I hadn’t realized there was serious research done on this subject. If you do find any more in your own search, would you mind posting the link or reference here?

And thanks to Colin.

Patient renter in OC

[no_such_reality]

Patient Renter, if you haven’t read it or seen it, be sure to look through HSBC research Froth Finding Mission

Per your 1% of 1% discussion point in another thread, you may like CapGemini’s “World Wealth Report” There are only 9.5 households with net worth in excess of $1 million excluding their principle residence. Ultra high net worth, $30M+, the people that can go and do whatever they want, only number 95,000. Similarly, the top 1% of people in the world make a mere $50,000. The top 0.01%, $200,000. That’s a mere 715,000 people.

[no_such_reality]

Patient Renter, if you haven’t read it or seen it, be sure to look through HSBC research Froth Finding Mission

Per your 1% of 1% discussion point in another thread, you may like CapGemini’s “World Wealth Report” There are only 9.5 households with net worth in excess of $1 million excluding their principle residence. Ultra high net worth, $30M+, the people that can go and do whatever they want, only number 95,000. Similarly, the top 1% of people in the world make a mere $50,000. The top 0.01%, $200,000. That’s a mere 715,000 people.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Similarly, the top 1% of people in the world make a mere $50,000. The top 0.01%, $200,000. That’s a mere 715,000 people.

Where did the 715,000 number come from ?
As of 1995, the Census bureau has over 3 Million households in the US alone making over $200,000.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Similarly, the top 1% of people in the world make a mere $50,000. The top 0.01%, $200,000. That’s a mere 715,000 people.

Where did the 715,000 number come from ?
As of 1995, the Census bureau has over 3 Million households in the US alone making over $200,000.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

n_s_r – This is an interesting report. I think it might explain the long term trend (e.g. 40 years) of certain metro areas outperforming the rest of the country. But it does not attempt to explain the cyclical changes in the 7-10 year cycle in which we are currently experiencing a decline. If the thesis holds true, we should see a higher bottom than last time for these areas.

We shall see.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

n_s_r – This is an interesting report. I think it might explain the long term trend (e.g. 40 years) of certain metro areas outperforming the rest of the country. But it does not attempt to explain the cyclical changes in the 7-10 year cycle in which we are currently experiencing a decline. If the thesis holds true, we should see a higher bottom than last time for these areas.

We shall see.

[no_such_reality]

Where did the 715,000 number come from ?
As of 1995, the Census bureau has over 3 Million households in the US alone making over $200,000.

A global poverty site, it’s obviously wrong. Actually, it referrred to persons and not households. So…

Finding wealth and more importantly, income stats is extremely difficult.

[no_such_reality]

Where did the 715,000 number come from ?
As of 1995, the Census bureau has over 3 Million households in the US alone making over $200,000.

A global poverty site, it’s obviously wrong. Actually, it referrred to persons and not households. So…

Finding wealth and more importantly, income stats is extremely difficult.

[Author]

Posts