- This topic has 40 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 12 months ago by
OC Burns.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 26, 2008 at 6:39 AM #11934February 26, 2008 at 7:27 AM #160071
GoUSC
ParticipantThat is the worst written article I have read in a long time. It sets its theme in the first few paragraphs that middle-class millionaire are slowing/halting consumption on luxury goods. Then is proceeds to spend the next 5+ paragraphs saying, “But they won’t stop buying this because… and they won’t stop buying this because…”.
Worthless.
February 26, 2008 at 7:27 AM #160465GoUSC
ParticipantThat is the worst written article I have read in a long time. It sets its theme in the first few paragraphs that middle-class millionaire are slowing/halting consumption on luxury goods. Then is proceeds to spend the next 5+ paragraphs saying, “But they won’t stop buying this because… and they won’t stop buying this because…”.
Worthless.
February 26, 2008 at 7:27 AM #160387GoUSC
ParticipantThat is the worst written article I have read in a long time. It sets its theme in the first few paragraphs that middle-class millionaire are slowing/halting consumption on luxury goods. Then is proceeds to spend the next 5+ paragraphs saying, “But they won’t stop buying this because… and they won’t stop buying this because…”.
Worthless.
February 26, 2008 at 7:27 AM #160384GoUSC
ParticipantThat is the worst written article I have read in a long time. It sets its theme in the first few paragraphs that middle-class millionaire are slowing/halting consumption on luxury goods. Then is proceeds to spend the next 5+ paragraphs saying, “But they won’t stop buying this because… and they won’t stop buying this because…”.
Worthless.
February 26, 2008 at 7:27 AM #160368GoUSC
ParticipantThat is the worst written article I have read in a long time. It sets its theme in the first few paragraphs that middle-class millionaire are slowing/halting consumption on luxury goods. Then is proceeds to spend the next 5+ paragraphs saying, “But they won’t stop buying this because… and they won’t stop buying this because…”.
Worthless.
February 26, 2008 at 7:55 AM #160481Anonymous
GuestYes, that’s an odd piece. Most of the people shopping at ‘high end’ retail stores are not the ‘mass affluent’ in my opinion, but predominantly middle class individuals trying desperately to achieve an image of wealth (and that is the literal ‘american dream’ of the moment).
February 26, 2008 at 7:55 AM #160402Anonymous
GuestYes, that’s an odd piece. Most of the people shopping at ‘high end’ retail stores are not the ‘mass affluent’ in my opinion, but predominantly middle class individuals trying desperately to achieve an image of wealth (and that is the literal ‘american dream’ of the moment).
February 26, 2008 at 7:55 AM #160398Anonymous
GuestYes, that’s an odd piece. Most of the people shopping at ‘high end’ retail stores are not the ‘mass affluent’ in my opinion, but predominantly middle class individuals trying desperately to achieve an image of wealth (and that is the literal ‘american dream’ of the moment).
February 26, 2008 at 7:55 AM #160383Anonymous
GuestYes, that’s an odd piece. Most of the people shopping at ‘high end’ retail stores are not the ‘mass affluent’ in my opinion, but predominantly middle class individuals trying desperately to achieve an image of wealth (and that is the literal ‘american dream’ of the moment).
February 26, 2008 at 7:55 AM #160088Anonymous
GuestYes, that’s an odd piece. Most of the people shopping at ‘high end’ retail stores are not the ‘mass affluent’ in my opinion, but predominantly middle class individuals trying desperately to achieve an image of wealth (and that is the literal ‘american dream’ of the moment).
February 26, 2008 at 10:39 AM #160561raptorduck
ParticipantAgree with the comments. I would add that the definition should not stop at $10 million for the upper level, but say that goes to $20 million in net worth. Above that, you really do have financial freedom and ability not to have to work really. Below that I am not so sure.
February 26, 2008 at 10:39 AM #160166raptorduck
ParticipantAgree with the comments. I would add that the definition should not stop at $10 million for the upper level, but say that goes to $20 million in net worth. Above that, you really do have financial freedom and ability not to have to work really. Below that I am not so sure.
February 26, 2008 at 10:39 AM #160463raptorduck
ParticipantAgree with the comments. I would add that the definition should not stop at $10 million for the upper level, but say that goes to $20 million in net worth. Above that, you really do have financial freedom and ability not to have to work really. Below that I am not so sure.
February 26, 2008 at 10:39 AM #160478raptorduck
ParticipantAgree with the comments. I would add that the definition should not stop at $10 million for the upper level, but say that goes to $20 million in net worth. Above that, you really do have financial freedom and ability not to have to work really. Below that I am not so sure.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.