Mandolin Del Sur

[PadreBrian]

The MR is broken down on your bill, if you are so inclined you could break it out and deduct the stuff that doesn’t increase value on the property. This is a moot point anyway, most people just use the amount on their 1098 which is reported to the IRS by the bank.

[CA renter]

[quote=UCGal]Way back in the pre-MelloRoos days developers had to kick in for some of these things. I live in University City – developers had to kick in for the Regents Road bridge (that still isn’t built due to NIMBYism.). That money is still sitting, escrowed, in the city coffers while various factions fight over it. Developers also had to kick in towards building Curie, Marcy (now gone), Standley M.S., and UCHS. It was part of getting the development approved – the developers had to kick in for infrastructure. It didn’t mean this stuff got built in a timely fashion… Standley was 5 years behind the developers promises, UCHS about 10 years behind it.

Then they came up with a way to pass that on, more directly, to the homeowner… [/quote]

Exactly, UCGal.

Mello-Roos benefit the developers **and the landowners** who sell to the developers. Developers can pay more for the raw land because the infrastructure and improvements don’t add to their cost basis when stupid buyers are willing to shoulder these costs.

If I were to buy a house with MR, I’d demand the builder/developer pay it off first. You can do that, or deduct the amount of total MR assessment from the price and pay it off yourself, IIRC.

[CA renter]

[quote=UCGal]Way back in the pre-MelloRoos days developers had to kick in for some of these things. I live in University City – developers had to kick in for the Regents Road bridge (that still isn’t built due to NIMBYism.). That money is still sitting, escrowed, in the city coffers while various factions fight over it. Developers also had to kick in towards building Curie, Marcy (now gone), Standley M.S., and UCHS. It was part of getting the development approved – the developers had to kick in for infrastructure. It didn’t mean this stuff got built in a timely fashion… Standley was 5 years behind the developers promises, UCHS about 10 years behind it.

Then they came up with a way to pass that on, more directly, to the homeowner… [/quote]

Exactly, UCGal.

Mello-Roos benefit the developers **and the landowners** who sell to the developers. Developers can pay more for the raw land because the infrastructure and improvements don’t add to their cost basis when stupid buyers are willing to shoulder these costs.

If I were to buy a house with MR, I’d demand the builder/developer pay it off first. You can do that, or deduct the amount of total MR assessment from the price and pay it off yourself, IIRC.

[CA renter]

[quote=UCGal]Way back in the pre-MelloRoos days developers had to kick in for some of these things. I live in University City – developers had to kick in for the Regents Road bridge (that still isn’t built due to NIMBYism.). That money is still sitting, escrowed, in the city coffers while various factions fight over it. Developers also had to kick in towards building Curie, Marcy (now gone), Standley M.S., and UCHS. It was part of getting the development approved – the developers had to kick in for infrastructure. It didn’t mean this stuff got built in a timely fashion… Standley was 5 years behind the developers promises, UCHS about 10 years behind it.

Then they came up with a way to pass that on, more directly, to the homeowner… [/quote]

Exactly, UCGal.

Mello-Roos benefit the developers **and the landowners** who sell to the developers. Developers can pay more for the raw land because the infrastructure and improvements don’t add to their cost basis when stupid buyers are willing to shoulder these costs.

If I were to buy a house with MR, I’d demand the builder/developer pay it off first. You can do that, or deduct the amount of total MR assessment from the price and pay it off yourself, IIRC.

[CA renter]

[quote=UCGal]Way back in the pre-MelloRoos days developers had to kick in for some of these things. I live in University City – developers had to kick in for the Regents Road bridge (that still isn’t built due to NIMBYism.). That money is still sitting, escrowed, in the city coffers while various factions fight over it. Developers also had to kick in towards building Curie, Marcy (now gone), Standley M.S., and UCHS. It was part of getting the development approved – the developers had to kick in for infrastructure. It didn’t mean this stuff got built in a timely fashion… Standley was 5 years behind the developers promises, UCHS about 10 years behind it.

Then they came up with a way to pass that on, more directly, to the homeowner… [/quote]

Exactly, UCGal.

Mello-Roos benefit the developers **and the landowners** who sell to the developers. Developers can pay more for the raw land because the infrastructure and improvements don’t add to their cost basis when stupid buyers are willing to shoulder these costs.

If I were to buy a house with MR, I’d demand the builder/developer pay it off first. You can do that, or deduct the amount of total MR assessment from the price and pay it off yourself, IIRC.

[CA renter]

[quote=UCGal]Way back in the pre-MelloRoos days developers had to kick in for some of these things. I live in University City – developers had to kick in for the Regents Road bridge (that still isn’t built due to NIMBYism.). That money is still sitting, escrowed, in the city coffers while various factions fight over it. Developers also had to kick in towards building Curie, Marcy (now gone), Standley M.S., and UCHS. It was part of getting the development approved – the developers had to kick in for infrastructure. It didn’t mean this stuff got built in a timely fashion… Standley was 5 years behind the developers promises, UCHS about 10 years behind it.

Then they came up with a way to pass that on, more directly, to the homeowner… [/quote]

Exactly, UCGal.

Mello-Roos benefit the developers **and the landowners** who sell to the developers. Developers can pay more for the raw land because the infrastructure and improvements don’t add to their cost basis when stupid buyers are willing to shoulder these costs.

If I were to buy a house with MR, I’d demand the builder/developer pay it off first. You can do that, or deduct the amount of total MR assessment from the price and pay it off yourself, IIRC.

[Author]

Posts