Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Man-cession
- This topic has 235 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
temeculaguy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 8, 2009 at 1:53 PM #466683October 8, 2009 at 2:33 PM #465897
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=Russell]Sorry about the thread jack TG, all I could think to talk about today was to either football,breasts or child care, Real estate was was little off the map. I just must stay away from politics. I don’t usually go on about breasts publicly, and nobody likes what I say about football.[/quote]
No apology needed russell, I guess I never put much thought into child care, I used real state to solve that problem a long time ago and bought a house in walking distance to both sets of my kids grandparents (and some people wonder why I live here, that’ss the #1 reason). I guess this luxury allows for more time to ponder football and breasts.
October 8, 2009 at 2:33 PM #466084Participant[quote=Russell]Sorry about the thread jack TG, all I could think to talk about today was to either football,breasts or child care, Real estate was was little off the map. I just must stay away from politics. I don’t usually go on about breasts publicly, and nobody likes what I say about football.[/quote]
No apology needed russell, I guess I never put much thought into child care, I used real state to solve that problem a long time ago and bought a house in walking distance to both sets of my kids grandparents (and some people wonder why I live here, that’ss the #1 reason). I guess this luxury allows for more time to ponder football and breasts.
October 8, 2009 at 2:33 PM #466441Participant[quote=Russell]Sorry about the thread jack TG, all I could think to talk about today was to either football,breasts or child care, Real estate was was little off the map. I just must stay away from politics. I don’t usually go on about breasts publicly, and nobody likes what I say about football.[/quote]
No apology needed russell, I guess I never put much thought into child care, I used real state to solve that problem a long time ago and bought a house in walking distance to both sets of my kids grandparents (and some people wonder why I live here, that’ss the #1 reason). I guess this luxury allows for more time to ponder football and breasts.
October 8, 2009 at 2:33 PM #466514Participant[quote=Russell]Sorry about the thread jack TG, all I could think to talk about today was to either football,breasts or child care, Real estate was was little off the map. I just must stay away from politics. I don’t usually go on about breasts publicly, and nobody likes what I say about football.[/quote]
No apology needed russell, I guess I never put much thought into child care, I used real state to solve that problem a long time ago and bought a house in walking distance to both sets of my kids grandparents (and some people wonder why I live here, that’ss the #1 reason). I guess this luxury allows for more time to ponder football and breasts.
October 8, 2009 at 2:33 PM #466719Participant[quote=Russell]Sorry about the thread jack TG, all I could think to talk about today was to either football,breasts or child care, Real estate was was little off the map. I just must stay away from politics. I don’t usually go on about breasts publicly, and nobody likes what I say about football.[/quote]
No apology needed russell, I guess I never put much thought into child care, I used real state to solve that problem a long time ago and bought a house in walking distance to both sets of my kids grandparents (and some people wonder why I live here, that’ss the #1 reason). I guess this luxury allows for more time to ponder football and breasts.
October 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM #465907Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantGetting back to the original topic ,
Maybe it is because there are very few women in Construction Job’s
Mystery solved.
October 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM #466094ParticipantGetting back to the original topic ,
Maybe it is because there are very few women in Construction Job’s
Mystery solved.
October 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM #466451ParticipantGetting back to the original topic ,
Maybe it is because there are very few women in Construction Job’s
Mystery solved.
October 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM #466524ParticipantGetting back to the original topic ,
Maybe it is because there are very few women in Construction Job’s
Mystery solved.
October 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM #466729ParticipantGetting back to the original topic ,
Maybe it is because there are very few women in Construction Job’s
Mystery solved.
October 8, 2009 at 3:01 PM #465912Participant[quote=temeculaguy]And bringing this back to the uneven unemployment numbers and away from child care, how is this to affect low end/smaller rentals or certain neighborhoods. Will it treat sfr’s differently. It would seem that the unemployment numbers are not affecting everyone the same and there is a demographic element to the various housing markets. Could the racial inequities of the unemployment numbers be the reason certain communities are sticky in price, while others are not? There’s something there, it’s just not plain as day. It is causing me to rethink my plan to buy a small aprtmentish/condoish rental in a low end neighborhood (where I find the best values and ROI). Since married, non-minority women are the least affected by the unemployment rise, and demographicly as a group they value schools and crime rates probably more than other groups, I think if you look at the demographics of those communities that are sticky, you’ll find low crime and good schools. In bad times it seems important to know who is unemployed, just as much as how many. It may also back up some recent posts about bread and butter rental communities being in the mid level and not the lowest, even if I like the numbers better because others are afraid.
Forget trying to fix scardey, he is who he is and his name is fitting, at least he realizes he can’t make a decision without some level of regret.[/quote]
Very hard now but in the beginning of the year you could find SFH’s that would cash flow under $1000.0
In decent area’s (not real good but not horrible either), my guess that is the Home Depot job type ceiling.And I would agree about apartments and to a lesser extent Condo’s, but low end SFH’s are a hot rental market or just very in demand period..
October 8, 2009 at 3:01 PM #466099Participant[quote=temeculaguy]And bringing this back to the uneven unemployment numbers and away from child care, how is this to affect low end/smaller rentals or certain neighborhoods. Will it treat sfr’s differently. It would seem that the unemployment numbers are not affecting everyone the same and there is a demographic element to the various housing markets. Could the racial inequities of the unemployment numbers be the reason certain communities are sticky in price, while others are not? There’s something there, it’s just not plain as day. It is causing me to rethink my plan to buy a small aprtmentish/condoish rental in a low end neighborhood (where I find the best values and ROI). Since married, non-minority women are the least affected by the unemployment rise, and demographicly as a group they value schools and crime rates probably more than other groups, I think if you look at the demographics of those communities that are sticky, you’ll find low crime and good schools. In bad times it seems important to know who is unemployed, just as much as how many. It may also back up some recent posts about bread and butter rental communities being in the mid level and not the lowest, even if I like the numbers better because others are afraid.
Forget trying to fix scardey, he is who he is and his name is fitting, at least he realizes he can’t make a decision without some level of regret.[/quote]
Very hard now but in the beginning of the year you could find SFH’s that would cash flow under $1000.0
In decent area’s (not real good but not horrible either), my guess that is the Home Depot job type ceiling.And I would agree about apartments and to a lesser extent Condo’s, but low end SFH’s are a hot rental market or just very in demand period..
October 8, 2009 at 3:01 PM #466456Participant[quote=temeculaguy]And bringing this back to the uneven unemployment numbers and away from child care, how is this to affect low end/smaller rentals or certain neighborhoods. Will it treat sfr’s differently. It would seem that the unemployment numbers are not affecting everyone the same and there is a demographic element to the various housing markets. Could the racial inequities of the unemployment numbers be the reason certain communities are sticky in price, while others are not? There’s something there, it’s just not plain as day. It is causing me to rethink my plan to buy a small aprtmentish/condoish rental in a low end neighborhood (where I find the best values and ROI). Since married, non-minority women are the least affected by the unemployment rise, and demographicly as a group they value schools and crime rates probably more than other groups, I think if you look at the demographics of those communities that are sticky, you’ll find low crime and good schools. In bad times it seems important to know who is unemployed, just as much as how many. It may also back up some recent posts about bread and butter rental communities being in the mid level and not the lowest, even if I like the numbers better because others are afraid.
Forget trying to fix scardey, he is who he is and his name is fitting, at least he realizes he can’t make a decision without some level of regret.[/quote]
Very hard now but in the beginning of the year you could find SFH’s that would cash flow under $1000.0
In decent area’s (not real good but not horrible either), my guess that is the Home Depot job type ceiling.And I would agree about apartments and to a lesser extent Condo’s, but low end SFH’s are a hot rental market or just very in demand period..
October 8, 2009 at 3:01 PM #466529Participant[quote=temeculaguy]And bringing this back to the uneven unemployment numbers and away from child care, how is this to affect low end/smaller rentals or certain neighborhoods. Will it treat sfr’s differently. It would seem that the unemployment numbers are not affecting everyone the same and there is a demographic element to the various housing markets. Could the racial inequities of the unemployment numbers be the reason certain communities are sticky in price, while others are not? There’s something there, it’s just not plain as day. It is causing me to rethink my plan to buy a small aprtmentish/condoish rental in a low end neighborhood (where I find the best values and ROI). Since married, non-minority women are the least affected by the unemployment rise, and demographicly as a group they value schools and crime rates probably more than other groups, I think if you look at the demographics of those communities that are sticky, you’ll find low crime and good schools. In bad times it seems important to know who is unemployed, just as much as how many. It may also back up some recent posts about bread and butter rental communities being in the mid level and not the lowest, even if I like the numbers better because others are afraid.
Forget trying to fix scardey, he is who he is and his name is fitting, at least he realizes he can’t make a decision without some level of regret.[/quote]
Very hard now but in the beginning of the year you could find SFH’s that would cash flow under $1000.0
In decent area’s (not real good but not horrible either), my guess that is the Home Depot job type ceiling.And I would agree about apartments and to a lesser extent Condo’s, but low end SFH’s are a hot rental market or just very in demand period..
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.