Menu

Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Magic on Triton ST 92011

Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
1 2
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 2, 2008 at 11:54 AM #163746
    ocrenter
    Participant

    no one is saying there are wrong doings or that anyone are crooks.

    just interesting that the developer can sell a home without flooring for $250k over his model home when the market is heading south.

    March 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM #163338
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    It’s funny Rus cuz I think you were the first people to question/warn about me posting stuff that is on the tax rolls way back when. Now all this lawsuit stuff is getting me more spooked and I am rethinking your advice. I will most likely continue to post about stuff like that but will not speculate on anything with an opinion. Just post the fact of what is recorded and leave it at that. Looks like you were on the money.

    The Sparren listing in the other thread was a good example, I knew about the status but didn’t want to say anything until someone else already did as that is a material fact of the situation.

    SD Realtor

    March 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM #163648
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    It’s funny Rus cuz I think you were the first people to question/warn about me posting stuff that is on the tax rolls way back when. Now all this lawsuit stuff is getting me more spooked and I am rethinking your advice. I will most likely continue to post about stuff like that but will not speculate on anything with an opinion. Just post the fact of what is recorded and leave it at that. Looks like you were on the money.

    The Sparren listing in the other thread was a good example, I knew about the status but didn’t want to say anything until someone else already did as that is a material fact of the situation.

    SD Realtor

    March 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM #163659
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    It’s funny Rus cuz I think you were the first people to question/warn about me posting stuff that is on the tax rolls way back when. Now all this lawsuit stuff is getting me more spooked and I am rethinking your advice. I will most likely continue to post about stuff like that but will not speculate on anything with an opinion. Just post the fact of what is recorded and leave it at that. Looks like you were on the money.

    The Sparren listing in the other thread was a good example, I knew about the status but didn’t want to say anything until someone else already did as that is a material fact of the situation.

    SD Realtor

    March 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM #163670
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    It’s funny Rus cuz I think you were the first people to question/warn about me posting stuff that is on the tax rolls way back when. Now all this lawsuit stuff is getting me more spooked and I am rethinking your advice. I will most likely continue to post about stuff like that but will not speculate on anything with an opinion. Just post the fact of what is recorded and leave it at that. Looks like you were on the money.

    The Sparren listing in the other thread was a good example, I knew about the status but didn’t want to say anything until someone else already did as that is a material fact of the situation.

    SD Realtor

    March 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM #163752
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    It’s funny Rus cuz I think you were the first people to question/warn about me posting stuff that is on the tax rolls way back when. Now all this lawsuit stuff is getting me more spooked and I am rethinking your advice. I will most likely continue to post about stuff like that but will not speculate on anything with an opinion. Just post the fact of what is recorded and leave it at that. Looks like you were on the money.

    The Sparren listing in the other thread was a good example, I knew about the status but didn’t want to say anything until someone else already did as that is a material fact of the situation.

    SD Realtor

    March 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM #163363
    NotCranky
    Participant

    SDR,
    Yeah it seemed to me that you backed off a while back. I never thought you meant to hassle anyone. The info seems pertinent but it is too sensitive to treat lightly.IMO.

    Ocrenter,
    Don’t kid yourself, you are exposing fraudsters, if not you are going to “accidentally”. Hate to see you have a problem.

    March 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM #163673
    NotCranky
    Participant

    SDR,
    Yeah it seemed to me that you backed off a while back. I never thought you meant to hassle anyone. The info seems pertinent but it is too sensitive to treat lightly.IMO.

    Ocrenter,
    Don’t kid yourself, you are exposing fraudsters, if not you are going to “accidentally”. Hate to see you have a problem.

    March 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM #163684
    NotCranky
    Participant

    SDR,
    Yeah it seemed to me that you backed off a while back. I never thought you meant to hassle anyone. The info seems pertinent but it is too sensitive to treat lightly.IMO.

    Ocrenter,
    Don’t kid yourself, you are exposing fraudsters, if not you are going to “accidentally”. Hate to see you have a problem.

    March 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM #163695
    NotCranky
    Participant

    SDR,
    Yeah it seemed to me that you backed off a while back. I never thought you meant to hassle anyone. The info seems pertinent but it is too sensitive to treat lightly.IMO.

    Ocrenter,
    Don’t kid yourself, you are exposing fraudsters, if not you are going to “accidentally”. Hate to see you have a problem.

    March 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM #163778
    NotCranky
    Participant

    SDR,
    Yeah it seemed to me that you backed off a while back. I never thought you meant to hassle anyone. The info seems pertinent but it is too sensitive to treat lightly.IMO.

    Ocrenter,
    Don’t kid yourself, you are exposing fraudsters, if not you are going to “accidentally”. Hate to see you have a problem.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
1 2
  • The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.