Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Magic on Triton ST 92011
- This topic has 25 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 2, 2008 at 10:27 AM #11977
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:26 AM #163324
SD Realtor
ParticipantFarbet what exactly do you want to know from the tax roll? The blogspot article speaks for itself. FBs bought at the peak and now they are losing their homes.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:43 AM #163329
NotCranky
ParticipantIf I were the guy running that blog I think I would worry about something worse than getting sued happening. Making fun of people who make foolish mistakes, like many on this blog do is one thing, making fun of crooks is another.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:54 AM #163333
ocrenter
Participantno one is saying there are wrong doings or that anyone are crooks.
just interesting that the developer can sell a home without flooring for $250k over his model home when the market is heading south.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:54 AM #163643Participant
no one is saying there are wrong doings or that anyone are crooks.
just interesting that the developer can sell a home without flooring for $250k over his model home when the market is heading south.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:54 AM #163654Participant
no one is saying there are wrong doings or that anyone are crooks.
just interesting that the developer can sell a home without flooring for $250k over his model home when the market is heading south.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:54 AM #163665Participant
no one is saying there are wrong doings or that anyone are crooks.
just interesting that the developer can sell a home without flooring for $250k over his model home when the market is heading south.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:54 AM #163746Participant
no one is saying there are wrong doings or that anyone are crooks.
just interesting that the developer can sell a home without flooring for $250k over his model home when the market is heading south.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM #163338Participant
It’s funny Rus cuz I think you were the first people to question/warn about me posting stuff that is on the tax rolls way back when. Now all this lawsuit stuff is getting me more spooked and I am rethinking your advice. I will most likely continue to post about stuff like that but will not speculate on anything with an opinion. Just post the fact of what is recorded and leave it at that. Looks like you were on the money.
The Sparren listing in the other thread was a good example, I knew about the status but didn’t want to say anything until someone else already did as that is a material fact of the situation.
SD Realtor
-
March 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM #163363Participant
SDR,
Yeah it seemed to me that you backed off a while back. I never thought you meant to hassle anyone. The info seems pertinent but it is too sensitive to treat lightly.IMO.Ocrenter,
Don’t kid yourself, you are exposing fraudsters, if not you are going to “accidentally”. Hate to see you have a problem. -
March 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM #163673Participant
SDR,
Yeah it seemed to me that you backed off a while back. I never thought you meant to hassle anyone. The info seems pertinent but it is too sensitive to treat lightly.IMO.Ocrenter,
Don’t kid yourself, you are exposing fraudsters, if not you are going to “accidentally”. Hate to see you have a problem. -
March 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM #163684Participant
SDR,
Yeah it seemed to me that you backed off a while back. I never thought you meant to hassle anyone. The info seems pertinent but it is too sensitive to treat lightly.IMO.Ocrenter,
Don’t kid yourself, you are exposing fraudsters, if not you are going to “accidentally”. Hate to see you have a problem. -
March 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM #163695Participant
SDR,
Yeah it seemed to me that you backed off a while back. I never thought you meant to hassle anyone. The info seems pertinent but it is too sensitive to treat lightly.IMO.Ocrenter,
Don’t kid yourself, you are exposing fraudsters, if not you are going to “accidentally”. Hate to see you have a problem. -
March 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM #163778Participant
SDR,
Yeah it seemed to me that you backed off a while back. I never thought you meant to hassle anyone. The info seems pertinent but it is too sensitive to treat lightly.IMO.Ocrenter,
Don’t kid yourself, you are exposing fraudsters, if not you are going to “accidentally”. Hate to see you have a problem. -
March 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM #163648Participant
It’s funny Rus cuz I think you were the first people to question/warn about me posting stuff that is on the tax rolls way back when. Now all this lawsuit stuff is getting me more spooked and I am rethinking your advice. I will most likely continue to post about stuff like that but will not speculate on anything with an opinion. Just post the fact of what is recorded and leave it at that. Looks like you were on the money.
The Sparren listing in the other thread was a good example, I knew about the status but didn’t want to say anything until someone else already did as that is a material fact of the situation.
SD Realtor
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM #163659Participant
It’s funny Rus cuz I think you were the first people to question/warn about me posting stuff that is on the tax rolls way back when. Now all this lawsuit stuff is getting me more spooked and I am rethinking your advice. I will most likely continue to post about stuff like that but will not speculate on anything with an opinion. Just post the fact of what is recorded and leave it at that. Looks like you were on the money.
The Sparren listing in the other thread was a good example, I knew about the status but didn’t want to say anything until someone else already did as that is a material fact of the situation.
SD Realtor
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM #163670Participant
It’s funny Rus cuz I think you were the first people to question/warn about me posting stuff that is on the tax rolls way back when. Now all this lawsuit stuff is getting me more spooked and I am rethinking your advice. I will most likely continue to post about stuff like that but will not speculate on anything with an opinion. Just post the fact of what is recorded and leave it at that. Looks like you were on the money.
The Sparren listing in the other thread was a good example, I knew about the status but didn’t want to say anything until someone else already did as that is a material fact of the situation.
SD Realtor
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM #163752Participant
It’s funny Rus cuz I think you were the first people to question/warn about me posting stuff that is on the tax rolls way back when. Now all this lawsuit stuff is getting me more spooked and I am rethinking your advice. I will most likely continue to post about stuff like that but will not speculate on anything with an opinion. Just post the fact of what is recorded and leave it at that. Looks like you were on the money.
The Sparren listing in the other thread was a good example, I knew about the status but didn’t want to say anything until someone else already did as that is a material fact of the situation.
SD Realtor
-
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:43 AM #163638Participant
If I were the guy running that blog I think I would worry about something worse than getting sued happening. Making fun of people who make foolish mistakes, like many on this blog do is one thing, making fun of crooks is another.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:43 AM #163649Participant
If I were the guy running that blog I think I would worry about something worse than getting sued happening. Making fun of people who make foolish mistakes, like many on this blog do is one thing, making fun of crooks is another.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:43 AM #163660Participant
If I were the guy running that blog I think I would worry about something worse than getting sued happening. Making fun of people who make foolish mistakes, like many on this blog do is one thing, making fun of crooks is another.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:43 AM #163742Participant
If I were the guy running that blog I think I would worry about something worse than getting sued happening. Making fun of people who make foolish mistakes, like many on this blog do is one thing, making fun of crooks is another.
-
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:26 AM #163633Participant
Farbet what exactly do you want to know from the tax roll? The blogspot article speaks for itself. FBs bought at the peak and now they are losing their homes.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:26 AM #163644Participant
Farbet what exactly do you want to know from the tax roll? The blogspot article speaks for itself. FBs bought at the peak and now they are losing their homes.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:26 AM #163655Participant
Farbet what exactly do you want to know from the tax roll? The blogspot article speaks for itself. FBs bought at the peak and now they are losing their homes.
-
March 2, 2008 at 11:26 AM #163737Participant
Farbet what exactly do you want to know from the tax roll? The blogspot article speaks for itself. FBs bought at the peak and now they are losing their homes.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.