- This topic has 315 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by svelte.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 10, 2009 at 9:57 AM #344373February 10, 2009 at 10:22 AM #343824Allan from FallbrookParticipant
Arraya: I agree (on both the ganja and the things are going to snap fronts).
What will be interesting is what form will the “snap” take? Rioting, armed insurrection or something more passive (labor slowdowns, employees, including local, state and government personnel, refusing to follow orders) are all potential possibilities.
We have been socialized to be passive and do as we’re told. How much longer will that last, especially in the face of this onslaught?
February 10, 2009 at 10:22 AM #344144Allan from FallbrookParticipantArraya: I agree (on both the ganja and the things are going to snap fronts).
What will be interesting is what form will the “snap” take? Rioting, armed insurrection or something more passive (labor slowdowns, employees, including local, state and government personnel, refusing to follow orders) are all potential possibilities.
We have been socialized to be passive and do as we’re told. How much longer will that last, especially in the face of this onslaught?
February 10, 2009 at 10:22 AM #344250Allan from FallbrookParticipantArraya: I agree (on both the ganja and the things are going to snap fronts).
What will be interesting is what form will the “snap” take? Rioting, armed insurrection or something more passive (labor slowdowns, employees, including local, state and government personnel, refusing to follow orders) are all potential possibilities.
We have been socialized to be passive and do as we’re told. How much longer will that last, especially in the face of this onslaught?
February 10, 2009 at 10:22 AM #344281Allan from FallbrookParticipantArraya: I agree (on both the ganja and the things are going to snap fronts).
What will be interesting is what form will the “snap” take? Rioting, armed insurrection or something more passive (labor slowdowns, employees, including local, state and government personnel, refusing to follow orders) are all potential possibilities.
We have been socialized to be passive and do as we’re told. How much longer will that last, especially in the face of this onslaught?
February 10, 2009 at 10:22 AM #344378Allan from FallbrookParticipantArraya: I agree (on both the ganja and the things are going to snap fronts).
What will be interesting is what form will the “snap” take? Rioting, armed insurrection or something more passive (labor slowdowns, employees, including local, state and government personnel, refusing to follow orders) are all potential possibilities.
We have been socialized to be passive and do as we’re told. How much longer will that last, especially in the face of this onslaught?
February 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM #343849macromaniacParticipantYou have to love these Realtors today…typical self interest all the time. I bet you it was time to buy in 2005 also because you could get an option ARM loan and cash flow your rental property that was 75% over valued.
Hey Dan, you ever study economics 101? By the way, please show us where it is best to buy right now and why along with average rents with a 15% to 20% rent fade built in over the next two years….cant wait to see that information.
February 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM #344169macromaniacParticipantYou have to love these Realtors today…typical self interest all the time. I bet you it was time to buy in 2005 also because you could get an option ARM loan and cash flow your rental property that was 75% over valued.
Hey Dan, you ever study economics 101? By the way, please show us where it is best to buy right now and why along with average rents with a 15% to 20% rent fade built in over the next two years….cant wait to see that information.
February 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM #344275macromaniacParticipantYou have to love these Realtors today…typical self interest all the time. I bet you it was time to buy in 2005 also because you could get an option ARM loan and cash flow your rental property that was 75% over valued.
Hey Dan, you ever study economics 101? By the way, please show us where it is best to buy right now and why along with average rents with a 15% to 20% rent fade built in over the next two years….cant wait to see that information.
February 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM #344306macromaniacParticipantYou have to love these Realtors today…typical self interest all the time. I bet you it was time to buy in 2005 also because you could get an option ARM loan and cash flow your rental property that was 75% over valued.
Hey Dan, you ever study economics 101? By the way, please show us where it is best to buy right now and why along with average rents with a 15% to 20% rent fade built in over the next two years….cant wait to see that information.
February 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM #344403macromaniacParticipantYou have to love these Realtors today…typical self interest all the time. I bet you it was time to buy in 2005 also because you could get an option ARM loan and cash flow your rental property that was 75% over valued.
Hey Dan, you ever study economics 101? By the way, please show us where it is best to buy right now and why along with average rents with a 15% to 20% rent fade built in over the next two years….cant wait to see that information.
February 10, 2009 at 10:55 AM #343854NotCrankyParticipantDan, As you know, good portion of the housing stock in your neck of the woods went up more percentage wise than the rest of San Diego. 40% off, here and there, is not as significant. Many went up 300%- -400%-500% in a decade. I should probably prepare a better summary but I am skeptical of anything like a floor, in anything like broad terms for the central urban areas. 92104,92114,92113, some areas of 92102 look a little more like real buyer’s markets if you are including those. You must be to draw such conclusions?
92103 Det, active,pending
78/18
Five or more have been pending for more than 6 months.Condos are not doing well either.92116 Det/Active,pending 78/28
Be very wary of condos in 92116. They have fallen quickly for good reasons. One should only take some of these things at rock bottom prices if at all IMO.I also am qualified to make anecdotal guesses on this area as I lived in , owned,shopped, built,bought and sold a few places there beginning in the mid 80’s until 2004. Pain train is likely still coming for many properties.
I’ll still smoke some “chronic” with you though.
February 10, 2009 at 10:55 AM #344174NotCrankyParticipantDan, As you know, good portion of the housing stock in your neck of the woods went up more percentage wise than the rest of San Diego. 40% off, here and there, is not as significant. Many went up 300%- -400%-500% in a decade. I should probably prepare a better summary but I am skeptical of anything like a floor, in anything like broad terms for the central urban areas. 92104,92114,92113, some areas of 92102 look a little more like real buyer’s markets if you are including those. You must be to draw such conclusions?
92103 Det, active,pending
78/18
Five or more have been pending for more than 6 months.Condos are not doing well either.92116 Det/Active,pending 78/28
Be very wary of condos in 92116. They have fallen quickly for good reasons. One should only take some of these things at rock bottom prices if at all IMO.I also am qualified to make anecdotal guesses on this area as I lived in , owned,shopped, built,bought and sold a few places there beginning in the mid 80’s until 2004. Pain train is likely still coming for many properties.
I’ll still smoke some “chronic” with you though.
February 10, 2009 at 10:55 AM #344280NotCrankyParticipantDan, As you know, good portion of the housing stock in your neck of the woods went up more percentage wise than the rest of San Diego. 40% off, here and there, is not as significant. Many went up 300%- -400%-500% in a decade. I should probably prepare a better summary but I am skeptical of anything like a floor, in anything like broad terms for the central urban areas. 92104,92114,92113, some areas of 92102 look a little more like real buyer’s markets if you are including those. You must be to draw such conclusions?
92103 Det, active,pending
78/18
Five or more have been pending for more than 6 months.Condos are not doing well either.92116 Det/Active,pending 78/28
Be very wary of condos in 92116. They have fallen quickly for good reasons. One should only take some of these things at rock bottom prices if at all IMO.I also am qualified to make anecdotal guesses on this area as I lived in , owned,shopped, built,bought and sold a few places there beginning in the mid 80’s until 2004. Pain train is likely still coming for many properties.
I’ll still smoke some “chronic” with you though.
February 10, 2009 at 10:55 AM #344311NotCrankyParticipantDan, As you know, good portion of the housing stock in your neck of the woods went up more percentage wise than the rest of San Diego. 40% off, here and there, is not as significant. Many went up 300%- -400%-500% in a decade. I should probably prepare a better summary but I am skeptical of anything like a floor, in anything like broad terms for the central urban areas. 92104,92114,92113, some areas of 92102 look a little more like real buyer’s markets if you are including those. You must be to draw such conclusions?
92103 Det, active,pending
78/18
Five or more have been pending for more than 6 months.Condos are not doing well either.92116 Det/Active,pending 78/28
Be very wary of condos in 92116. They have fallen quickly for good reasons. One should only take some of these things at rock bottom prices if at all IMO.I also am qualified to make anecdotal guesses on this area as I lived in , owned,shopped, built,bought and sold a few places there beginning in the mid 80’s until 2004. Pain train is likely still coming for many properties.
I’ll still smoke some “chronic” with you though.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.