- This topic has 420 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by CDMA ENG.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 21, 2010 at 4:39 PM #505221January 21, 2010 at 4:42 PM #504335AnonymousGuest
If you don’t like paying for Jose’s kid, then why are you OK with paying for Joe’s kid?
Lots of people without kids of their own like to make the “why should I pay taxes so your kid can go to school?” argument. (I personally never agreed with this, even before I had kids).
The common argument for public education is that these kids will eventually become adults in the community. And an educated population benefits everyone.
Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.
Regrettably, I agree that we can’t afford to help Juanita (outside of personal charity).
January 21, 2010 at 4:42 PM #504478AnonymousGuestIf you don’t like paying for Jose’s kid, then why are you OK with paying for Joe’s kid?
Lots of people without kids of their own like to make the “why should I pay taxes so your kid can go to school?” argument. (I personally never agreed with this, even before I had kids).
The common argument for public education is that these kids will eventually become adults in the community. And an educated population benefits everyone.
Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.
Regrettably, I agree that we can’t afford to help Juanita (outside of personal charity).
January 21, 2010 at 4:42 PM #504879AnonymousGuestIf you don’t like paying for Jose’s kid, then why are you OK with paying for Joe’s kid?
Lots of people without kids of their own like to make the “why should I pay taxes so your kid can go to school?” argument. (I personally never agreed with this, even before I had kids).
The common argument for public education is that these kids will eventually become adults in the community. And an educated population benefits everyone.
Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.
Regrettably, I agree that we can’t afford to help Juanita (outside of personal charity).
January 21, 2010 at 4:42 PM #504972AnonymousGuestIf you don’t like paying for Jose’s kid, then why are you OK with paying for Joe’s kid?
Lots of people without kids of their own like to make the “why should I pay taxes so your kid can go to school?” argument. (I personally never agreed with this, even before I had kids).
The common argument for public education is that these kids will eventually become adults in the community. And an educated population benefits everyone.
Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.
Regrettably, I agree that we can’t afford to help Juanita (outside of personal charity).
January 21, 2010 at 4:42 PM #505225AnonymousGuestIf you don’t like paying for Jose’s kid, then why are you OK with paying for Joe’s kid?
Lots of people without kids of their own like to make the “why should I pay taxes so your kid can go to school?” argument. (I personally never agreed with this, even before I had kids).
The common argument for public education is that these kids will eventually become adults in the community. And an educated population benefits everyone.
Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.
Regrettably, I agree that we can’t afford to help Juanita (outside of personal charity).
January 21, 2010 at 4:50 PM #504345KSMountainParticipant[quote=Russell]If there was anyone who could threaten to make that kind of equality nearly universal he would be killed.[/quote]
Interesting observation.
January 21, 2010 at 4:50 PM #504487KSMountainParticipant[quote=Russell]If there was anyone who could threaten to make that kind of equality nearly universal he would be killed.[/quote]
Interesting observation.
January 21, 2010 at 4:50 PM #504889KSMountainParticipant[quote=Russell]If there was anyone who could threaten to make that kind of equality nearly universal he would be killed.[/quote]
Interesting observation.
January 21, 2010 at 4:50 PM #504982KSMountainParticipant[quote=Russell]If there was anyone who could threaten to make that kind of equality nearly universal he would be killed.[/quote]
Interesting observation.
January 21, 2010 at 4:50 PM #505235KSMountainParticipant[quote=Russell]If there was anyone who could threaten to make that kind of equality nearly universal he would be killed.[/quote]
Interesting observation.
January 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM #504350KSMountainParticipant[quote=pri_dk]Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.[/quote]
Now *that* is a persuasive argument, to me.January 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM #504492KSMountainParticipant[quote=pri_dk]Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.[/quote]
Now *that* is a persuasive argument, to me.January 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM #504894KSMountainParticipant[quote=pri_dk]Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.[/quote]
Now *that* is a persuasive argument, to me.January 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM #504987KSMountainParticipant[quote=pri_dk]Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.[/quote]
Now *that* is a persuasive argument, to me. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.