- This topic has 80 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 2, 2008 at 10:07 PM #11696February 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM #147503Rich ToscanoKeymaster
I’m making this “sticky” at the top of the housing market forum topics list because it’s so awesome and I don’t want anyone to miss it in the wake of SuperBowl Sunday. Nice work as usual, esmith. (I’ll unstick it in a couple days.)
Perhaps people might find it instructive to look at this in combination with the November Case Shiller numbers to get an idea of where the “official” numbers may be headed: http://piggington.com/november_case_shiller_hpi_gets_spanked
For the most part it looks like a continuation of the trend, though a couple mid-level areas stabilized in esmith’s data.
Also interesting that the supposedly invulnerable “coast” region has been on a pretty steady decline of late. That’s the last bastion for the bulls.
If anyone wants to see a bigger version click the image then click “original.”
Rich
February 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM #147750Rich ToscanoKeymasterI’m making this “sticky” at the top of the housing market forum topics list because it’s so awesome and I don’t want anyone to miss it in the wake of SuperBowl Sunday. Nice work as usual, esmith. (I’ll unstick it in a couple days.)
Perhaps people might find it instructive to look at this in combination with the November Case Shiller numbers to get an idea of where the “official” numbers may be headed: http://piggington.com/november_case_shiller_hpi_gets_spanked
For the most part it looks like a continuation of the trend, though a couple mid-level areas stabilized in esmith’s data.
Also interesting that the supposedly invulnerable “coast” region has been on a pretty steady decline of late. That’s the last bastion for the bulls.
If anyone wants to see a bigger version click the image then click “original.”
Rich
February 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM #147775Rich ToscanoKeymasterI’m making this “sticky” at the top of the housing market forum topics list because it’s so awesome and I don’t want anyone to miss it in the wake of SuperBowl Sunday. Nice work as usual, esmith. (I’ll unstick it in a couple days.)
Perhaps people might find it instructive to look at this in combination with the November Case Shiller numbers to get an idea of where the “official” numbers may be headed: http://piggington.com/november_case_shiller_hpi_gets_spanked
For the most part it looks like a continuation of the trend, though a couple mid-level areas stabilized in esmith’s data.
Also interesting that the supposedly invulnerable “coast” region has been on a pretty steady decline of late. That’s the last bastion for the bulls.
If anyone wants to see a bigger version click the image then click “original.”
Rich
February 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM #147786Rich ToscanoKeymasterI’m making this “sticky” at the top of the housing market forum topics list because it’s so awesome and I don’t want anyone to miss it in the wake of SuperBowl Sunday. Nice work as usual, esmith. (I’ll unstick it in a couple days.)
Perhaps people might find it instructive to look at this in combination with the November Case Shiller numbers to get an idea of where the “official” numbers may be headed: http://piggington.com/november_case_shiller_hpi_gets_spanked
For the most part it looks like a continuation of the trend, though a couple mid-level areas stabilized in esmith’s data.
Also interesting that the supposedly invulnerable “coast” region has been on a pretty steady decline of late. That’s the last bastion for the bulls.
If anyone wants to see a bigger version click the image then click “original.”
Rich
February 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM #147854Rich ToscanoKeymasterI’m making this “sticky” at the top of the housing market forum topics list because it’s so awesome and I don’t want anyone to miss it in the wake of SuperBowl Sunday. Nice work as usual, esmith. (I’ll unstick it in a couple days.)
Perhaps people might find it instructive to look at this in combination with the November Case Shiller numbers to get an idea of where the “official” numbers may be headed: http://piggington.com/november_case_shiller_hpi_gets_spanked
For the most part it looks like a continuation of the trend, though a couple mid-level areas stabilized in esmith’s data.
Also interesting that the supposedly invulnerable “coast” region has been on a pretty steady decline of late. That’s the last bastion for the bulls.
If anyone wants to see a bigger version click the image then click “original.”
Rich
February 4, 2008 at 4:02 AM #147558EugeneParticipantTweaked my regions a little bit: split 92127 into “old” Rancho Bernardo and “new” 4S/Del Sur/Santaluz. Dropped Poway (very eclectic city with houses from $400k to $5 million and no obvious way to divide it).
[img_assist|nid=6400|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=281]
Same thing but showing appreciation vs. 7/2000:
[img_assist|nid=6401|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=280]
Now taking mortgage interest rates into account. (in a rather ad hoc way) Again 100% corresponds to 7/2000.
[img_assist|nid=6402|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=316]
February 4, 2008 at 4:02 AM #147909EugeneParticipantTweaked my regions a little bit: split 92127 into “old” Rancho Bernardo and “new” 4S/Del Sur/Santaluz. Dropped Poway (very eclectic city with houses from $400k to $5 million and no obvious way to divide it).
[img_assist|nid=6400|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=281]
Same thing but showing appreciation vs. 7/2000:
[img_assist|nid=6401|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=280]
Now taking mortgage interest rates into account. (in a rather ad hoc way) Again 100% corresponds to 7/2000.
[img_assist|nid=6402|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=316]
February 4, 2008 at 4:02 AM #147807EugeneParticipantTweaked my regions a little bit: split 92127 into “old” Rancho Bernardo and “new” 4S/Del Sur/Santaluz. Dropped Poway (very eclectic city with houses from $400k to $5 million and no obvious way to divide it).
[img_assist|nid=6400|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=281]
Same thing but showing appreciation vs. 7/2000:
[img_assist|nid=6401|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=280]
Now taking mortgage interest rates into account. (in a rather ad hoc way) Again 100% corresponds to 7/2000.
[img_assist|nid=6402|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=316]
February 4, 2008 at 4:02 AM #147831EugeneParticipantTweaked my regions a little bit: split 92127 into “old” Rancho Bernardo and “new” 4S/Del Sur/Santaluz. Dropped Poway (very eclectic city with houses from $400k to $5 million and no obvious way to divide it).
[img_assist|nid=6400|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=281]
Same thing but showing appreciation vs. 7/2000:
[img_assist|nid=6401|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=280]
Now taking mortgage interest rates into account. (in a rather ad hoc way) Again 100% corresponds to 7/2000.
[img_assist|nid=6402|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=316]
February 4, 2008 at 4:02 AM #147842EugeneParticipantTweaked my regions a little bit: split 92127 into “old” Rancho Bernardo and “new” 4S/Del Sur/Santaluz. Dropped Poway (very eclectic city with houses from $400k to $5 million and no obvious way to divide it).
[img_assist|nid=6400|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=281]
Same thing but showing appreciation vs. 7/2000:
[img_assist|nid=6401|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=280]
Now taking mortgage interest rates into account. (in a rather ad hoc way) Again 100% corresponds to 7/2000.
[img_assist|nid=6402|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=316]
February 4, 2008 at 12:16 PM #147990sdrealtorParticipantLove the update.
February 4, 2008 at 12:16 PM #148069sdrealtorParticipantLove the update.
February 4, 2008 at 12:16 PM #148002sdrealtorParticipantLove the update.
February 4, 2008 at 12:16 PM #147968sdrealtorParticipantLove the update.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.