Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Impact of Proposed high speed rail
- This topic has 165 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by EconProf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 23, 2011 at 11:23 PM #658454January 25, 2011 at 5:24 PM #658068briansd1Guest
About high-speed train (as opposed to light rail) it’s an alternative to short plane rides (which are long if you add in the waiting and communiting time), and long car drives.
Anybody who’s been to Europe or Japan knows how nice it it so travel easily from city center to city center without the waits.
If we won’t spend money on high speed rail, we ought to upgrade our airports. When comparing the premier airports of the world, we can clearly see that America is falling behind.
We used to have the greatest train stations and the greatest aiports. But no longer.
January 25, 2011 at 5:24 PM #658131briansd1GuestAbout high-speed train (as opposed to light rail) it’s an alternative to short plane rides (which are long if you add in the waiting and communiting time), and long car drives.
Anybody who’s been to Europe or Japan knows how nice it it so travel easily from city center to city center without the waits.
If we won’t spend money on high speed rail, we ought to upgrade our airports. When comparing the premier airports of the world, we can clearly see that America is falling behind.
We used to have the greatest train stations and the greatest aiports. But no longer.
January 25, 2011 at 5:24 PM #658732briansd1GuestAbout high-speed train (as opposed to light rail) it’s an alternative to short plane rides (which are long if you add in the waiting and communiting time), and long car drives.
Anybody who’s been to Europe or Japan knows how nice it it so travel easily from city center to city center without the waits.
If we won’t spend money on high speed rail, we ought to upgrade our airports. When comparing the premier airports of the world, we can clearly see that America is falling behind.
We used to have the greatest train stations and the greatest aiports. But no longer.
January 25, 2011 at 5:24 PM #658871briansd1GuestAbout high-speed train (as opposed to light rail) it’s an alternative to short plane rides (which are long if you add in the waiting and communiting time), and long car drives.
Anybody who’s been to Europe or Japan knows how nice it it so travel easily from city center to city center without the waits.
If we won’t spend money on high speed rail, we ought to upgrade our airports. When comparing the premier airports of the world, we can clearly see that America is falling behind.
We used to have the greatest train stations and the greatest aiports. But no longer.
January 25, 2011 at 5:24 PM #659199briansd1GuestAbout high-speed train (as opposed to light rail) it’s an alternative to short plane rides (which are long if you add in the waiting and communiting time), and long car drives.
Anybody who’s been to Europe or Japan knows how nice it it so travel easily from city center to city center without the waits.
If we won’t spend money on high speed rail, we ought to upgrade our airports. When comparing the premier airports of the world, we can clearly see that America is falling behind.
We used to have the greatest train stations and the greatest aiports. But no longer.
June 22, 2011 at 1:29 PM #705342briansd1GuestInteresting article about high-speed trains in China.
Wow… what a difference a few years make.
I remember visiting China when the trains were so packed that passengers had to sit on the floor of the train cars.
I remember riding slow, dusty trains in China without air conditioning.
For the United States and Europe, the implications go beyond marveling at the pace of Communist-style civil engineering. As trains traveling 320 kilometers per hour link cities and provinces that were previously as much as 24 hours by road or rail from the entrepreneurial seacoast, China’s manufacturing might and global-export machine are likely to grow more powerful.
June 22, 2011 at 1:29 PM #705438briansd1GuestInteresting article about high-speed trains in China.
Wow… what a difference a few years make.
I remember visiting China when the trains were so packed that passengers had to sit on the floor of the train cars.
I remember riding slow, dusty trains in China without air conditioning.
For the United States and Europe, the implications go beyond marveling at the pace of Communist-style civil engineering. As trains traveling 320 kilometers per hour link cities and provinces that were previously as much as 24 hours by road or rail from the entrepreneurial seacoast, China’s manufacturing might and global-export machine are likely to grow more powerful.
June 22, 2011 at 1:29 PM #706034briansd1GuestInteresting article about high-speed trains in China.
Wow… what a difference a few years make.
I remember visiting China when the trains were so packed that passengers had to sit on the floor of the train cars.
I remember riding slow, dusty trains in China without air conditioning.
For the United States and Europe, the implications go beyond marveling at the pace of Communist-style civil engineering. As trains traveling 320 kilometers per hour link cities and provinces that were previously as much as 24 hours by road or rail from the entrepreneurial seacoast, China’s manufacturing might and global-export machine are likely to grow more powerful.
June 22, 2011 at 1:29 PM #706187briansd1GuestInteresting article about high-speed trains in China.
Wow… what a difference a few years make.
I remember visiting China when the trains were so packed that passengers had to sit on the floor of the train cars.
I remember riding slow, dusty trains in China without air conditioning.
For the United States and Europe, the implications go beyond marveling at the pace of Communist-style civil engineering. As trains traveling 320 kilometers per hour link cities and provinces that were previously as much as 24 hours by road or rail from the entrepreneurial seacoast, China’s manufacturing might and global-export machine are likely to grow more powerful.
June 22, 2011 at 1:29 PM #706549briansd1GuestInteresting article about high-speed trains in China.
Wow… what a difference a few years make.
I remember visiting China when the trains were so packed that passengers had to sit on the floor of the train cars.
I remember riding slow, dusty trains in China without air conditioning.
For the United States and Europe, the implications go beyond marveling at the pace of Communist-style civil engineering. As trains traveling 320 kilometers per hour link cities and provinces that were previously as much as 24 hours by road or rail from the entrepreneurial seacoast, China’s manufacturing might and global-export machine are likely to grow more powerful.
June 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM #705352sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=EconProf]Americans tend to want mass transit so other people get off the freeway and let them speed along in thier own car.[/quote]
Well said.
June 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM #705448sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=EconProf]Americans tend to want mass transit so other people get off the freeway and let them speed along in thier own car.[/quote]
Well said.
June 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM #706043sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=EconProf]Americans tend to want mass transit so other people get off the freeway and let them speed along in thier own car.[/quote]
Well said.
June 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM #706197sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=EconProf]Americans tend to want mass transit so other people get off the freeway and let them speed along in thier own car.[/quote]
Well said.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.