- This topic has 145 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by temeculaguy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 2, 2009 at 12:41 PM #16289September 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM #451943sdduuuudeParticipant
It isn’t as bad as some alternatives, such as weeds with foxtails in them.
I have ice plant on my back slope and have no rat issues and I’m on a canyon. Perhaps my dogs and the local coyotes keep the critters out.
The only really nice way is to terrace the whole slope, which can get very expensive quickly. You can build a 3′ retaining wall without a permit, so just build a series of 3′ walls with nice flat land between them.
Some materials say you can use a gravel footing instead of concrete. For terracing a large slope, though, I would recommend using a concrete footing anyway. I had one wall on a gravel footing list, and I know a friend who’s wall also went bad on him.
In San Diego, be careful of land that has been declared “environmentally sensitive.” You can’t build structures on that. If you do have “environmentally sensitive” land and it is on a slope that has been cut or filled, you can pull old grading permits, show the city that it is a “manmade” slope and they will lift the sensitive rating.
In Clairemont, a very popular method for building retaining walls is to stack chunks of concrete (from old slabs that have been removed). It isn’t beautiful, but if you make all of the walls with the same method, it has some charm to it in a Clairemont sort of way.
September 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM #452138sdduuuudeParticipantIt isn’t as bad as some alternatives, such as weeds with foxtails in them.
I have ice plant on my back slope and have no rat issues and I’m on a canyon. Perhaps my dogs and the local coyotes keep the critters out.
The only really nice way is to terrace the whole slope, which can get very expensive quickly. You can build a 3′ retaining wall without a permit, so just build a series of 3′ walls with nice flat land between them.
Some materials say you can use a gravel footing instead of concrete. For terracing a large slope, though, I would recommend using a concrete footing anyway. I had one wall on a gravel footing list, and I know a friend who’s wall also went bad on him.
In San Diego, be careful of land that has been declared “environmentally sensitive.” You can’t build structures on that. If you do have “environmentally sensitive” land and it is on a slope that has been cut or filled, you can pull old grading permits, show the city that it is a “manmade” slope and they will lift the sensitive rating.
In Clairemont, a very popular method for building retaining walls is to stack chunks of concrete (from old slabs that have been removed). It isn’t beautiful, but if you make all of the walls with the same method, it has some charm to it in a Clairemont sort of way.
September 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM #452479sdduuuudeParticipantIt isn’t as bad as some alternatives, such as weeds with foxtails in them.
I have ice plant on my back slope and have no rat issues and I’m on a canyon. Perhaps my dogs and the local coyotes keep the critters out.
The only really nice way is to terrace the whole slope, which can get very expensive quickly. You can build a 3′ retaining wall without a permit, so just build a series of 3′ walls with nice flat land between them.
Some materials say you can use a gravel footing instead of concrete. For terracing a large slope, though, I would recommend using a concrete footing anyway. I had one wall on a gravel footing list, and I know a friend who’s wall also went bad on him.
In San Diego, be careful of land that has been declared “environmentally sensitive.” You can’t build structures on that. If you do have “environmentally sensitive” land and it is on a slope that has been cut or filled, you can pull old grading permits, show the city that it is a “manmade” slope and they will lift the sensitive rating.
In Clairemont, a very popular method for building retaining walls is to stack chunks of concrete (from old slabs that have been removed). It isn’t beautiful, but if you make all of the walls with the same method, it has some charm to it in a Clairemont sort of way.
September 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM #452552sdduuuudeParticipantIt isn’t as bad as some alternatives, such as weeds with foxtails in them.
I have ice plant on my back slope and have no rat issues and I’m on a canyon. Perhaps my dogs and the local coyotes keep the critters out.
The only really nice way is to terrace the whole slope, which can get very expensive quickly. You can build a 3′ retaining wall without a permit, so just build a series of 3′ walls with nice flat land between them.
Some materials say you can use a gravel footing instead of concrete. For terracing a large slope, though, I would recommend using a concrete footing anyway. I had one wall on a gravel footing list, and I know a friend who’s wall also went bad on him.
In San Diego, be careful of land that has been declared “environmentally sensitive.” You can’t build structures on that. If you do have “environmentally sensitive” land and it is on a slope that has been cut or filled, you can pull old grading permits, show the city that it is a “manmade” slope and they will lift the sensitive rating.
In Clairemont, a very popular method for building retaining walls is to stack chunks of concrete (from old slabs that have been removed). It isn’t beautiful, but if you make all of the walls with the same method, it has some charm to it in a Clairemont sort of way.
September 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM #452740sdduuuudeParticipantIt isn’t as bad as some alternatives, such as weeds with foxtails in them.
I have ice plant on my back slope and have no rat issues and I’m on a canyon. Perhaps my dogs and the local coyotes keep the critters out.
The only really nice way is to terrace the whole slope, which can get very expensive quickly. You can build a 3′ retaining wall without a permit, so just build a series of 3′ walls with nice flat land between them.
Some materials say you can use a gravel footing instead of concrete. For terracing a large slope, though, I would recommend using a concrete footing anyway. I had one wall on a gravel footing list, and I know a friend who’s wall also went bad on him.
In San Diego, be careful of land that has been declared “environmentally sensitive.” You can’t build structures on that. If you do have “environmentally sensitive” land and it is on a slope that has been cut or filled, you can pull old grading permits, show the city that it is a “manmade” slope and they will lift the sensitive rating.
In Clairemont, a very popular method for building retaining walls is to stack chunks of concrete (from old slabs that have been removed). It isn’t beautiful, but if you make all of the walls with the same method, it has some charm to it in a Clairemont sort of way.
September 2, 2009 at 1:10 PM #451933SHILOHParticipantSouthern CA is basically desert. I am on the polar opposite of your view. Are you from Southern CA? Ice plant is great landscaping, prevents erosion, tolerates low water conditions – which is why it’s used for landscaping, as I understand it. Since the State of CA is essentially broke, more of these
low water type plants – like ice plant – should be utilized for landscaping.There is a project at Cuyamaca College that educates on various grass types and plants for Southern CA landscaping w/ lowest possible water use. I have visited it and it’s very educational:
http://www.thegarden.org/Be kind to the bees – we need all the pollinaters we can get.
September 2, 2009 at 1:10 PM #452128SHILOHParticipantSouthern CA is basically desert. I am on the polar opposite of your view. Are you from Southern CA? Ice plant is great landscaping, prevents erosion, tolerates low water conditions – which is why it’s used for landscaping, as I understand it. Since the State of CA is essentially broke, more of these
low water type plants – like ice plant – should be utilized for landscaping.There is a project at Cuyamaca College that educates on various grass types and plants for Southern CA landscaping w/ lowest possible water use. I have visited it and it’s very educational:
http://www.thegarden.org/Be kind to the bees – we need all the pollinaters we can get.
September 2, 2009 at 1:10 PM #452469SHILOHParticipantSouthern CA is basically desert. I am on the polar opposite of your view. Are you from Southern CA? Ice plant is great landscaping, prevents erosion, tolerates low water conditions – which is why it’s used for landscaping, as I understand it. Since the State of CA is essentially broke, more of these
low water type plants – like ice plant – should be utilized for landscaping.There is a project at Cuyamaca College that educates on various grass types and plants for Southern CA landscaping w/ lowest possible water use. I have visited it and it’s very educational:
http://www.thegarden.org/Be kind to the bees – we need all the pollinaters we can get.
September 2, 2009 at 1:10 PM #452541SHILOHParticipantSouthern CA is basically desert. I am on the polar opposite of your view. Are you from Southern CA? Ice plant is great landscaping, prevents erosion, tolerates low water conditions – which is why it’s used for landscaping, as I understand it. Since the State of CA is essentially broke, more of these
low water type plants – like ice plant – should be utilized for landscaping.There is a project at Cuyamaca College that educates on various grass types and plants for Southern CA landscaping w/ lowest possible water use. I have visited it and it’s very educational:
http://www.thegarden.org/Be kind to the bees – we need all the pollinaters we can get.
September 2, 2009 at 1:10 PM #452731SHILOHParticipantSouthern CA is basically desert. I am on the polar opposite of your view. Are you from Southern CA? Ice plant is great landscaping, prevents erosion, tolerates low water conditions – which is why it’s used for landscaping, as I understand it. Since the State of CA is essentially broke, more of these
low water type plants – like ice plant – should be utilized for landscaping.There is a project at Cuyamaca College that educates on various grass types and plants for Southern CA landscaping w/ lowest possible water use. I have visited it and it’s very educational:
http://www.thegarden.org/Be kind to the bees – we need all the pollinaters we can get.
September 2, 2009 at 1:11 PM #451953sdduuuudeParticipantYeah, Shiloh – it’s cheap and it works. Can’t say that about too many things.
September 2, 2009 at 1:11 PM #452149sdduuuudeParticipantYeah, Shiloh – it’s cheap and it works. Can’t say that about too many things.
September 2, 2009 at 1:11 PM #452488sdduuuudeParticipantYeah, Shiloh – it’s cheap and it works. Can’t say that about too many things.
September 2, 2009 at 1:11 PM #452562sdduuuudeParticipantYeah, Shiloh – it’s cheap and it works. Can’t say that about too many things.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.