Menu

Home › Forums › Other › How do you see a Democratic prez handling the mortgage crash?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 51 total)
1 2 3 4
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 10, 2008 at 10:44 PM #11463
    admin
    Keymaster

    As most of you on here know, I’m a Democrat. However, I don’t want to see any more bailouts. If Hillary or Obama gets in there, do you think they will push to keep these irresponsible owners in their homes? Won’t that in turn delay the bottom? Or will there be more bailouts no matter what party gets in the white house? (dem vs. repub)

    I’ll vote democratic anyway, because there are other changes I want to see regardless of the housing market, but anyway, that’s my question.

    January 10, 2008 at 11:00 PM #133977
    Sandi Egan
    Participant

    I think if any candidate not well-versed in economy gets elected, he or she will heavily rely on advisers, particularly those who are running things now, like BB.
    That’s what happened to Clinton in 1992, when Greenspan and Rubin “explained” to him how things work.

    January 10, 2008 at 11:00 PM #134170
    Sandi Egan
    Participant

    I think if any candidate not well-versed in economy gets elected, he or she will heavily rely on advisers, particularly those who are running things now, like BB.
    That’s what happened to Clinton in 1992, when Greenspan and Rubin “explained” to him how things work.

    January 10, 2008 at 11:00 PM #134178
    Sandi Egan
    Participant

    I think if any candidate not well-versed in economy gets elected, he or she will heavily rely on advisers, particularly those who are running things now, like BB.
    That’s what happened to Clinton in 1992, when Greenspan and Rubin “explained” to him how things work.

    January 10, 2008 at 11:00 PM #134234
    Sandi Egan
    Participant

    I think if any candidate not well-versed in economy gets elected, he or she will heavily rely on advisers, particularly those who are running things now, like BB.
    That’s what happened to Clinton in 1992, when Greenspan and Rubin “explained” to him how things work.

    January 10, 2008 at 11:00 PM #134272
    Sandi Egan
    Participant

    I think if any candidate not well-versed in economy gets elected, he or she will heavily rely on advisers, particularly those who are running things now, like BB.
    That’s what happened to Clinton in 1992, when Greenspan and Rubin “explained” to him how things work.

    January 10, 2008 at 11:38 PM #134002
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    It doesn’t really matter who gets elected (with the exception of Ron Paul) because the taxpayers will end up paying in one way or another. If/when Hillary does win it then yes our tax burden will be maximized in my humble opinion.

    SD Realtor

    January 10, 2008 at 11:38 PM #134195
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    It doesn’t really matter who gets elected (with the exception of Ron Paul) because the taxpayers will end up paying in one way or another. If/when Hillary does win it then yes our tax burden will be maximized in my humble opinion.

    SD Realtor

    January 10, 2008 at 11:38 PM #134204
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    It doesn’t really matter who gets elected (with the exception of Ron Paul) because the taxpayers will end up paying in one way or another. If/when Hillary does win it then yes our tax burden will be maximized in my humble opinion.

    SD Realtor

    January 10, 2008 at 11:38 PM #134259
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    It doesn’t really matter who gets elected (with the exception of Ron Paul) because the taxpayers will end up paying in one way or another. If/when Hillary does win it then yes our tax burden will be maximized in my humble opinion.

    SD Realtor

    January 10, 2008 at 11:38 PM #134297
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    It doesn’t really matter who gets elected (with the exception of Ron Paul) because the taxpayers will end up paying in one way or another. If/when Hillary does win it then yes our tax burden will be maximized in my humble opinion.

    SD Realtor

    January 11, 2008 at 12:45 AM #134017
    Eugene
    Participant

    IMHO

    By November, falling consumer spending will eclipse mortgage problems

    Democrats will save the consumer by taxing the heck out of the top 20% and redistributing the money among the bottom 80% (tax cuts, expanded welfare projects, free healthcare, etc.)

    Republicans (except RP) will make Bush tax cuts permanent, top off with some free cash to everyone

    January 11, 2008 at 12:45 AM #134210
    Eugene
    Participant

    IMHO

    By November, falling consumer spending will eclipse mortgage problems

    Democrats will save the consumer by taxing the heck out of the top 20% and redistributing the money among the bottom 80% (tax cuts, expanded welfare projects, free healthcare, etc.)

    Republicans (except RP) will make Bush tax cuts permanent, top off with some free cash to everyone

    January 11, 2008 at 12:45 AM #134219
    Eugene
    Participant

    IMHO

    By November, falling consumer spending will eclipse mortgage problems

    Democrats will save the consumer by taxing the heck out of the top 20% and redistributing the money among the bottom 80% (tax cuts, expanded welfare projects, free healthcare, etc.)

    Republicans (except RP) will make Bush tax cuts permanent, top off with some free cash to everyone

    January 11, 2008 at 12:45 AM #134274
    Eugene
    Participant

    IMHO

    By November, falling consumer spending will eclipse mortgage problems

    Democrats will save the consumer by taxing the heck out of the top 20% and redistributing the money among the bottom 80% (tax cuts, expanded welfare projects, free healthcare, etc.)

    Republicans (except RP) will make Bush tax cuts permanent, top off with some free cash to everyone

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 51 total)
1 2 3 4
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.