- This topic has 520 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 8, 2009 at 9:20 AM #479847November 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM #479018fishsticksParticipant
[quote=sd_matt]What’s the middle ground between the WP survey and Becks? That is probably the most accurate thing we have since all sides are spun.[/quote]
Yes, clearly reality lies somewhere between ABC/Washington Post (professional news organizations who employ professional statisticians) and Glenn Beck (a race-baiting, hyper nationalist, man-child who, like Father Coughlin and other fascists during the 1930s, makes up convenient facts on the fly intended to stir his followers into a furor).
November 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM #479188fishsticksParticipant[quote=sd_matt]What’s the middle ground between the WP survey and Becks? That is probably the most accurate thing we have since all sides are spun.[/quote]
Yes, clearly reality lies somewhere between ABC/Washington Post (professional news organizations who employ professional statisticians) and Glenn Beck (a race-baiting, hyper nationalist, man-child who, like Father Coughlin and other fascists during the 1930s, makes up convenient facts on the fly intended to stir his followers into a furor).
November 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM #479554fishsticksParticipant[quote=sd_matt]What’s the middle ground between the WP survey and Becks? That is probably the most accurate thing we have since all sides are spun.[/quote]
Yes, clearly reality lies somewhere between ABC/Washington Post (professional news organizations who employ professional statisticians) and Glenn Beck (a race-baiting, hyper nationalist, man-child who, like Father Coughlin and other fascists during the 1930s, makes up convenient facts on the fly intended to stir his followers into a furor).
November 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM #479633fishsticksParticipant[quote=sd_matt]What’s the middle ground between the WP survey and Becks? That is probably the most accurate thing we have since all sides are spun.[/quote]
Yes, clearly reality lies somewhere between ABC/Washington Post (professional news organizations who employ professional statisticians) and Glenn Beck (a race-baiting, hyper nationalist, man-child who, like Father Coughlin and other fascists during the 1930s, makes up convenient facts on the fly intended to stir his followers into a furor).
November 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM #479856fishsticksParticipant[quote=sd_matt]What’s the middle ground between the WP survey and Becks? That is probably the most accurate thing we have since all sides are spun.[/quote]
Yes, clearly reality lies somewhere between ABC/Washington Post (professional news organizations who employ professional statisticians) and Glenn Beck (a race-baiting, hyper nationalist, man-child who, like Father Coughlin and other fascists during the 1930s, makes up convenient facts on the fly intended to stir his followers into a furor).
November 8, 2009 at 9:33 AM #479028jpinpbParticipantIf the premise is everyone is buying insurance hence premiums will be lower and the way to insure everyone is buying it is if you don’t, you will be fined, this theory already fails.
I don’t know what the dividing line is between poverty and relieved of the obligation of buying insurance and those who are required to purchase it, that can be a thin line. And more people could fall below it.
If everyone does NOT buy insurance, the premiums won’t be lower. The only guarantee that exists to make people buy insurance is to say if you don’t, you’ll be fined. I see a flaw here. There will be people who just won’t buy it. As I say, who is going to know if they did or not? Who is going to enforce it? And if you don’t pay, what happens?
There are so many glaringly misconceptions. In a perfect world, everyone would be covered.
November 8, 2009 at 9:33 AM #479198jpinpbParticipantIf the premise is everyone is buying insurance hence premiums will be lower and the way to insure everyone is buying it is if you don’t, you will be fined, this theory already fails.
I don’t know what the dividing line is between poverty and relieved of the obligation of buying insurance and those who are required to purchase it, that can be a thin line. And more people could fall below it.
If everyone does NOT buy insurance, the premiums won’t be lower. The only guarantee that exists to make people buy insurance is to say if you don’t, you’ll be fined. I see a flaw here. There will be people who just won’t buy it. As I say, who is going to know if they did or not? Who is going to enforce it? And if you don’t pay, what happens?
There are so many glaringly misconceptions. In a perfect world, everyone would be covered.
November 8, 2009 at 9:33 AM #479564jpinpbParticipantIf the premise is everyone is buying insurance hence premiums will be lower and the way to insure everyone is buying it is if you don’t, you will be fined, this theory already fails.
I don’t know what the dividing line is between poverty and relieved of the obligation of buying insurance and those who are required to purchase it, that can be a thin line. And more people could fall below it.
If everyone does NOT buy insurance, the premiums won’t be lower. The only guarantee that exists to make people buy insurance is to say if you don’t, you’ll be fined. I see a flaw here. There will be people who just won’t buy it. As I say, who is going to know if they did or not? Who is going to enforce it? And if you don’t pay, what happens?
There are so many glaringly misconceptions. In a perfect world, everyone would be covered.
November 8, 2009 at 9:33 AM #479643jpinpbParticipantIf the premise is everyone is buying insurance hence premiums will be lower and the way to insure everyone is buying it is if you don’t, you will be fined, this theory already fails.
I don’t know what the dividing line is between poverty and relieved of the obligation of buying insurance and those who are required to purchase it, that can be a thin line. And more people could fall below it.
If everyone does NOT buy insurance, the premiums won’t be lower. The only guarantee that exists to make people buy insurance is to say if you don’t, you’ll be fined. I see a flaw here. There will be people who just won’t buy it. As I say, who is going to know if they did or not? Who is going to enforce it? And if you don’t pay, what happens?
There are so many glaringly misconceptions. In a perfect world, everyone would be covered.
November 8, 2009 at 9:33 AM #479866jpinpbParticipantIf the premise is everyone is buying insurance hence premiums will be lower and the way to insure everyone is buying it is if you don’t, you will be fined, this theory already fails.
I don’t know what the dividing line is between poverty and relieved of the obligation of buying insurance and those who are required to purchase it, that can be a thin line. And more people could fall below it.
If everyone does NOT buy insurance, the premiums won’t be lower. The only guarantee that exists to make people buy insurance is to say if you don’t, you’ll be fined. I see a flaw here. There will be people who just won’t buy it. As I say, who is going to know if they did or not? Who is going to enforce it? And if you don’t pay, what happens?
There are so many glaringly misconceptions. In a perfect world, everyone would be covered.
November 8, 2009 at 9:43 AM #479023NeetaTParticipantForce me to buy health insurance or pay a fine? I will choose jail time instead. To force insurance companies to take on pre-existing conditions is like someone being forced to place a bet on the worst game in the casino. Great, let’s also destroy all the jobs related to the private health insurance industry. Even better yet, let’s penalize success by placing a surcharge on people who make 500k or more. Idiots!!!!!!!!
November 8, 2009 at 9:43 AM #479193NeetaTParticipantForce me to buy health insurance or pay a fine? I will choose jail time instead. To force insurance companies to take on pre-existing conditions is like someone being forced to place a bet on the worst game in the casino. Great, let’s also destroy all the jobs related to the private health insurance industry. Even better yet, let’s penalize success by placing a surcharge on people who make 500k or more. Idiots!!!!!!!!
November 8, 2009 at 9:43 AM #479559NeetaTParticipantForce me to buy health insurance or pay a fine? I will choose jail time instead. To force insurance companies to take on pre-existing conditions is like someone being forced to place a bet on the worst game in the casino. Great, let’s also destroy all the jobs related to the private health insurance industry. Even better yet, let’s penalize success by placing a surcharge on people who make 500k or more. Idiots!!!!!!!!
November 8, 2009 at 9:43 AM #479638NeetaTParticipantForce me to buy health insurance or pay a fine? I will choose jail time instead. To force insurance companies to take on pre-existing conditions is like someone being forced to place a bet on the worst game in the casino. Great, let’s also destroy all the jobs related to the private health insurance industry. Even better yet, let’s penalize success by placing a surcharge on people who make 500k or more. Idiots!!!!!!!!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.