- This topic has 1,015 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by KSMountain.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 23, 2009 at 2:51 PM #497686December 23, 2009 at 3:09 PM #496821DWCAPParticipant
I would argue that we must be required to fill out living will’s along with our required insurance paperwork. It should be kept onhand with the paperwork.
So often it isnt the people ‘charging’ the system who elect for these costs, but rather their families. My Grandfather made it abundantly clear he did NOT want to be on a machine. But when ‘God came calling’ my aunt wasnt ready for it. She did everything she could to try to convince my family to do everything medically possible. Most medical costs are in the last few months of life, and it is stupid we leave all decisions until this point. I really think this alone would fix 25%+ of the funding gap for health care. And how can we argue that personal choices are apart of ‘death panels’ or ‘socialist rationing’?
December 23, 2009 at 3:09 PM #496967DWCAPParticipantI would argue that we must be required to fill out living will’s along with our required insurance paperwork. It should be kept onhand with the paperwork.
So often it isnt the people ‘charging’ the system who elect for these costs, but rather their families. My Grandfather made it abundantly clear he did NOT want to be on a machine. But when ‘God came calling’ my aunt wasnt ready for it. She did everything she could to try to convince my family to do everything medically possible. Most medical costs are in the last few months of life, and it is stupid we leave all decisions until this point. I really think this alone would fix 25%+ of the funding gap for health care. And how can we argue that personal choices are apart of ‘death panels’ or ‘socialist rationing’?
December 23, 2009 at 3:09 PM #497354DWCAPParticipantI would argue that we must be required to fill out living will’s along with our required insurance paperwork. It should be kept onhand with the paperwork.
So often it isnt the people ‘charging’ the system who elect for these costs, but rather their families. My Grandfather made it abundantly clear he did NOT want to be on a machine. But when ‘God came calling’ my aunt wasnt ready for it. She did everything she could to try to convince my family to do everything medically possible. Most medical costs are in the last few months of life, and it is stupid we leave all decisions until this point. I really think this alone would fix 25%+ of the funding gap for health care. And how can we argue that personal choices are apart of ‘death panels’ or ‘socialist rationing’?
December 23, 2009 at 3:09 PM #497443DWCAPParticipantI would argue that we must be required to fill out living will’s along with our required insurance paperwork. It should be kept onhand with the paperwork.
So often it isnt the people ‘charging’ the system who elect for these costs, but rather their families. My Grandfather made it abundantly clear he did NOT want to be on a machine. But when ‘God came calling’ my aunt wasnt ready for it. She did everything she could to try to convince my family to do everything medically possible. Most medical costs are in the last few months of life, and it is stupid we leave all decisions until this point. I really think this alone would fix 25%+ of the funding gap for health care. And how can we argue that personal choices are apart of ‘death panels’ or ‘socialist rationing’?
December 23, 2009 at 3:09 PM #497691DWCAPParticipantI would argue that we must be required to fill out living will’s along with our required insurance paperwork. It should be kept onhand with the paperwork.
So often it isnt the people ‘charging’ the system who elect for these costs, but rather their families. My Grandfather made it abundantly clear he did NOT want to be on a machine. But when ‘God came calling’ my aunt wasnt ready for it. She did everything she could to try to convince my family to do everything medically possible. Most medical costs are in the last few months of life, and it is stupid we leave all decisions until this point. I really think this alone would fix 25%+ of the funding gap for health care. And how can we argue that personal choices are apart of ‘death panels’ or ‘socialist rationing’?
December 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM #496825Carl VeritasParticipantNeetaT,
At the beginning of the 20th century, 90 percent of hospitals were private, for-profit enterprises.
State and local governments began taking over the hospital industry that by early 1990s only 10 percent are.If not socialism, what should we call this,
the free market?December 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM #496972Carl VeritasParticipantNeetaT,
At the beginning of the 20th century, 90 percent of hospitals were private, for-profit enterprises.
State and local governments began taking over the hospital industry that by early 1990s only 10 percent are.If not socialism, what should we call this,
the free market?December 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM #497359Carl VeritasParticipantNeetaT,
At the beginning of the 20th century, 90 percent of hospitals were private, for-profit enterprises.
State and local governments began taking over the hospital industry that by early 1990s only 10 percent are.If not socialism, what should we call this,
the free market?December 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM #497448Carl VeritasParticipantNeetaT,
At the beginning of the 20th century, 90 percent of hospitals were private, for-profit enterprises.
State and local governments began taking over the hospital industry that by early 1990s only 10 percent are.If not socialism, what should we call this,
the free market?December 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM #497696Carl VeritasParticipantNeetaT,
At the beginning of the 20th century, 90 percent of hospitals were private, for-profit enterprises.
State and local governments began taking over the hospital industry that by early 1990s only 10 percent are.If not socialism, what should we call this,
the free market?December 23, 2009 at 5:00 PM #496840ArrayaParticipant[quote=Carl Veritas]NeetaT,
At the beginning of the 20th century, 90 percent of hospitals were private, for-profit enterprises.
State and local governments began taking over the hospital industry that by early 1990s only 10 percent are.If not socialism, what should we call this,
the free market?[/quote]Ahhh… The good old days, when you could stick 9 year olds in coal mines and get away with shooting factory workers for asking for living wages.
Nothing like those days.
Public hospitals comprise about 20% of total hospitals, it’s slightly higher than the number for-profit hospitals. Non-profit make up the biggest percentage which about 65% of total hospitals, which is a much different entity than public.
I believe most public are inner city. I’m not too sure many of the poor downtrodden hospital chain owners are to sad about losing that market share to the big bad government.
And no, they did not take over the industry, the provided more hospitals.
Hospitals were probably a luxury for a very small percentage of the population in 1900.
December 23, 2009 at 5:00 PM #496987ArrayaParticipant[quote=Carl Veritas]NeetaT,
At the beginning of the 20th century, 90 percent of hospitals were private, for-profit enterprises.
State and local governments began taking over the hospital industry that by early 1990s only 10 percent are.If not socialism, what should we call this,
the free market?[/quote]Ahhh… The good old days, when you could stick 9 year olds in coal mines and get away with shooting factory workers for asking for living wages.
Nothing like those days.
Public hospitals comprise about 20% of total hospitals, it’s slightly higher than the number for-profit hospitals. Non-profit make up the biggest percentage which about 65% of total hospitals, which is a much different entity than public.
I believe most public are inner city. I’m not too sure many of the poor downtrodden hospital chain owners are to sad about losing that market share to the big bad government.
And no, they did not take over the industry, the provided more hospitals.
Hospitals were probably a luxury for a very small percentage of the population in 1900.
December 23, 2009 at 5:00 PM #497374ArrayaParticipant[quote=Carl Veritas]NeetaT,
At the beginning of the 20th century, 90 percent of hospitals were private, for-profit enterprises.
State and local governments began taking over the hospital industry that by early 1990s only 10 percent are.If not socialism, what should we call this,
the free market?[/quote]Ahhh… The good old days, when you could stick 9 year olds in coal mines and get away with shooting factory workers for asking for living wages.
Nothing like those days.
Public hospitals comprise about 20% of total hospitals, it’s slightly higher than the number for-profit hospitals. Non-profit make up the biggest percentage which about 65% of total hospitals, which is a much different entity than public.
I believe most public are inner city. I’m not too sure many of the poor downtrodden hospital chain owners are to sad about losing that market share to the big bad government.
And no, they did not take over the industry, the provided more hospitals.
Hospitals were probably a luxury for a very small percentage of the population in 1900.
December 23, 2009 at 5:00 PM #497463ArrayaParticipant[quote=Carl Veritas]NeetaT,
At the beginning of the 20th century, 90 percent of hospitals were private, for-profit enterprises.
State and local governments began taking over the hospital industry that by early 1990s only 10 percent are.If not socialism, what should we call this,
the free market?[/quote]Ahhh… The good old days, when you could stick 9 year olds in coal mines and get away with shooting factory workers for asking for living wages.
Nothing like those days.
Public hospitals comprise about 20% of total hospitals, it’s slightly higher than the number for-profit hospitals. Non-profit make up the biggest percentage which about 65% of total hospitals, which is a much different entity than public.
I believe most public are inner city. I’m not too sure many of the poor downtrodden hospital chain owners are to sad about losing that market share to the big bad government.
And no, they did not take over the industry, the provided more hospitals.
Hospitals were probably a luxury for a very small percentage of the population in 1900.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.