- This topic has 365 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 24, 2010 at 5:30 PM #531612March 24, 2010 at 5:39 PM #530681danielwisParticipant
[quote=SK in CV][quote=Aecetia]Everyone should go in to any health care they want to and demand free care. After all it is an entitlement. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Just put it on the Fed. tab. Why should anyone pay? Actually it has been happening. People are asking for free tests because it’s like Christmas now. Santobama just gave them everything the need. Isn’t this just peachy? From the insolvent Post Office, to foundering social security and medicare. Houston do we have a problem? Calling Brian to explain why this is a good thing again….[/quote]
What does any of this have to do with the HCR bill that was passed?
1. Everyone doesn’t get free health care. Some do. If your income is over roughly $88,000 for a family of 4, you pay 100% of the costs yourself. Under that amount, you get some sudsidies, down to roughly $28,000 of income. Under that, you qualify for medicaid.
2. Whats good for the goose….Non-applicable. Makes no sense.
3. According to the CBO, it will reduce the deficit over the next 10 years. It’s not adding to any tab.
4. People ask for free stuff all the time. Sometimes they get it. If you’re at or close to the poverty level, you might. Otherwise you won’t.
5. I suspect no amount of explaining will help you understand. You can’t understand what you don’t want to understand.[/quote]
Good post. The arguments against HCR are getting dumber and dumber.
March 24, 2010 at 5:39 PM #530809danielwisParticipant[quote=SK in CV][quote=Aecetia]Everyone should go in to any health care they want to and demand free care. After all it is an entitlement. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Just put it on the Fed. tab. Why should anyone pay? Actually it has been happening. People are asking for free tests because it’s like Christmas now. Santobama just gave them everything the need. Isn’t this just peachy? From the insolvent Post Office, to foundering social security and medicare. Houston do we have a problem? Calling Brian to explain why this is a good thing again….[/quote]
What does any of this have to do with the HCR bill that was passed?
1. Everyone doesn’t get free health care. Some do. If your income is over roughly $88,000 for a family of 4, you pay 100% of the costs yourself. Under that amount, you get some sudsidies, down to roughly $28,000 of income. Under that, you qualify for medicaid.
2. Whats good for the goose….Non-applicable. Makes no sense.
3. According to the CBO, it will reduce the deficit over the next 10 years. It’s not adding to any tab.
4. People ask for free stuff all the time. Sometimes they get it. If you’re at or close to the poverty level, you might. Otherwise you won’t.
5. I suspect no amount of explaining will help you understand. You can’t understand what you don’t want to understand.[/quote]
Good post. The arguments against HCR are getting dumber and dumber.
March 24, 2010 at 5:39 PM #531261danielwisParticipant[quote=SK in CV][quote=Aecetia]Everyone should go in to any health care they want to and demand free care. After all it is an entitlement. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Just put it on the Fed. tab. Why should anyone pay? Actually it has been happening. People are asking for free tests because it’s like Christmas now. Santobama just gave them everything the need. Isn’t this just peachy? From the insolvent Post Office, to foundering social security and medicare. Houston do we have a problem? Calling Brian to explain why this is a good thing again….[/quote]
What does any of this have to do with the HCR bill that was passed?
1. Everyone doesn’t get free health care. Some do. If your income is over roughly $88,000 for a family of 4, you pay 100% of the costs yourself. Under that amount, you get some sudsidies, down to roughly $28,000 of income. Under that, you qualify for medicaid.
2. Whats good for the goose….Non-applicable. Makes no sense.
3. According to the CBO, it will reduce the deficit over the next 10 years. It’s not adding to any tab.
4. People ask for free stuff all the time. Sometimes they get it. If you’re at or close to the poverty level, you might. Otherwise you won’t.
5. I suspect no amount of explaining will help you understand. You can’t understand what you don’t want to understand.[/quote]
Good post. The arguments against HCR are getting dumber and dumber.
March 24, 2010 at 5:39 PM #531358danielwisParticipant[quote=SK in CV][quote=Aecetia]Everyone should go in to any health care they want to and demand free care. After all it is an entitlement. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Just put it on the Fed. tab. Why should anyone pay? Actually it has been happening. People are asking for free tests because it’s like Christmas now. Santobama just gave them everything the need. Isn’t this just peachy? From the insolvent Post Office, to foundering social security and medicare. Houston do we have a problem? Calling Brian to explain why this is a good thing again….[/quote]
What does any of this have to do with the HCR bill that was passed?
1. Everyone doesn’t get free health care. Some do. If your income is over roughly $88,000 for a family of 4, you pay 100% of the costs yourself. Under that amount, you get some sudsidies, down to roughly $28,000 of income. Under that, you qualify for medicaid.
2. Whats good for the goose….Non-applicable. Makes no sense.
3. According to the CBO, it will reduce the deficit over the next 10 years. It’s not adding to any tab.
4. People ask for free stuff all the time. Sometimes they get it. If you’re at or close to the poverty level, you might. Otherwise you won’t.
5. I suspect no amount of explaining will help you understand. You can’t understand what you don’t want to understand.[/quote]
Good post. The arguments against HCR are getting dumber and dumber.
March 24, 2010 at 5:39 PM #531617danielwisParticipant[quote=SK in CV][quote=Aecetia]Everyone should go in to any health care they want to and demand free care. After all it is an entitlement. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Just put it on the Fed. tab. Why should anyone pay? Actually it has been happening. People are asking for free tests because it’s like Christmas now. Santobama just gave them everything the need. Isn’t this just peachy? From the insolvent Post Office, to foundering social security and medicare. Houston do we have a problem? Calling Brian to explain why this is a good thing again….[/quote]
What does any of this have to do with the HCR bill that was passed?
1. Everyone doesn’t get free health care. Some do. If your income is over roughly $88,000 for a family of 4, you pay 100% of the costs yourself. Under that amount, you get some sudsidies, down to roughly $28,000 of income. Under that, you qualify for medicaid.
2. Whats good for the goose….Non-applicable. Makes no sense.
3. According to the CBO, it will reduce the deficit over the next 10 years. It’s not adding to any tab.
4. People ask for free stuff all the time. Sometimes they get it. If you’re at or close to the poverty level, you might. Otherwise you won’t.
5. I suspect no amount of explaining will help you understand. You can’t understand what you don’t want to understand.[/quote]
Good post. The arguments against HCR are getting dumber and dumber.
March 24, 2010 at 7:16 PM #530696gandalfParticipantOn the pharma subsidies, if the right-wing hadn’t been so opposed to anything connected to Obama, unwilling to negotiate for middle-ground, then the administration wouldn’t have had to go hat in hand to big pharma asking them what would it take to support the bill. Hence the giveaways, so Pharma would support health care reform.
Ironic, isn’t it? David Frum made this point. By taking a hard line, the GOP just isolated themselves further, and the outcome is worse for their supporters than if they had engaged in the outcome. Pretty foolish.
March 24, 2010 at 7:16 PM #530824gandalfParticipantOn the pharma subsidies, if the right-wing hadn’t been so opposed to anything connected to Obama, unwilling to negotiate for middle-ground, then the administration wouldn’t have had to go hat in hand to big pharma asking them what would it take to support the bill. Hence the giveaways, so Pharma would support health care reform.
Ironic, isn’t it? David Frum made this point. By taking a hard line, the GOP just isolated themselves further, and the outcome is worse for their supporters than if they had engaged in the outcome. Pretty foolish.
March 24, 2010 at 7:16 PM #531275gandalfParticipantOn the pharma subsidies, if the right-wing hadn’t been so opposed to anything connected to Obama, unwilling to negotiate for middle-ground, then the administration wouldn’t have had to go hat in hand to big pharma asking them what would it take to support the bill. Hence the giveaways, so Pharma would support health care reform.
Ironic, isn’t it? David Frum made this point. By taking a hard line, the GOP just isolated themselves further, and the outcome is worse for their supporters than if they had engaged in the outcome. Pretty foolish.
March 24, 2010 at 7:16 PM #531373gandalfParticipantOn the pharma subsidies, if the right-wing hadn’t been so opposed to anything connected to Obama, unwilling to negotiate for middle-ground, then the administration wouldn’t have had to go hat in hand to big pharma asking them what would it take to support the bill. Hence the giveaways, so Pharma would support health care reform.
Ironic, isn’t it? David Frum made this point. By taking a hard line, the GOP just isolated themselves further, and the outcome is worse for their supporters than if they had engaged in the outcome. Pretty foolish.
March 24, 2010 at 7:16 PM #531632gandalfParticipantOn the pharma subsidies, if the right-wing hadn’t been so opposed to anything connected to Obama, unwilling to negotiate for middle-ground, then the administration wouldn’t have had to go hat in hand to big pharma asking them what would it take to support the bill. Hence the giveaways, so Pharma would support health care reform.
Ironic, isn’t it? David Frum made this point. By taking a hard line, the GOP just isolated themselves further, and the outcome is worse for their supporters than if they had engaged in the outcome. Pretty foolish.
March 24, 2010 at 8:04 PM #530706NeetaTParticipantMy hope is that the state lawsuits will prevail. Please do not get too upset just yet. There is still hope out there. If the GOP can take back control and we elect a responsible president in 2012, we may have a chance of reversing the damage. Life is short, do not let this feckless leadership get you down, it is what they want. The current administration is laughing in our faces, but the strong will preserver by not rolling over in the fetal position. Take a deep breath and relax. As Dale Carnage once said, “99% of the things he worried about never happened.” That was a paraphrase by the way.
March 24, 2010 at 8:04 PM #530834NeetaTParticipantMy hope is that the state lawsuits will prevail. Please do not get too upset just yet. There is still hope out there. If the GOP can take back control and we elect a responsible president in 2012, we may have a chance of reversing the damage. Life is short, do not let this feckless leadership get you down, it is what they want. The current administration is laughing in our faces, but the strong will preserver by not rolling over in the fetal position. Take a deep breath and relax. As Dale Carnage once said, “99% of the things he worried about never happened.” That was a paraphrase by the way.
March 24, 2010 at 8:04 PM #531285NeetaTParticipantMy hope is that the state lawsuits will prevail. Please do not get too upset just yet. There is still hope out there. If the GOP can take back control and we elect a responsible president in 2012, we may have a chance of reversing the damage. Life is short, do not let this feckless leadership get you down, it is what they want. The current administration is laughing in our faces, but the strong will preserver by not rolling over in the fetal position. Take a deep breath and relax. As Dale Carnage once said, “99% of the things he worried about never happened.” That was a paraphrase by the way.
March 24, 2010 at 8:04 PM #531383NeetaTParticipantMy hope is that the state lawsuits will prevail. Please do not get too upset just yet. There is still hope out there. If the GOP can take back control and we elect a responsible president in 2012, we may have a chance of reversing the damage. Life is short, do not let this feckless leadership get you down, it is what they want. The current administration is laughing in our faces, but the strong will preserver by not rolling over in the fetal position. Take a deep breath and relax. As Dale Carnage once said, “99% of the things he worried about never happened.” That was a paraphrase by the way.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.