- This topic has 840 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by justme.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 17, 2009 at 5:09 AM #446227August 17, 2009 at 6:02 AM #445448blahblahblahParticipant
It is amazing how unreal the thinking is still
It is the whole woman’s life. I don’t have much sympathy either, but just imagine a lifestyle change that means you need to move out of your house, your neighborhood, leave all of your friends, move your kids to a poorer area, etc… because of a divorce. Happens all the time and it’s tough. This woman has just not faced reality yet, but she will have to at some point.
August 17, 2009 at 6:02 AM #445642blahblahblahParticipantIt is amazing how unreal the thinking is still
It is the whole woman’s life. I don’t have much sympathy either, but just imagine a lifestyle change that means you need to move out of your house, your neighborhood, leave all of your friends, move your kids to a poorer area, etc… because of a divorce. Happens all the time and it’s tough. This woman has just not faced reality yet, but she will have to at some point.
August 17, 2009 at 6:02 AM #445980blahblahblahParticipantIt is amazing how unreal the thinking is still
It is the whole woman’s life. I don’t have much sympathy either, but just imagine a lifestyle change that means you need to move out of your house, your neighborhood, leave all of your friends, move your kids to a poorer area, etc… because of a divorce. Happens all the time and it’s tough. This woman has just not faced reality yet, but she will have to at some point.
August 17, 2009 at 6:02 AM #446051blahblahblahParticipantIt is amazing how unreal the thinking is still
It is the whole woman’s life. I don’t have much sympathy either, but just imagine a lifestyle change that means you need to move out of your house, your neighborhood, leave all of your friends, move your kids to a poorer area, etc… because of a divorce. Happens all the time and it’s tough. This woman has just not faced reality yet, but she will have to at some point.
August 17, 2009 at 6:02 AM #446232blahblahblahParticipantIt is amazing how unreal the thinking is still
It is the whole woman’s life. I don’t have much sympathy either, but just imagine a lifestyle change that means you need to move out of your house, your neighborhood, leave all of your friends, move your kids to a poorer area, etc… because of a divorce. Happens all the time and it’s tough. This woman has just not faced reality yet, but she will have to at some point.
August 17, 2009 at 7:28 AM #445458CoronitaParticipantI definitely think she’s over her head and needs to downsize…But I think this article is slightly misleading. I’m pretty sure her yearly income is more than $275k/year.
[quote]
As a vice president at MasterCard’s corporate office in Purchase, N.Y., she earns a base pay of $150,000 plus a bonus. This year she’ll take home 10 percent less because of a smaller bonus. She receives $75,000 a year in child support from her ex-husband. She figures she will pull an additional $50,000 from a personal investment account to “pick up the slack.
[/quote]$150k base salary but the bonus is unspecified. VP at a big financial institution, I’m pretty sure her bonus is at LEAST her base salary even on a bad year, if not more. And Mastercard isn’t exactly doing terrible (yet)…
Some of these exec bonuses in financials are 1.5-3 times base. I think there’s meets the eye. So I doubt you she really needs most people’s sympathy here. Still, she should have downsized though. And her issue is living up to the “image”. Common problem of americans.It’s interesting though that this area has the “appearance” of affluence. Hardly what I call afluent if one is a slave to debt.
August 17, 2009 at 7:28 AM #445652CoronitaParticipantI definitely think she’s over her head and needs to downsize…But I think this article is slightly misleading. I’m pretty sure her yearly income is more than $275k/year.
[quote]
As a vice president at MasterCard’s corporate office in Purchase, N.Y., she earns a base pay of $150,000 plus a bonus. This year she’ll take home 10 percent less because of a smaller bonus. She receives $75,000 a year in child support from her ex-husband. She figures she will pull an additional $50,000 from a personal investment account to “pick up the slack.
[/quote]$150k base salary but the bonus is unspecified. VP at a big financial institution, I’m pretty sure her bonus is at LEAST her base salary even on a bad year, if not more. And Mastercard isn’t exactly doing terrible (yet)…
Some of these exec bonuses in financials are 1.5-3 times base. I think there’s meets the eye. So I doubt you she really needs most people’s sympathy here. Still, she should have downsized though. And her issue is living up to the “image”. Common problem of americans.It’s interesting though that this area has the “appearance” of affluence. Hardly what I call afluent if one is a slave to debt.
August 17, 2009 at 7:28 AM #445990CoronitaParticipantI definitely think she’s over her head and needs to downsize…But I think this article is slightly misleading. I’m pretty sure her yearly income is more than $275k/year.
[quote]
As a vice president at MasterCard’s corporate office in Purchase, N.Y., she earns a base pay of $150,000 plus a bonus. This year she’ll take home 10 percent less because of a smaller bonus. She receives $75,000 a year in child support from her ex-husband. She figures she will pull an additional $50,000 from a personal investment account to “pick up the slack.
[/quote]$150k base salary but the bonus is unspecified. VP at a big financial institution, I’m pretty sure her bonus is at LEAST her base salary even on a bad year, if not more. And Mastercard isn’t exactly doing terrible (yet)…
Some of these exec bonuses in financials are 1.5-3 times base. I think there’s meets the eye. So I doubt you she really needs most people’s sympathy here. Still, she should have downsized though. And her issue is living up to the “image”. Common problem of americans.It’s interesting though that this area has the “appearance” of affluence. Hardly what I call afluent if one is a slave to debt.
August 17, 2009 at 7:28 AM #446061CoronitaParticipantI definitely think she’s over her head and needs to downsize…But I think this article is slightly misleading. I’m pretty sure her yearly income is more than $275k/year.
[quote]
As a vice president at MasterCard’s corporate office in Purchase, N.Y., she earns a base pay of $150,000 plus a bonus. This year she’ll take home 10 percent less because of a smaller bonus. She receives $75,000 a year in child support from her ex-husband. She figures she will pull an additional $50,000 from a personal investment account to “pick up the slack.
[/quote]$150k base salary but the bonus is unspecified. VP at a big financial institution, I’m pretty sure her bonus is at LEAST her base salary even on a bad year, if not more. And Mastercard isn’t exactly doing terrible (yet)…
Some of these exec bonuses in financials are 1.5-3 times base. I think there’s meets the eye. So I doubt you she really needs most people’s sympathy here. Still, she should have downsized though. And her issue is living up to the “image”. Common problem of americans.It’s interesting though that this area has the “appearance” of affluence. Hardly what I call afluent if one is a slave to debt.
August 17, 2009 at 7:28 AM #446242CoronitaParticipantI definitely think she’s over her head and needs to downsize…But I think this article is slightly misleading. I’m pretty sure her yearly income is more than $275k/year.
[quote]
As a vice president at MasterCard’s corporate office in Purchase, N.Y., she earns a base pay of $150,000 plus a bonus. This year she’ll take home 10 percent less because of a smaller bonus. She receives $75,000 a year in child support from her ex-husband. She figures she will pull an additional $50,000 from a personal investment account to “pick up the slack.
[/quote]$150k base salary but the bonus is unspecified. VP at a big financial institution, I’m pretty sure her bonus is at LEAST her base salary even on a bad year, if not more. And Mastercard isn’t exactly doing terrible (yet)…
Some of these exec bonuses in financials are 1.5-3 times base. I think there’s meets the eye. So I doubt you she really needs most people’s sympathy here. Still, she should have downsized though. And her issue is living up to the “image”. Common problem of americans.It’s interesting though that this area has the “appearance” of affluence. Hardly what I call afluent if one is a slave to debt.
August 17, 2009 at 7:53 AM #445463scaredyclassicParticipantnot sure exactly what i mean; i see that she’s in over her head, but somehow im not pissed at her. it’s like a death or something. she never pictured herself getting divorced because of her parents. rationality doesn’t enter into it. she’s not really living extravagantly other than the house part. and the house part is highly psychological, in terms of her kids, etc. yeah she shouldve been 100% cold and calculating on divorce, but she wasn’t and somehow, in this case, im not offended by her mindset. i’d be concerned for her financially, but , not , like angry. might be irraitonal on my part too
August 17, 2009 at 7:53 AM #445657scaredyclassicParticipantnot sure exactly what i mean; i see that she’s in over her head, but somehow im not pissed at her. it’s like a death or something. she never pictured herself getting divorced because of her parents. rationality doesn’t enter into it. she’s not really living extravagantly other than the house part. and the house part is highly psychological, in terms of her kids, etc. yeah she shouldve been 100% cold and calculating on divorce, but she wasn’t and somehow, in this case, im not offended by her mindset. i’d be concerned for her financially, but , not , like angry. might be irraitonal on my part too
August 17, 2009 at 7:53 AM #445995scaredyclassicParticipantnot sure exactly what i mean; i see that she’s in over her head, but somehow im not pissed at her. it’s like a death or something. she never pictured herself getting divorced because of her parents. rationality doesn’t enter into it. she’s not really living extravagantly other than the house part. and the house part is highly psychological, in terms of her kids, etc. yeah she shouldve been 100% cold and calculating on divorce, but she wasn’t and somehow, in this case, im not offended by her mindset. i’d be concerned for her financially, but , not , like angry. might be irraitonal on my part too
August 17, 2009 at 7:53 AM #446066scaredyclassicParticipantnot sure exactly what i mean; i see that she’s in over her head, but somehow im not pissed at her. it’s like a death or something. she never pictured herself getting divorced because of her parents. rationality doesn’t enter into it. she’s not really living extravagantly other than the house part. and the house part is highly psychological, in terms of her kids, etc. yeah she shouldve been 100% cold and calculating on divorce, but she wasn’t and somehow, in this case, im not offended by her mindset. i’d be concerned for her financially, but , not , like angry. might be irraitonal on my part too
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.