Dollar Dropping

[partypup]

[quote=smshorttimer][quote=partypup]
LOL. My dear sweet Concho, there are SO many ways to move metals out of the country. You need to educate yourself. But for starters, you need to learn to anticipate. Yes, if you are as slow as you seem to be now in picking up trends, then you will probably get nailed because you won’t head to the border until the hammer has already fallen. Driving across the border (and catching a plane from there) is also always an option. Quite easy to stash your metals in a car – unless you think we will soon reach a point where the U.S. will search ALL exiting vehicles for metals and cash. In which case, if you truly believe that’s on the horizon, then I would encourage you to leave the country NOW. Because I very much doubt you’d want to stay in a country like that, with or without metals in your possession.[/quote]

Can my family stay at your Colo bunker when you split? There’s some gold ETFs in it for ya.[/quote]

Shorty, ALL piggs are welcome in my bunker!!!!

[Arraya]

Professor Igor Panarin, whose book “The Crash of America” is just out, claims that by November the book will be yesterday’s news.

Panarin still leaves room for miscalculation, which would actually make him happy. And should the collapse not start in November, he is ready to explain why it didn’t happen by December. But at the moment, the collapse looks quite likely.

“In my opinion, the probability of the US ceasing to exist by June, 2010 exceeds 50%. At this point, the mission of all major international powers is to prevent chaos in the US,” Panarin concluded.

“The US debt has multiplied seven times in 11 years. Under Gorbachev the Soviet debt increased by a factor of five.”

http://cfecon.blogspot.com/2009/09/igor-panarin-sticking-to-his-november.html

[Arraya]

Professor Igor Panarin, whose book “The Crash of America” is just out, claims that by November the book will be yesterday’s news.

Panarin still leaves room for miscalculation, which would actually make him happy. And should the collapse not start in November, he is ready to explain why it didn’t happen by December. But at the moment, the collapse looks quite likely.

“In my opinion, the probability of the US ceasing to exist by June, 2010 exceeds 50%. At this point, the mission of all major international powers is to prevent chaos in the US,” Panarin concluded.

“The US debt has multiplied seven times in 11 years. Under Gorbachev the Soviet debt increased by a factor of five.”

http://cfecon.blogspot.com/2009/09/igor-panarin-sticking-to-his-november.html

[Arraya]

Professor Igor Panarin, whose book “The Crash of America” is just out, claims that by November the book will be yesterday’s news.

Panarin still leaves room for miscalculation, which would actually make him happy. And should the collapse not start in November, he is ready to explain why it didn’t happen by December. But at the moment, the collapse looks quite likely.

“In my opinion, the probability of the US ceasing to exist by June, 2010 exceeds 50%. At this point, the mission of all major international powers is to prevent chaos in the US,” Panarin concluded.

“The US debt has multiplied seven times in 11 years. Under Gorbachev the Soviet debt increased by a factor of five.”

http://cfecon.blogspot.com/2009/09/igor-panarin-sticking-to-his-november.html

[Arraya]

Professor Igor Panarin, whose book “The Crash of America” is just out, claims that by November the book will be yesterday’s news.

Panarin still leaves room for miscalculation, which would actually make him happy. And should the collapse not start in November, he is ready to explain why it didn’t happen by December. But at the moment, the collapse looks quite likely.

“In my opinion, the probability of the US ceasing to exist by June, 2010 exceeds 50%. At this point, the mission of all major international powers is to prevent chaos in the US,” Panarin concluded.

“The US debt has multiplied seven times in 11 years. Under Gorbachev the Soviet debt increased by a factor of five.”

http://cfecon.blogspot.com/2009/09/igor-panarin-sticking-to-his-november.html

[Arraya]

Professor Igor Panarin, whose book “The Crash of America” is just out, claims that by November the book will be yesterday’s news.

Panarin still leaves room for miscalculation, which would actually make him happy. And should the collapse not start in November, he is ready to explain why it didn’t happen by December. But at the moment, the collapse looks quite likely.

“In my opinion, the probability of the US ceasing to exist by June, 2010 exceeds 50%. At this point, the mission of all major international powers is to prevent chaos in the US,” Panarin concluded.

“The US debt has multiplied seven times in 11 years. Under Gorbachev the Soviet debt increased by a factor of five.”

http://cfecon.blogspot.com/2009/09/igor-panarin-sticking-to-his-november.html

[Disgruntled Patriot]

I always enjoy reading this debate between the gold-bug contrapreneurs and apple-pie econohobbyists. IMHO, the gold bugs typically draw a more likely conclusion and I want to believe the world will eventually call out the emperor for not wearing clothes. But there is this obvious geopolitical circumstance that neither side ever seems to consider: Uncle Sammy’s stockpile of over 5,000 pointy-tipped packages of potential energy, distributed across a robust network of airfields, silos, warships and submarines. One might argue that this unprecedented arsenal better secures the reserve status of a fiat currency, and the fraudulent banking system which spews it, than any imaginable vault of gold. What do you think?

[Disgruntled Patriot]

I always enjoy reading this debate between the gold-bug contrapreneurs and apple-pie econohobbyists. IMHO, the gold bugs typically draw a more likely conclusion and I want to believe the world will eventually call out the emperor for not wearing clothes. But there is this obvious geopolitical circumstance that neither side ever seems to consider: Uncle Sammy’s stockpile of over 5,000 pointy-tipped packages of potential energy, distributed across a robust network of airfields, silos, warships and submarines. One might argue that this unprecedented arsenal better secures the reserve status of a fiat currency, and the fraudulent banking system which spews it, than any imaginable vault of gold. What do you think?

[Disgruntled Patriot]

I always enjoy reading this debate between the gold-bug contrapreneurs and apple-pie econohobbyists. IMHO, the gold bugs typically draw a more likely conclusion and I want to believe the world will eventually call out the emperor for not wearing clothes. But there is this obvious geopolitical circumstance that neither side ever seems to consider: Uncle Sammy’s stockpile of over 5,000 pointy-tipped packages of potential energy, distributed across a robust network of airfields, silos, warships and submarines. One might argue that this unprecedented arsenal better secures the reserve status of a fiat currency, and the fraudulent banking system which spews it, than any imaginable vault of gold. What do you think?

[Disgruntled Patriot]

I always enjoy reading this debate between the gold-bug contrapreneurs and apple-pie econohobbyists. IMHO, the gold bugs typically draw a more likely conclusion and I want to believe the world will eventually call out the emperor for not wearing clothes. But there is this obvious geopolitical circumstance that neither side ever seems to consider: Uncle Sammy’s stockpile of over 5,000 pointy-tipped packages of potential energy, distributed across a robust network of airfields, silos, warships and submarines. One might argue that this unprecedented arsenal better secures the reserve status of a fiat currency, and the fraudulent banking system which spews it, than any imaginable vault of gold. What do you think?

[Disgruntled Patriot]

I always enjoy reading this debate between the gold-bug contrapreneurs and apple-pie econohobbyists. IMHO, the gold bugs typically draw a more likely conclusion and I want to believe the world will eventually call out the emperor for not wearing clothes. But there is this obvious geopolitical circumstance that neither side ever seems to consider: Uncle Sammy’s stockpile of over 5,000 pointy-tipped packages of potential energy, distributed across a robust network of airfields, silos, warships and submarines. One might argue that this unprecedented arsenal better secures the reserve status of a fiat currency, and the fraudulent banking system which spews it, than any imaginable vault of gold. What do you think?

[paramount]

[quote=Disgruntled Patriot]I always enjoy reading this debate between the gold-bug contrapreneurs and apple-pie econohobbyists. IMHO, the gold bugs typically draw a more likely conclusion and I want to believe the world will eventually call out the emperor for not wearing clothes. But there is this obvious geopolitical circumstance that neither side ever seems to consider: Uncle Sammy’s stockpile of over 5,000 pointy-tipped packages of potential energy, distributed across a robust network of airfields, silos, warships and submarines. One might argue that this unprecedented arsenal better secures the reserve status of a fiat currency, and the fraudulent banking system which spews it, than any imaginable vault of gold. What do you think?[/quote]

I think your suggestion is almost completely ridiculous.

[paramount]

[quote=Disgruntled Patriot]I always enjoy reading this debate between the gold-bug contrapreneurs and apple-pie econohobbyists. IMHO, the gold bugs typically draw a more likely conclusion and I want to believe the world will eventually call out the emperor for not wearing clothes. But there is this obvious geopolitical circumstance that neither side ever seems to consider: Uncle Sammy’s stockpile of over 5,000 pointy-tipped packages of potential energy, distributed across a robust network of airfields, silos, warships and submarines. One might argue that this unprecedented arsenal better secures the reserve status of a fiat currency, and the fraudulent banking system which spews it, than any imaginable vault of gold. What do you think?[/quote]

I think your suggestion is almost completely ridiculous.

[paramount]

[quote=Disgruntled Patriot]I always enjoy reading this debate between the gold-bug contrapreneurs and apple-pie econohobbyists. IMHO, the gold bugs typically draw a more likely conclusion and I want to believe the world will eventually call out the emperor for not wearing clothes. But there is this obvious geopolitical circumstance that neither side ever seems to consider: Uncle Sammy’s stockpile of over 5,000 pointy-tipped packages of potential energy, distributed across a robust network of airfields, silos, warships and submarines. One might argue that this unprecedented arsenal better secures the reserve status of a fiat currency, and the fraudulent banking system which spews it, than any imaginable vault of gold. What do you think?[/quote]

I think your suggestion is almost completely ridiculous.

[paramount]

[quote=Disgruntled Patriot]I always enjoy reading this debate between the gold-bug contrapreneurs and apple-pie econohobbyists. IMHO, the gold bugs typically draw a more likely conclusion and I want to believe the world will eventually call out the emperor for not wearing clothes. But there is this obvious geopolitical circumstance that neither side ever seems to consider: Uncle Sammy’s stockpile of over 5,000 pointy-tipped packages of potential energy, distributed across a robust network of airfields, silos, warships and submarines. One might argue that this unprecedented arsenal better secures the reserve status of a fiat currency, and the fraudulent banking system which spews it, than any imaginable vault of gold. What do you think?[/quote]

I think your suggestion is almost completely ridiculous.

[Author]

Posts