- This topic has 160 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by stansd.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 24, 2009 at 8:15 PM #335717January 25, 2009 at 12:24 AM #335280DWCAPParticipant
[quote=temeculaguy]DWCAP, I think you misinterpreted HLS’ post. He was not claiming that Irvine, Santa Clarita and Temecula boomed and then were cut off by high gas prices. He was pointing out that over time in So Cal, we’ve had ups and downs but this latest up was an exception, that we aren’t in a housing crisis but rather a needed reset to reality and traditional financing. Having lived in two of the three aforementioned regions during their booms, in the case of Irvine in the 1970’s and Santa Clarita of the 1980’s, both attracted people and ended up quite autonomous today, especially Irvine. Irvine isn’t being cut off because people can’t afford to get to their jobs from there, the jobs are there now.
People didn’t stop buying because of commodity prices, people stopped because the prices were fundamentally unsound, caused by destructive financing.[/quote]
Actually, I think you misread my post. I totally agree with HLS that the problem is that housing because unaffordable to almost everyone without BS programs. This is a return to fundamentals, an action of the invisable hand punishing the bad speculation of the past few years. This isnt a case where a regions dominant industry imploded and alot of people couldnt work anymore, ala detroit. This is a case where a commodity class (housing) bubbled and is now self correcting. I totally agree.
I included gas prices because it caused people to re-evaluate their habits, including commuting and home buying. And it bubbled at the same time.
My bad for being unclear.
January 25, 2009 at 12:24 AM #335604DWCAPParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]DWCAP, I think you misinterpreted HLS’ post. He was not claiming that Irvine, Santa Clarita and Temecula boomed and then were cut off by high gas prices. He was pointing out that over time in So Cal, we’ve had ups and downs but this latest up was an exception, that we aren’t in a housing crisis but rather a needed reset to reality and traditional financing. Having lived in two of the three aforementioned regions during their booms, in the case of Irvine in the 1970’s and Santa Clarita of the 1980’s, both attracted people and ended up quite autonomous today, especially Irvine. Irvine isn’t being cut off because people can’t afford to get to their jobs from there, the jobs are there now.
People didn’t stop buying because of commodity prices, people stopped because the prices were fundamentally unsound, caused by destructive financing.[/quote]
Actually, I think you misread my post. I totally agree with HLS that the problem is that housing because unaffordable to almost everyone without BS programs. This is a return to fundamentals, an action of the invisable hand punishing the bad speculation of the past few years. This isnt a case where a regions dominant industry imploded and alot of people couldnt work anymore, ala detroit. This is a case where a commodity class (housing) bubbled and is now self correcting. I totally agree.
I included gas prices because it caused people to re-evaluate their habits, including commuting and home buying. And it bubbled at the same time.
My bad for being unclear.
January 25, 2009 at 12:24 AM #335692DWCAPParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]DWCAP, I think you misinterpreted HLS’ post. He was not claiming that Irvine, Santa Clarita and Temecula boomed and then were cut off by high gas prices. He was pointing out that over time in So Cal, we’ve had ups and downs but this latest up was an exception, that we aren’t in a housing crisis but rather a needed reset to reality and traditional financing. Having lived in two of the three aforementioned regions during their booms, in the case of Irvine in the 1970’s and Santa Clarita of the 1980’s, both attracted people and ended up quite autonomous today, especially Irvine. Irvine isn’t being cut off because people can’t afford to get to their jobs from there, the jobs are there now.
People didn’t stop buying because of commodity prices, people stopped because the prices were fundamentally unsound, caused by destructive financing.[/quote]
Actually, I think you misread my post. I totally agree with HLS that the problem is that housing because unaffordable to almost everyone without BS programs. This is a return to fundamentals, an action of the invisable hand punishing the bad speculation of the past few years. This isnt a case where a regions dominant industry imploded and alot of people couldnt work anymore, ala detroit. This is a case where a commodity class (housing) bubbled and is now self correcting. I totally agree.
I included gas prices because it caused people to re-evaluate their habits, including commuting and home buying. And it bubbled at the same time.
My bad for being unclear.
January 25, 2009 at 12:24 AM #335720DWCAPParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]DWCAP, I think you misinterpreted HLS’ post. He was not claiming that Irvine, Santa Clarita and Temecula boomed and then were cut off by high gas prices. He was pointing out that over time in So Cal, we’ve had ups and downs but this latest up was an exception, that we aren’t in a housing crisis but rather a needed reset to reality and traditional financing. Having lived in two of the three aforementioned regions during their booms, in the case of Irvine in the 1970’s and Santa Clarita of the 1980’s, both attracted people and ended up quite autonomous today, especially Irvine. Irvine isn’t being cut off because people can’t afford to get to their jobs from there, the jobs are there now.
People didn’t stop buying because of commodity prices, people stopped because the prices were fundamentally unsound, caused by destructive financing.[/quote]
Actually, I think you misread my post. I totally agree with HLS that the problem is that housing because unaffordable to almost everyone without BS programs. This is a return to fundamentals, an action of the invisable hand punishing the bad speculation of the past few years. This isnt a case where a regions dominant industry imploded and alot of people couldnt work anymore, ala detroit. This is a case where a commodity class (housing) bubbled and is now self correcting. I totally agree.
I included gas prices because it caused people to re-evaluate their habits, including commuting and home buying. And it bubbled at the same time.
My bad for being unclear.
January 25, 2009 at 12:24 AM #335807DWCAPParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]DWCAP, I think you misinterpreted HLS’ post. He was not claiming that Irvine, Santa Clarita and Temecula boomed and then were cut off by high gas prices. He was pointing out that over time in So Cal, we’ve had ups and downs but this latest up was an exception, that we aren’t in a housing crisis but rather a needed reset to reality and traditional financing. Having lived in two of the three aforementioned regions during their booms, in the case of Irvine in the 1970’s and Santa Clarita of the 1980’s, both attracted people and ended up quite autonomous today, especially Irvine. Irvine isn’t being cut off because people can’t afford to get to their jobs from there, the jobs are there now.
People didn’t stop buying because of commodity prices, people stopped because the prices were fundamentally unsound, caused by destructive financing.[/quote]
Actually, I think you misread my post. I totally agree with HLS that the problem is that housing because unaffordable to almost everyone without BS programs. This is a return to fundamentals, an action of the invisable hand punishing the bad speculation of the past few years. This isnt a case where a regions dominant industry imploded and alot of people couldnt work anymore, ala detroit. This is a case where a commodity class (housing) bubbled and is now self correcting. I totally agree.
I included gas prices because it caused people to re-evaluate their habits, including commuting and home buying. And it bubbled at the same time.
My bad for being unclear.
January 25, 2009 at 1:48 AM #335304temeculaguyParticipantI took your post to literal, your clarification makes sense to me now and I agree with it. You have to realize on the weekend I’m more drunk than during the week so you need to dumb it down for me on weekends. Were good, Hugs.
“Invisible Hand”, now your talking my language, I’m thinking of sending copies of Adam Smith’s book to the fed governors and Obama in hopes they will realize that things never change and they will be better off if they keep their remaining tarp money to themselves and letting this thing play out on it’s own. The invisible hand will have it’s way no matter what they spend, we can get to the same point with less debt if they just let it happen.
January 25, 2009 at 1:48 AM #335629temeculaguyParticipantI took your post to literal, your clarification makes sense to me now and I agree with it. You have to realize on the weekend I’m more drunk than during the week so you need to dumb it down for me on weekends. Were good, Hugs.
“Invisible Hand”, now your talking my language, I’m thinking of sending copies of Adam Smith’s book to the fed governors and Obama in hopes they will realize that things never change and they will be better off if they keep their remaining tarp money to themselves and letting this thing play out on it’s own. The invisible hand will have it’s way no matter what they spend, we can get to the same point with less debt if they just let it happen.
January 25, 2009 at 1:48 AM #335716temeculaguyParticipantI took your post to literal, your clarification makes sense to me now and I agree with it. You have to realize on the weekend I’m more drunk than during the week so you need to dumb it down for me on weekends. Were good, Hugs.
“Invisible Hand”, now your talking my language, I’m thinking of sending copies of Adam Smith’s book to the fed governors and Obama in hopes they will realize that things never change and they will be better off if they keep their remaining tarp money to themselves and letting this thing play out on it’s own. The invisible hand will have it’s way no matter what they spend, we can get to the same point with less debt if they just let it happen.
January 25, 2009 at 1:48 AM #335745temeculaguyParticipantI took your post to literal, your clarification makes sense to me now and I agree with it. You have to realize on the weekend I’m more drunk than during the week so you need to dumb it down for me on weekends. Were good, Hugs.
“Invisible Hand”, now your talking my language, I’m thinking of sending copies of Adam Smith’s book to the fed governors and Obama in hopes they will realize that things never change and they will be better off if they keep their remaining tarp money to themselves and letting this thing play out on it’s own. The invisible hand will have it’s way no matter what they spend, we can get to the same point with less debt if they just let it happen.
January 25, 2009 at 1:48 AM #335832temeculaguyParticipantI took your post to literal, your clarification makes sense to me now and I agree with it. You have to realize on the weekend I’m more drunk than during the week so you need to dumb it down for me on weekends. Were good, Hugs.
“Invisible Hand”, now your talking my language, I’m thinking of sending copies of Adam Smith’s book to the fed governors and Obama in hopes they will realize that things never change and they will be better off if they keep their remaining tarp money to themselves and letting this thing play out on it’s own. The invisible hand will have it’s way no matter what they spend, we can get to the same point with less debt if they just let it happen.
January 25, 2009 at 3:55 AM #3353194plexownerParticipanttemeculaguy – you mean you don’t think that 3 million shovel jobs are going to save our FIRE economy? that’s unpatriotic, dude! be careful or homeland security may come knocking
January 25, 2009 at 3:55 AM #3356444plexownerParticipanttemeculaguy – you mean you don’t think that 3 million shovel jobs are going to save our FIRE economy? that’s unpatriotic, dude! be careful or homeland security may come knocking
January 25, 2009 at 3:55 AM #3357314plexownerParticipanttemeculaguy – you mean you don’t think that 3 million shovel jobs are going to save our FIRE economy? that’s unpatriotic, dude! be careful or homeland security may come knocking
January 25, 2009 at 3:55 AM #3357604plexownerParticipanttemeculaguy – you mean you don’t think that 3 million shovel jobs are going to save our FIRE economy? that’s unpatriotic, dude! be careful or homeland security may come knocking
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.