Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Client needs a loan
- This topic has 60 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by Troubled Loner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 20, 2010 at 3:00 PM #620797October 20, 2010 at 3:13 PM #621566CoronitaParticipant
Questions:
* Is the $300k equity their estimate or is an appraised estimate?
* How old are they (roughly)?
Just curious….(PM me if you rather not say.)
October 20, 2010 at 3:13 PM #621445CoronitaParticipantQuestions:
* Is the $300k equity their estimate or is an appraised estimate?
* How old are they (roughly)?
Just curious….(PM me if you rather not say.)
October 20, 2010 at 3:13 PM #621885CoronitaParticipantQuestions:
* Is the $300k equity their estimate or is an appraised estimate?
* How old are they (roughly)?
Just curious….(PM me if you rather not say.)
October 20, 2010 at 3:13 PM #620887CoronitaParticipantQuestions:
* Is the $300k equity their estimate or is an appraised estimate?
* How old are they (roughly)?
Just curious….(PM me if you rather not say.)
October 20, 2010 at 3:13 PM #620807CoronitaParticipantQuestions:
* Is the $300k equity their estimate or is an appraised estimate?
* How old are they (roughly)?
Just curious….(PM me if you rather not say.)
October 20, 2010 at 3:21 PM #620902NotCrankyParticipantSounds like they shouldn’t do it. This might be a “poster child” case for why we need national health care. Poor people get free health care. Rich people can afford it and people just a notch or two above poverty have to pay disproportionately relative to their capacity(even for insurance) or take a relatively large, if not ruinous hit to all they have worked for because of illness.
October 20, 2010 at 3:21 PM #621900NotCrankyParticipantSounds like they shouldn’t do it. This might be a “poster child” case for why we need national health care. Poor people get free health care. Rich people can afford it and people just a notch or two above poverty have to pay disproportionately relative to their capacity(even for insurance) or take a relatively large, if not ruinous hit to all they have worked for because of illness.
October 20, 2010 at 3:21 PM #620822NotCrankyParticipantSounds like they shouldn’t do it. This might be a “poster child” case for why we need national health care. Poor people get free health care. Rich people can afford it and people just a notch or two above poverty have to pay disproportionately relative to their capacity(even for insurance) or take a relatively large, if not ruinous hit to all they have worked for because of illness.
October 20, 2010 at 3:21 PM #621460NotCrankyParticipantSounds like they shouldn’t do it. This might be a “poster child” case for why we need national health care. Poor people get free health care. Rich people can afford it and people just a notch or two above poverty have to pay disproportionately relative to their capacity(even for insurance) or take a relatively large, if not ruinous hit to all they have worked for because of illness.
October 20, 2010 at 3:21 PM #621581NotCrankyParticipantSounds like they shouldn’t do it. This might be a “poster child” case for why we need national health care. Poor people get free health care. Rich people can afford it and people just a notch or two above poverty have to pay disproportionately relative to their capacity(even for insurance) or take a relatively large, if not ruinous hit to all they have worked for because of illness.
October 20, 2010 at 3:40 PM #620907Troubled LonerParticipantflu, they (husband and wife) are mid-50’s. Their equity estimate is actually higher, I believe $300,000 is accurate.
Russell, they both have medical conditions, cannot get medical insurance. They have depleted their IRA’s and pensions down to nothing, they can no longer pay the medical bills, and they are considering bankruptcy, but really don’t want to (they don’t feel it is right ethically). If they were able to pay off the $75,000 of medical bills, they would probably be OK (the monthly payments are quite high).
October 20, 2010 at 3:40 PM #621905Troubled LonerParticipantflu, they (husband and wife) are mid-50’s. Their equity estimate is actually higher, I believe $300,000 is accurate.
Russell, they both have medical conditions, cannot get medical insurance. They have depleted their IRA’s and pensions down to nothing, they can no longer pay the medical bills, and they are considering bankruptcy, but really don’t want to (they don’t feel it is right ethically). If they were able to pay off the $75,000 of medical bills, they would probably be OK (the monthly payments are quite high).
October 20, 2010 at 3:40 PM #621465Troubled LonerParticipantflu, they (husband and wife) are mid-50’s. Their equity estimate is actually higher, I believe $300,000 is accurate.
Russell, they both have medical conditions, cannot get medical insurance. They have depleted their IRA’s and pensions down to nothing, they can no longer pay the medical bills, and they are considering bankruptcy, but really don’t want to (they don’t feel it is right ethically). If they were able to pay off the $75,000 of medical bills, they would probably be OK (the monthly payments are quite high).
October 20, 2010 at 3:40 PM #620827Troubled LonerParticipantflu, they (husband and wife) are mid-50’s. Their equity estimate is actually higher, I believe $300,000 is accurate.
Russell, they both have medical conditions, cannot get medical insurance. They have depleted their IRA’s and pensions down to nothing, they can no longer pay the medical bills, and they are considering bankruptcy, but really don’t want to (they don’t feel it is right ethically). If they were able to pay off the $75,000 of medical bills, they would probably be OK (the monthly payments are quite high).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.