Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Carlsbad or Penasquitos for 500K?
- This topic has 795 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by
UCGal.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 8, 2011 at 8:12 PM #650698January 8, 2011 at 8:35 PM #649608
Scarlett
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
Scarlett . . . uh, hello??You said yourself that the family room was taken from the sf of a bedroom. Had you ever considered whether this property might qualify for an FHA 203K loan?? You would put little down and save cash for future repairs/rehab (as well as the cash you are eventually loaned over and above your purchase-money amt which could be used for repairs/rehab).
Had you ever thought of moving this (probably 19′ x 19′) “substandard garage” to the ample backyard? How much $$ do you think this takes?? Try $25-$30K.
Why don’t you use the current inspection report on file to attempt to obtain this “estate” property in the $350-$375K range??
Think outside of the box or DRIVE. Those are your choices, here, the way I see it.[/quote]
Hello, you haven’t been in there! I didn’t say the sf was taken from a bedroom. I said the family was an addition. Also one of the bedrooms seem to be an addition. This was originally a 1100-1200 sf SFR.
GO SEE it, look carefully up and down and then talk. The floorplan was really bad. Forget about the garage – we could live with it. That wasn’t the deal breaker Let’s even assume the foundation was fine and the termite damage was limited – which I don’t think was. I described them only to make a more complete report not to argue about it.
You dismissed my comments about what WAS the deal breaker and talk about me not thinking about out of the box on minor points – when YOU have NOT been inside the place.
A lot of walls would have needed to be torn down and the floorplan completely redesigned to make 3 suitable bedrooms and decent sized kitchen. It wasn’t simply moving only one or two walls to partition better. We thought about it, we even looked to see if we can make an additional room to the house. So THAT was the deal breaker.
I don’t think that tearing down the house and rebuilding costs only 100K do you? I highly doubt that one could get the house for 350K. Only the land is worth more I believe, in UC.
No thanks, I’ll pass. Let other people who don’t mind the hassle do it. Minor cosmetic fixers, this was NOT.
There will ALWAYS be other houses. If not here, then someplace else. Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?
January 8, 2011 at 8:35 PM #649677Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
Scarlett . . . uh, hello??You said yourself that the family room was taken from the sf of a bedroom. Had you ever considered whether this property might qualify for an FHA 203K loan?? You would put little down and save cash for future repairs/rehab (as well as the cash you are eventually loaned over and above your purchase-money amt which could be used for repairs/rehab).
Had you ever thought of moving this (probably 19′ x 19′) “substandard garage” to the ample backyard? How much $$ do you think this takes?? Try $25-$30K.
Why don’t you use the current inspection report on file to attempt to obtain this “estate” property in the $350-$375K range??
Think outside of the box or DRIVE. Those are your choices, here, the way I see it.[/quote]
Hello, you haven’t been in there! I didn’t say the sf was taken from a bedroom. I said the family was an addition. Also one of the bedrooms seem to be an addition. This was originally a 1100-1200 sf SFR.
GO SEE it, look carefully up and down and then talk. The floorplan was really bad. Forget about the garage – we could live with it. That wasn’t the deal breaker Let’s even assume the foundation was fine and the termite damage was limited – which I don’t think was. I described them only to make a more complete report not to argue about it.
You dismissed my comments about what WAS the deal breaker and talk about me not thinking about out of the box on minor points – when YOU have NOT been inside the place.
A lot of walls would have needed to be torn down and the floorplan completely redesigned to make 3 suitable bedrooms and decent sized kitchen. It wasn’t simply moving only one or two walls to partition better. We thought about it, we even looked to see if we can make an additional room to the house. So THAT was the deal breaker.
I don’t think that tearing down the house and rebuilding costs only 100K do you? I highly doubt that one could get the house for 350K. Only the land is worth more I believe, in UC.
No thanks, I’ll pass. Let other people who don’t mind the hassle do it. Minor cosmetic fixers, this was NOT.
There will ALWAYS be other houses. If not here, then someplace else. Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?
January 8, 2011 at 8:35 PM #650263Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
Scarlett . . . uh, hello??You said yourself that the family room was taken from the sf of a bedroom. Had you ever considered whether this property might qualify for an FHA 203K loan?? You would put little down and save cash for future repairs/rehab (as well as the cash you are eventually loaned over and above your purchase-money amt which could be used for repairs/rehab).
Had you ever thought of moving this (probably 19′ x 19′) “substandard garage” to the ample backyard? How much $$ do you think this takes?? Try $25-$30K.
Why don’t you use the current inspection report on file to attempt to obtain this “estate” property in the $350-$375K range??
Think outside of the box or DRIVE. Those are your choices, here, the way I see it.[/quote]
Hello, you haven’t been in there! I didn’t say the sf was taken from a bedroom. I said the family was an addition. Also one of the bedrooms seem to be an addition. This was originally a 1100-1200 sf SFR.
GO SEE it, look carefully up and down and then talk. The floorplan was really bad. Forget about the garage – we could live with it. That wasn’t the deal breaker Let’s even assume the foundation was fine and the termite damage was limited – which I don’t think was. I described them only to make a more complete report not to argue about it.
You dismissed my comments about what WAS the deal breaker and talk about me not thinking about out of the box on minor points – when YOU have NOT been inside the place.
A lot of walls would have needed to be torn down and the floorplan completely redesigned to make 3 suitable bedrooms and decent sized kitchen. It wasn’t simply moving only one or two walls to partition better. We thought about it, we even looked to see if we can make an additional room to the house. So THAT was the deal breaker.
I don’t think that tearing down the house and rebuilding costs only 100K do you? I highly doubt that one could get the house for 350K. Only the land is worth more I believe, in UC.
No thanks, I’ll pass. Let other people who don’t mind the hassle do it. Minor cosmetic fixers, this was NOT.
There will ALWAYS be other houses. If not here, then someplace else. Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?
January 8, 2011 at 8:35 PM #650398Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
Scarlett . . . uh, hello??You said yourself that the family room was taken from the sf of a bedroom. Had you ever considered whether this property might qualify for an FHA 203K loan?? You would put little down and save cash for future repairs/rehab (as well as the cash you are eventually loaned over and above your purchase-money amt which could be used for repairs/rehab).
Had you ever thought of moving this (probably 19′ x 19′) “substandard garage” to the ample backyard? How much $$ do you think this takes?? Try $25-$30K.
Why don’t you use the current inspection report on file to attempt to obtain this “estate” property in the $350-$375K range??
Think outside of the box or DRIVE. Those are your choices, here, the way I see it.[/quote]
Hello, you haven’t been in there! I didn’t say the sf was taken from a bedroom. I said the family was an addition. Also one of the bedrooms seem to be an addition. This was originally a 1100-1200 sf SFR.
GO SEE it, look carefully up and down and then talk. The floorplan was really bad. Forget about the garage – we could live with it. That wasn’t the deal breaker Let’s even assume the foundation was fine and the termite damage was limited – which I don’t think was. I described them only to make a more complete report not to argue about it.
You dismissed my comments about what WAS the deal breaker and talk about me not thinking about out of the box on minor points – when YOU have NOT been inside the place.
A lot of walls would have needed to be torn down and the floorplan completely redesigned to make 3 suitable bedrooms and decent sized kitchen. It wasn’t simply moving only one or two walls to partition better. We thought about it, we even looked to see if we can make an additional room to the house. So THAT was the deal breaker.
I don’t think that tearing down the house and rebuilding costs only 100K do you? I highly doubt that one could get the house for 350K. Only the land is worth more I believe, in UC.
No thanks, I’ll pass. Let other people who don’t mind the hassle do it. Minor cosmetic fixers, this was NOT.
There will ALWAYS be other houses. If not here, then someplace else. Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?
January 8, 2011 at 8:35 PM #650723Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
Scarlett . . . uh, hello??You said yourself that the family room was taken from the sf of a bedroom. Had you ever considered whether this property might qualify for an FHA 203K loan?? You would put little down and save cash for future repairs/rehab (as well as the cash you are eventually loaned over and above your purchase-money amt which could be used for repairs/rehab).
Had you ever thought of moving this (probably 19′ x 19′) “substandard garage” to the ample backyard? How much $$ do you think this takes?? Try $25-$30K.
Why don’t you use the current inspection report on file to attempt to obtain this “estate” property in the $350-$375K range??
Think outside of the box or DRIVE. Those are your choices, here, the way I see it.[/quote]
Hello, you haven’t been in there! I didn’t say the sf was taken from a bedroom. I said the family was an addition. Also one of the bedrooms seem to be an addition. This was originally a 1100-1200 sf SFR.
GO SEE it, look carefully up and down and then talk. The floorplan was really bad. Forget about the garage – we could live with it. That wasn’t the deal breaker Let’s even assume the foundation was fine and the termite damage was limited – which I don’t think was. I described them only to make a more complete report not to argue about it.
You dismissed my comments about what WAS the deal breaker and talk about me not thinking about out of the box on minor points – when YOU have NOT been inside the place.
A lot of walls would have needed to be torn down and the floorplan completely redesigned to make 3 suitable bedrooms and decent sized kitchen. It wasn’t simply moving only one or two walls to partition better. We thought about it, we even looked to see if we can make an additional room to the house. So THAT was the deal breaker.
I don’t think that tearing down the house and rebuilding costs only 100K do you? I highly doubt that one could get the house for 350K. Only the land is worth more I believe, in UC.
No thanks, I’ll pass. Let other people who don’t mind the hassle do it. Minor cosmetic fixers, this was NOT.
There will ALWAYS be other houses. If not here, then someplace else. Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?
January 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM #649613an
Participant[quote=Scarlett]Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?[/quote]
Unless you have a chisel and a lot of time, you can convert that square peg into a round peg :-). Just don’t expect it to be perfectly round.January 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM #649682Participant[quote=Scarlett]Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?[/quote]
Unless you have a chisel and a lot of time, you can convert that square peg into a round peg :-). Just don’t expect it to be perfectly round.January 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM #650268Participant[quote=Scarlett]Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?[/quote]
Unless you have a chisel and a lot of time, you can convert that square peg into a round peg :-). Just don’t expect it to be perfectly round.January 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM #650403Participant[quote=Scarlett]Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?[/quote]
Unless you have a chisel and a lot of time, you can convert that square peg into a round peg :-). Just don’t expect it to be perfectly round.January 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM #650728Participant[quote=Scarlett]Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?[/quote]
Unless you have a chisel and a lot of time, you can convert that square peg into a round peg :-). Just don’t expect it to be perfectly round.January 8, 2011 at 9:56 PM #649628bearishgurl
Participant[quote=Scarlett]Hello, you haven’t been in there! I didn’t say the sf was taken from a bedroom. I said the family was an addition. Also one of the bedrooms seem to be an addition. This was originally a 1100-1200 sf SFR.
GO SEE it, look carefully up and down and then talk. The floorplan was really bad. Forget about the garage – we could live with it. That wasn’t the deal breaker Let’s even assume the foundation was fine and the termite damage was limited – which I don’t think was. I described them only to make a more complete report not to argue about it.
You dismissed my comments about what WAS the deal breaker and talk about me not thinking about out of the box on minor points – when YOU have NOT been inside the place.
A lot of walls would have needed to be torn down and the floorplan completely redesigned to make 3 suitable bedrooms and decent sized kitchen. It wasn’t simply moving only one or two walls to partition better. We thought about it, we even looked to see if we can make an additional room to the house. So THAT was the deal breaker.
I don’t think that tearing down the house and rebuilding costs only 100K do you? I highly doubt that one could get the house for 350K. Only the land is worth more I believe, in UC.
No thanks, I’ll pass. Let other people who don’t mind the hassle do it. Minor cosmetic fixers, this was NOT.
There will ALWAYS be other houses. If not here, then someplace else. Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?[/quote]
Scarlett, I looked at the configuation of the 7600 sf corner lot on the Ramsey/Haworth corner in UC (4636 Ramsay Ave). I looked at the plat map in miniature, as offered online by ARCC. 4636 Ramsey is the biggest lot on that block and the lots are all the same shape on that block (7600 sf).
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/services/parcelmap/search.aspx?FileNum=348-12
I can’t read the small map but this lot has to be AT LEAST 75′ wide.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100061785-4636_Ramsay_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92122
Homeowners in Chula Vista ROUTINELY place HANDSOME 22′ x 22′ (and up) sf detached garages on lots only 60′ wide. These are on properties 6000-9000 sf and built between 1948 and 1962.
How do you KNOW the sellers won’t take $350K?? Have you tried making a lowball offer?? What if they reject your offer and it doesn’t sell at their “dream” price and they call you back in March/April? They just had a buyer who obtained an UNFAVORABLE inspection report and backed out, lol. Lots are NOT WORTH over $300K (unimproved) in UC unless they are at least a quarter acre (approx 11K sf).
The master closet/bathroom is VERY adequate in this house. How are you going to get a lot this big in your price range, and this close to work to boot?? Non-supporting walls are cheap to tear down.
Once again, I believe you’re sweating the small stuff. You would NOT be “going to extremes” to make this place livable for your family, IMO. Your last statements make me think you will be a perpetual fence-sitter.
I don’t need to go “inside the place.” Even as a buyer, I could care less. Bring on the tent fumigator. You won’t be paying for it.
Just remember, PRICE and LOCATION. That’s all that’s important here.
January 8, 2011 at 9:56 PM #649697Participant[quote=Scarlett]Hello, you haven’t been in there! I didn’t say the sf was taken from a bedroom. I said the family was an addition. Also one of the bedrooms seem to be an addition. This was originally a 1100-1200 sf SFR.
GO SEE it, look carefully up and down and then talk. The floorplan was really bad. Forget about the garage – we could live with it. That wasn’t the deal breaker Let’s even assume the foundation was fine and the termite damage was limited – which I don’t think was. I described them only to make a more complete report not to argue about it.
You dismissed my comments about what WAS the deal breaker and talk about me not thinking about out of the box on minor points – when YOU have NOT been inside the place.
A lot of walls would have needed to be torn down and the floorplan completely redesigned to make 3 suitable bedrooms and decent sized kitchen. It wasn’t simply moving only one or two walls to partition better. We thought about it, we even looked to see if we can make an additional room to the house. So THAT was the deal breaker.
I don’t think that tearing down the house and rebuilding costs only 100K do you? I highly doubt that one could get the house for 350K. Only the land is worth more I believe, in UC.
No thanks, I’ll pass. Let other people who don’t mind the hassle do it. Minor cosmetic fixers, this was NOT.
There will ALWAYS be other houses. If not here, then someplace else. Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?[/quote]
Scarlett, I looked at the configuation of the 7600 sf corner lot on the Ramsey/Haworth corner in UC (4636 Ramsay Ave). I looked at the plat map in miniature, as offered online by ARCC. 4636 Ramsey is the biggest lot on that block and the lots are all the same shape on that block (7600 sf).
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/services/parcelmap/search.aspx?FileNum=348-12
I can’t read the small map but this lot has to be AT LEAST 75′ wide.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100061785-4636_Ramsay_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92122
Homeowners in Chula Vista ROUTINELY place HANDSOME 22′ x 22′ (and up) sf detached garages on lots only 60′ wide. These are on properties 6000-9000 sf and built between 1948 and 1962.
How do you KNOW the sellers won’t take $350K?? Have you tried making a lowball offer?? What if they reject your offer and it doesn’t sell at their “dream” price and they call you back in March/April? They just had a buyer who obtained an UNFAVORABLE inspection report and backed out, lol. Lots are NOT WORTH over $300K (unimproved) in UC unless they are at least a quarter acre (approx 11K sf).
The master closet/bathroom is VERY adequate in this house. How are you going to get a lot this big in your price range, and this close to work to boot?? Non-supporting walls are cheap to tear down.
Once again, I believe you’re sweating the small stuff. You would NOT be “going to extremes” to make this place livable for your family, IMO. Your last statements make me think you will be a perpetual fence-sitter.
I don’t need to go “inside the place.” Even as a buyer, I could care less. Bring on the tent fumigator. You won’t be paying for it.
Just remember, PRICE and LOCATION. That’s all that’s important here.
January 8, 2011 at 9:56 PM #650283Participant[quote=Scarlett]Hello, you haven’t been in there! I didn’t say the sf was taken from a bedroom. I said the family was an addition. Also one of the bedrooms seem to be an addition. This was originally a 1100-1200 sf SFR.
GO SEE it, look carefully up and down and then talk. The floorplan was really bad. Forget about the garage – we could live with it. That wasn’t the deal breaker Let’s even assume the foundation was fine and the termite damage was limited – which I don’t think was. I described them only to make a more complete report not to argue about it.
You dismissed my comments about what WAS the deal breaker and talk about me not thinking about out of the box on minor points – when YOU have NOT been inside the place.
A lot of walls would have needed to be torn down and the floorplan completely redesigned to make 3 suitable bedrooms and decent sized kitchen. It wasn’t simply moving only one or two walls to partition better. We thought about it, we even looked to see if we can make an additional room to the house. So THAT was the deal breaker.
I don’t think that tearing down the house and rebuilding costs only 100K do you? I highly doubt that one could get the house for 350K. Only the land is worth more I believe, in UC.
No thanks, I’ll pass. Let other people who don’t mind the hassle do it. Minor cosmetic fixers, this was NOT.
There will ALWAYS be other houses. If not here, then someplace else. Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?[/quote]
Scarlett, I looked at the configuation of the 7600 sf corner lot on the Ramsey/Haworth corner in UC (4636 Ramsay Ave). I looked at the plat map in miniature, as offered online by ARCC. 4636 Ramsey is the biggest lot on that block and the lots are all the same shape on that block (7600 sf).
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/services/parcelmap/search.aspx?FileNum=348-12
I can’t read the small map but this lot has to be AT LEAST 75′ wide.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100061785-4636_Ramsay_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92122
Homeowners in Chula Vista ROUTINELY place HANDSOME 22′ x 22′ (and up) sf detached garages on lots only 60′ wide. These are on properties 6000-9000 sf and built between 1948 and 1962.
How do you KNOW the sellers won’t take $350K?? Have you tried making a lowball offer?? What if they reject your offer and it doesn’t sell at their “dream” price and they call you back in March/April? They just had a buyer who obtained an UNFAVORABLE inspection report and backed out, lol. Lots are NOT WORTH over $300K (unimproved) in UC unless they are at least a quarter acre (approx 11K sf).
The master closet/bathroom is VERY adequate in this house. How are you going to get a lot this big in your price range, and this close to work to boot?? Non-supporting walls are cheap to tear down.
Once again, I believe you’re sweating the small stuff. You would NOT be “going to extremes” to make this place livable for your family, IMO. Your last statements make me think you will be a perpetual fence-sitter.
I don’t need to go “inside the place.” Even as a buyer, I could care less. Bring on the tent fumigator. You won’t be paying for it.
Just remember, PRICE and LOCATION. That’s all that’s important here.
January 8, 2011 at 9:56 PM #650418Participant[quote=Scarlett]Hello, you haven’t been in there! I didn’t say the sf was taken from a bedroom. I said the family was an addition. Also one of the bedrooms seem to be an addition. This was originally a 1100-1200 sf SFR.
GO SEE it, look carefully up and down and then talk. The floorplan was really bad. Forget about the garage – we could live with it. That wasn’t the deal breaker Let’s even assume the foundation was fine and the termite damage was limited – which I don’t think was. I described them only to make a more complete report not to argue about it.
You dismissed my comments about what WAS the deal breaker and talk about me not thinking about out of the box on minor points – when YOU have NOT been inside the place.
A lot of walls would have needed to be torn down and the floorplan completely redesigned to make 3 suitable bedrooms and decent sized kitchen. It wasn’t simply moving only one or two walls to partition better. We thought about it, we even looked to see if we can make an additional room to the house. So THAT was the deal breaker.
I don’t think that tearing down the house and rebuilding costs only 100K do you? I highly doubt that one could get the house for 350K. Only the land is worth more I believe, in UC.
No thanks, I’ll pass. Let other people who don’t mind the hassle do it. Minor cosmetic fixers, this was NOT.
There will ALWAYS be other houses. If not here, then someplace else. Why go to such extreme lengths to fit a square peg in a round hole?[/quote]
Scarlett, I looked at the configuation of the 7600 sf corner lot on the Ramsey/Haworth corner in UC (4636 Ramsay Ave). I looked at the plat map in miniature, as offered online by ARCC. 4636 Ramsey is the biggest lot on that block and the lots are all the same shape on that block (7600 sf).
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/services/parcelmap/search.aspx?FileNum=348-12
I can’t read the small map but this lot has to be AT LEAST 75′ wide.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100061785-4636_Ramsay_Ave_San_Diego_CA_92122
Homeowners in Chula Vista ROUTINELY place HANDSOME 22′ x 22′ (and up) sf detached garages on lots only 60′ wide. These are on properties 6000-9000 sf and built between 1948 and 1962.
How do you KNOW the sellers won’t take $350K?? Have you tried making a lowball offer?? What if they reject your offer and it doesn’t sell at their “dream” price and they call you back in March/April? They just had a buyer who obtained an UNFAVORABLE inspection report and backed out, lol. Lots are NOT WORTH over $300K (unimproved) in UC unless they are at least a quarter acre (approx 11K sf).
The master closet/bathroom is VERY adequate in this house. How are you going to get a lot this big in your price range, and this close to work to boot?? Non-supporting walls are cheap to tear down.
Once again, I believe you’re sweating the small stuff. You would NOT be “going to extremes” to make this place livable for your family, IMO. Your last statements make me think you will be a perpetual fence-sitter.
I don’t need to go “inside the place.” Even as a buyer, I could care less. Bring on the tent fumigator. You won’t be paying for it.
Just remember, PRICE and LOCATION. That’s all that’s important here.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.