Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Carlsbad or Penasquitos for 500K?
- This topic has 795 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by
UCGal.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 9, 2010 at 5:15 PM #639041December 9, 2010 at 6:55 PM #637943
UCGal
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdrealtor]As for the lower scores I dont know the area as well as you but here is what I see many places. If there is alot of multi-family housing (i.e apartments like in UTC nearby) you draw a lower socio-economic demographic in. Do the kids who live in UTC attend UC high? If so that is probably what is going on.[/quote]
92121 multi-family about half UC and half LJ, slanting more to UC.[/quote]
When he says UTC I assume he means golden triangle, north of Rose Canyon. Most of that is 92122. And it’s almost entirely condos and apartment. Same zip as south UC – the part between 52 and Rose canyon. It all feeds to UC High.
December 9, 2010 at 6:55 PM #638016UCGal
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdrealtor]As for the lower scores I dont know the area as well as you but here is what I see many places. If there is alot of multi-family housing (i.e apartments like in UTC nearby) you draw a lower socio-economic demographic in. Do the kids who live in UTC attend UC high? If so that is probably what is going on.[/quote]
92121 multi-family about half UC and half LJ, slanting more to UC.[/quote]
When he says UTC I assume he means golden triangle, north of Rose Canyon. Most of that is 92122. And it’s almost entirely condos and apartment. Same zip as south UC – the part between 52 and Rose canyon. It all feeds to UC High.
December 9, 2010 at 6:55 PM #638597UCGal
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdrealtor]As for the lower scores I dont know the area as well as you but here is what I see many places. If there is alot of multi-family housing (i.e apartments like in UTC nearby) you draw a lower socio-economic demographic in. Do the kids who live in UTC attend UC high? If so that is probably what is going on.[/quote]
92121 multi-family about half UC and half LJ, slanting more to UC.[/quote]
When he says UTC I assume he means golden triangle, north of Rose Canyon. Most of that is 92122. And it’s almost entirely condos and apartment. Same zip as south UC – the part between 52 and Rose canyon. It all feeds to UC High.
December 9, 2010 at 6:55 PM #638730UCGal
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdrealtor]As for the lower scores I dont know the area as well as you but here is what I see many places. If there is alot of multi-family housing (i.e apartments like in UTC nearby) you draw a lower socio-economic demographic in. Do the kids who live in UTC attend UC high? If so that is probably what is going on.[/quote]
92121 multi-family about half UC and half LJ, slanting more to UC.[/quote]
When he says UTC I assume he means golden triangle, north of Rose Canyon. Most of that is 92122. And it’s almost entirely condos and apartment. Same zip as south UC – the part between 52 and Rose canyon. It all feeds to UC High.
December 9, 2010 at 6:55 PM #639046UCGal
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdrealtor]As for the lower scores I dont know the area as well as you but here is what I see many places. If there is alot of multi-family housing (i.e apartments like in UTC nearby) you draw a lower socio-economic demographic in. Do the kids who live in UTC attend UC high? If so that is probably what is going on.[/quote]
92121 multi-family about half UC and half LJ, slanting more to UC.[/quote]
When he says UTC I assume he means golden triangle, north of Rose Canyon. Most of that is 92122. And it’s almost entirely condos and apartment. Same zip as south UC – the part between 52 and Rose canyon. It all feeds to UC High.
December 9, 2010 at 6:58 PM #637948UCGal
ParticipantAlso to Scarlett’s point. UTC (north UC) does seem to be heavy on the academic types. Doyle Elementary is the north UC elementary school and it has decent APIs (in the 900’s).
I don’t think you can say UCHS is bad because of the multifamily stuff in UTC. If that were true, Doyle would have bad scores.
December 9, 2010 at 6:58 PM #638021UCGal
ParticipantAlso to Scarlett’s point. UTC (north UC) does seem to be heavy on the academic types. Doyle Elementary is the north UC elementary school and it has decent APIs (in the 900’s).
I don’t think you can say UCHS is bad because of the multifamily stuff in UTC. If that were true, Doyle would have bad scores.
December 9, 2010 at 6:58 PM #638602UCGal
ParticipantAlso to Scarlett’s point. UTC (north UC) does seem to be heavy on the academic types. Doyle Elementary is the north UC elementary school and it has decent APIs (in the 900’s).
I don’t think you can say UCHS is bad because of the multifamily stuff in UTC. If that were true, Doyle would have bad scores.
December 9, 2010 at 6:58 PM #638735UCGal
ParticipantAlso to Scarlett’s point. UTC (north UC) does seem to be heavy on the academic types. Doyle Elementary is the north UC elementary school and it has decent APIs (in the 900’s).
I don’t think you can say UCHS is bad because of the multifamily stuff in UTC. If that were true, Doyle would have bad scores.
December 9, 2010 at 6:58 PM #639051UCGal
ParticipantAlso to Scarlett’s point. UTC (north UC) does seem to be heavy on the academic types. Doyle Elementary is the north UC elementary school and it has decent APIs (in the 900’s).
I don’t think you can say UCHS is bad because of the multifamily stuff in UTC. If that were true, Doyle would have bad scores.
December 9, 2010 at 7:20 PM #637958bearishgurl
Participant[quote=UCGal][quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdrealtor]As for the lower scores I dont know the area as well as you but here is what I see many places. If there is alot of multi-family housing (i.e apartments like in UTC nearby) you draw a lower socio-economic demographic in. Do the kids who live in UTC attend UC high? If so that is probably what is going on.[/quote]
92121 multi-family about half UC and half LJ, slanting more to UC.[/quote]
When he says UTC I assume he means golden triangle, north of Rose Canyon. Most of that is 92122. And it’s almost entirely condos and apartment. Same zip as south UC – the part between 52 and Rose canyon. It all feeds to UC High.[/quote]
That’s what confused me, UCGal. 92122 (LJ Colony but also parts of UTC).
Yes, north of Rose Cyn … same zip as South UC. Sorry for the mixup, but both zips apply to multi-family. 92122 is northeast of the former Ardath Rd. annexation, is it not?
Thank you for the clarification.
December 9, 2010 at 7:20 PM #638031bearishgurl
Participant[quote=UCGal][quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdrealtor]As for the lower scores I dont know the area as well as you but here is what I see many places. If there is alot of multi-family housing (i.e apartments like in UTC nearby) you draw a lower socio-economic demographic in. Do the kids who live in UTC attend UC high? If so that is probably what is going on.[/quote]
92121 multi-family about half UC and half LJ, slanting more to UC.[/quote]
When he says UTC I assume he means golden triangle, north of Rose Canyon. Most of that is 92122. And it’s almost entirely condos and apartment. Same zip as south UC – the part between 52 and Rose canyon. It all feeds to UC High.[/quote]
That’s what confused me, UCGal. 92122 (LJ Colony but also parts of UTC).
Yes, north of Rose Cyn … same zip as South UC. Sorry for the mixup, but both zips apply to multi-family. 92122 is northeast of the former Ardath Rd. annexation, is it not?
Thank you for the clarification.
December 9, 2010 at 7:20 PM #638612bearishgurl
Participant[quote=UCGal][quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdrealtor]As for the lower scores I dont know the area as well as you but here is what I see many places. If there is alot of multi-family housing (i.e apartments like in UTC nearby) you draw a lower socio-economic demographic in. Do the kids who live in UTC attend UC high? If so that is probably what is going on.[/quote]
92121 multi-family about half UC and half LJ, slanting more to UC.[/quote]
When he says UTC I assume he means golden triangle, north of Rose Canyon. Most of that is 92122. And it’s almost entirely condos and apartment. Same zip as south UC – the part between 52 and Rose canyon. It all feeds to UC High.[/quote]
That’s what confused me, UCGal. 92122 (LJ Colony but also parts of UTC).
Yes, north of Rose Cyn … same zip as South UC. Sorry for the mixup, but both zips apply to multi-family. 92122 is northeast of the former Ardath Rd. annexation, is it not?
Thank you for the clarification.
December 9, 2010 at 7:20 PM #638744bearishgurl
Participant[quote=UCGal][quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdrealtor]As for the lower scores I dont know the area as well as you but here is what I see many places. If there is alot of multi-family housing (i.e apartments like in UTC nearby) you draw a lower socio-economic demographic in. Do the kids who live in UTC attend UC high? If so that is probably what is going on.[/quote]
92121 multi-family about half UC and half LJ, slanting more to UC.[/quote]
When he says UTC I assume he means golden triangle, north of Rose Canyon. Most of that is 92122. And it’s almost entirely condos and apartment. Same zip as south UC – the part between 52 and Rose canyon. It all feeds to UC High.[/quote]
That’s what confused me, UCGal. 92122 (LJ Colony but also parts of UTC).
Yes, north of Rose Cyn … same zip as South UC. Sorry for the mixup, but both zips apply to multi-family. 92122 is northeast of the former Ardath Rd. annexation, is it not?
Thank you for the clarification.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.
