- This topic has 235 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 1, 2008 at 11:43 PM #147265February 2, 2008 at 1:43 AM #146952
djc
ParticipantStay in the higher paying job. Never downgrade your pay, at least voluntarily.
Other free advice:
Don’t get married, unless you have great luck with gambling. Women will tell you to disregard that advice, as they are the sole benefactors of marriage and the most likely divorce.
Use a dub, don’t get her pregnant.
February 2, 2008 at 1:43 AM #147196djc
ParticipantStay in the higher paying job. Never downgrade your pay, at least voluntarily.
Other free advice:
Don’t get married, unless you have great luck with gambling. Women will tell you to disregard that advice, as they are the sole benefactors of marriage and the most likely divorce.
Use a dub, don’t get her pregnant.
February 2, 2008 at 1:43 AM #147221djc
ParticipantStay in the higher paying job. Never downgrade your pay, at least voluntarily.
Other free advice:
Don’t get married, unless you have great luck with gambling. Women will tell you to disregard that advice, as they are the sole benefactors of marriage and the most likely divorce.
Use a dub, don’t get her pregnant.
February 2, 2008 at 1:43 AM #147232djc
ParticipantStay in the higher paying job. Never downgrade your pay, at least voluntarily.
Other free advice:
Don’t get married, unless you have great luck with gambling. Women will tell you to disregard that advice, as they are the sole benefactors of marriage and the most likely divorce.
Use a dub, don’t get her pregnant.
February 2, 2008 at 1:43 AM #147297djc
ParticipantStay in the higher paying job. Never downgrade your pay, at least voluntarily.
Other free advice:
Don’t get married, unless you have great luck with gambling. Women will tell you to disregard that advice, as they are the sole benefactors of marriage and the most likely divorce.
Use a dub, don’t get her pregnant.
February 2, 2008 at 5:23 AM #146957Anonymous
GuestHere’s a solution: Keep rocking as a sales rep and then negotiate your pay to include stock options. If you are a top sales guy they will not want to lose you and should give it to you. I know many sales reps who earned options as sales reps back in the 90s.
February 2, 2008 at 5:23 AM #147203Anonymous
GuestHere’s a solution: Keep rocking as a sales rep and then negotiate your pay to include stock options. If you are a top sales guy they will not want to lose you and should give it to you. I know many sales reps who earned options as sales reps back in the 90s.
February 2, 2008 at 5:23 AM #147227Anonymous
GuestHere’s a solution: Keep rocking as a sales rep and then negotiate your pay to include stock options. If you are a top sales guy they will not want to lose you and should give it to you. I know many sales reps who earned options as sales reps back in the 90s.
February 2, 2008 at 5:23 AM #147237Anonymous
GuestHere’s a solution: Keep rocking as a sales rep and then negotiate your pay to include stock options. If you are a top sales guy they will not want to lose you and should give it to you. I know many sales reps who earned options as sales reps back in the 90s.
February 2, 2008 at 5:23 AM #147302Anonymous
GuestHere’s a solution: Keep rocking as a sales rep and then negotiate your pay to include stock options. If you are a top sales guy they will not want to lose you and should give it to you. I know many sales reps who earned options as sales reps back in the 90s.
February 2, 2008 at 6:31 AM #146963Allan from Fallbrook
Participant4826: You hit the nail on the head. Back in my corporate days, I worked for a very large insurance broker. It was a production-driven culture, with the big producers the stars of the show. I was a CFO at the time, and even I knew where the line was when it came to pushing these guys.
The middle managers may have had the title, but no real power came with it. We had several downsizings following a merger, and the middle managers were the first to go. The sales force/producers were the first protected, and for good reason: They were the real reason behind the acquisition in the first place.
I don’t think what Casca/PD wrote is filth, by the way. Might be inaptly stated, but it certainly bears consideration, especially at your earning level, age and point in career. Given the statistics on marriage and divorce, you need to make provisions here as well.
February 2, 2008 at 6:31 AM #147208Allan from Fallbrook
Participant4826: You hit the nail on the head. Back in my corporate days, I worked for a very large insurance broker. It was a production-driven culture, with the big producers the stars of the show. I was a CFO at the time, and even I knew where the line was when it came to pushing these guys.
The middle managers may have had the title, but no real power came with it. We had several downsizings following a merger, and the middle managers were the first to go. The sales force/producers were the first protected, and for good reason: They were the real reason behind the acquisition in the first place.
I don’t think what Casca/PD wrote is filth, by the way. Might be inaptly stated, but it certainly bears consideration, especially at your earning level, age and point in career. Given the statistics on marriage and divorce, you need to make provisions here as well.
February 2, 2008 at 6:31 AM #147231Allan from Fallbrook
Participant4826: You hit the nail on the head. Back in my corporate days, I worked for a very large insurance broker. It was a production-driven culture, with the big producers the stars of the show. I was a CFO at the time, and even I knew where the line was when it came to pushing these guys.
The middle managers may have had the title, but no real power came with it. We had several downsizings following a merger, and the middle managers were the first to go. The sales force/producers were the first protected, and for good reason: They were the real reason behind the acquisition in the first place.
I don’t think what Casca/PD wrote is filth, by the way. Might be inaptly stated, but it certainly bears consideration, especially at your earning level, age and point in career. Given the statistics on marriage and divorce, you need to make provisions here as well.
February 2, 2008 at 6:31 AM #147241Allan from Fallbrook
Participant4826: You hit the nail on the head. Back in my corporate days, I worked for a very large insurance broker. It was a production-driven culture, with the big producers the stars of the show. I was a CFO at the time, and even I knew where the line was when it came to pushing these guys.
The middle managers may have had the title, but no real power came with it. We had several downsizings following a merger, and the middle managers were the first to go. The sales force/producers were the first protected, and for good reason: They were the real reason behind the acquisition in the first place.
I don’t think what Casca/PD wrote is filth, by the way. Might be inaptly stated, but it certainly bears consideration, especially at your earning level, age and point in career. Given the statistics on marriage and divorce, you need to make provisions here as well.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.