Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Businesses Taxed Too Much? Not Really…
- This topic has 140 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by
ucodegen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 23, 2011 at 7:27 PM #671501February 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM #670367
surveyor
ParticipantOh, gandalf, have we gotten to the name-calling already? It’s not even page 2! That just proves to me that you’ve lost the argument.
You put this article out there, without any real analytical thinking, and you parrot the inane and superficial conclusions of that article without any questioning and proceed to demonize a whole segment of the population.
I, and others, have proceeded to utterly destroy your arguments and because of that, I’m sad? Because I put up a rebuttal? And even more you accuse me of parroting a party line?
As I’ve said many times, you can accuse me of being any sort of things, but it doesn’t change the facts that I’ve put up.
And when you can’t argue that, all you have is name-calling.
February 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM #670429ParticipantOh, gandalf, have we gotten to the name-calling already? It’s not even page 2! That just proves to me that you’ve lost the argument.
You put this article out there, without any real analytical thinking, and you parrot the inane and superficial conclusions of that article without any questioning and proceed to demonize a whole segment of the population.
I, and others, have proceeded to utterly destroy your arguments and because of that, I’m sad? Because I put up a rebuttal? And even more you accuse me of parroting a party line?
As I’ve said many times, you can accuse me of being any sort of things, but it doesn’t change the facts that I’ve put up.
And when you can’t argue that, all you have is name-calling.
February 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM #671038ParticipantOh, gandalf, have we gotten to the name-calling already? It’s not even page 2! That just proves to me that you’ve lost the argument.
You put this article out there, without any real analytical thinking, and you parrot the inane and superficial conclusions of that article without any questioning and proceed to demonize a whole segment of the population.
I, and others, have proceeded to utterly destroy your arguments and because of that, I’m sad? Because I put up a rebuttal? And even more you accuse me of parroting a party line?
As I’ve said many times, you can accuse me of being any sort of things, but it doesn’t change the facts that I’ve put up.
And when you can’t argue that, all you have is name-calling.
February 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM #671178ParticipantOh, gandalf, have we gotten to the name-calling already? It’s not even page 2! That just proves to me that you’ve lost the argument.
You put this article out there, without any real analytical thinking, and you parrot the inane and superficial conclusions of that article without any questioning and proceed to demonize a whole segment of the population.
I, and others, have proceeded to utterly destroy your arguments and because of that, I’m sad? Because I put up a rebuttal? And even more you accuse me of parroting a party line?
As I’ve said many times, you can accuse me of being any sort of things, but it doesn’t change the facts that I’ve put up.
And when you can’t argue that, all you have is name-calling.
February 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM #671521ParticipantOh, gandalf, have we gotten to the name-calling already? It’s not even page 2! That just proves to me that you’ve lost the argument.
You put this article out there, without any real analytical thinking, and you parrot the inane and superficial conclusions of that article without any questioning and proceed to demonize a whole segment of the population.
I, and others, have proceeded to utterly destroy your arguments and because of that, I’m sad? Because I put up a rebuttal? And even more you accuse me of parroting a party line?
As I’ve said many times, you can accuse me of being any sort of things, but it doesn’t change the facts that I’ve put up.
And when you can’t argue that, all you have is name-calling.
February 23, 2011 at 8:08 PM #670377gandalf
Participanttl;dr…
February 23, 2011 at 8:08 PM #670439Participanttl;dr…
February 23, 2011 at 8:08 PM #671048Participanttl;dr…
February 23, 2011 at 8:08 PM #671188Participanttl;dr…
February 23, 2011 at 8:08 PM #671531Participanttl;dr…
February 23, 2011 at 9:56 PM #670412SK in CV
Participant[quote=surveyor]
I, and others, have proceeded to utterly destroy your arguments….[/quote]
No, you haven’t.
February 23, 2011 at 9:56 PM #670474Participant[quote=surveyor]
I, and others, have proceeded to utterly destroy your arguments….[/quote]
No, you haven’t.
February 23, 2011 at 9:56 PM #671083Participant[quote=surveyor]
I, and others, have proceeded to utterly destroy your arguments….[/quote]
No, you haven’t.
February 23, 2011 at 9:56 PM #671223Participant[quote=surveyor]
I, and others, have proceeded to utterly destroy your arguments….[/quote]
No, you haven’t.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
