Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Bush addresses the nation on the economy and the stock market tanks. Irony
- This topic has 162 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by
patientrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 11, 2007 at 12:17 AM #73314August 11, 2007 at 8:42 AM #73213
Raybyrnes
ParticipantCyphire
Short note to let you know that I enjoy your posts and insights. I think that they are generally on the mark. But here is a question? How would things have unfolded with a democrat at the reigns?
If Republicans have been so bad, why is it the the Democrats can’t run someone that can present a message as to why their party would be better for the American Public?
These questions are not slanted they are simply rhetorical.
August 11, 2007 at 8:42 AM #73335Raybyrnes
ParticipantCyphire
Short note to let you know that I enjoy your posts and insights. I think that they are generally on the mark. But here is a question? How would things have unfolded with a democrat at the reigns?
If Republicans have been so bad, why is it the the Democrats can’t run someone that can present a message as to why their party would be better for the American Public?
These questions are not slanted they are simply rhetorical.
August 11, 2007 at 8:42 AM #73343Raybyrnes
ParticipantCyphire
Short note to let you know that I enjoy your posts and insights. I think that they are generally on the mark. But here is a question? How would things have unfolded with a democrat at the reigns?
If Republicans have been so bad, why is it the the Democrats can’t run someone that can present a message as to why their party would be better for the American Public?
These questions are not slanted they are simply rhetorical.
August 11, 2007 at 9:45 AM #73256PerryChase
ParticipantBecause progressive liberals are more intellectually honest and they aren’t as good at maligning the other side as unpatriotic and weak (on crime, immigrants, terrorists).
Why do families go back to the church were their children were molested? Why do poor whites in Red States vote to lower the capital gains tax (if they even know what that is)?
——-
Al Gore would not have gone to war in Iraq. Thousand of Americans and hundred of thousand of Iraqi would be alive today.
America would have higher mileage cars and Ford would not be near bankruptcy.
We would have an alternative energy industry that would provide some good paying jobs and exports for America.
We would still have the surplus carried over from the Clinton years, no war debt and we wouldn’t have to borrow from the Chinese or the Saudis.
Just a few important things.
August 11, 2007 at 9:45 AM #73375PerryChase
ParticipantBecause progressive liberals are more intellectually honest and they aren’t as good at maligning the other side as unpatriotic and weak (on crime, immigrants, terrorists).
Why do families go back to the church were their children were molested? Why do poor whites in Red States vote to lower the capital gains tax (if they even know what that is)?
——-
Al Gore would not have gone to war in Iraq. Thousand of Americans and hundred of thousand of Iraqi would be alive today.
America would have higher mileage cars and Ford would not be near bankruptcy.
We would have an alternative energy industry that would provide some good paying jobs and exports for America.
We would still have the surplus carried over from the Clinton years, no war debt and we wouldn’t have to borrow from the Chinese or the Saudis.
Just a few important things.
August 11, 2007 at 9:45 AM #73381PerryChase
ParticipantBecause progressive liberals are more intellectually honest and they aren’t as good at maligning the other side as unpatriotic and weak (on crime, immigrants, terrorists).
Why do families go back to the church were their children were molested? Why do poor whites in Red States vote to lower the capital gains tax (if they even know what that is)?
——-
Al Gore would not have gone to war in Iraq. Thousand of Americans and hundred of thousand of Iraqi would be alive today.
America would have higher mileage cars and Ford would not be near bankruptcy.
We would have an alternative energy industry that would provide some good paying jobs and exports for America.
We would still have the surplus carried over from the Clinton years, no war debt and we wouldn’t have to borrow from the Chinese or the Saudis.
Just a few important things.
August 11, 2007 at 10:04 AM #73259drunkle
Participant“Al Gore would not have gone to war in Iraq. Thousand of Americans and hundred of thousand of Iraqi would be alive today. ”
probably true.
“America would have higher mileage cars and Ford would not be near bankruptcy. ”
probably not true. rep controlled congress at the time, dem take over unlikely if gore were pres.
“We would have an alternative energy industry that would provide some good paying jobs and exports for America. ”
ditto
“We would still have the surplus carried over from the Clinton years, no war debt and we wouldn’t have to borrow from the Chinese or the Saudis. ”
possible, but the dot bomb, was putting a squeeze on the economy at the time…
bottom line, however, when asked “what/who are the alternatives”, i think we’re seeing that *anyone* would have been better than bush. even the corvair guy, what’s his name…
edit: there’s a john stewart bit regarding cape wind and fat kennedy… nimby politics on off shore wind power…
August 11, 2007 at 10:04 AM #73379drunkle
Participant“Al Gore would not have gone to war in Iraq. Thousand of Americans and hundred of thousand of Iraqi would be alive today. ”
probably true.
“America would have higher mileage cars and Ford would not be near bankruptcy. ”
probably not true. rep controlled congress at the time, dem take over unlikely if gore were pres.
“We would have an alternative energy industry that would provide some good paying jobs and exports for America. ”
ditto
“We would still have the surplus carried over from the Clinton years, no war debt and we wouldn’t have to borrow from the Chinese or the Saudis. ”
possible, but the dot bomb, was putting a squeeze on the economy at the time…
bottom line, however, when asked “what/who are the alternatives”, i think we’re seeing that *anyone* would have been better than bush. even the corvair guy, what’s his name…
edit: there’s a john stewart bit regarding cape wind and fat kennedy… nimby politics on off shore wind power…
August 11, 2007 at 10:04 AM #73384drunkle
Participant“Al Gore would not have gone to war in Iraq. Thousand of Americans and hundred of thousand of Iraqi would be alive today. ”
probably true.
“America would have higher mileage cars and Ford would not be near bankruptcy. ”
probably not true. rep controlled congress at the time, dem take over unlikely if gore were pres.
“We would have an alternative energy industry that would provide some good paying jobs and exports for America. ”
ditto
“We would still have the surplus carried over from the Clinton years, no war debt and we wouldn’t have to borrow from the Chinese or the Saudis. ”
possible, but the dot bomb, was putting a squeeze on the economy at the time…
bottom line, however, when asked “what/who are the alternatives”, i think we’re seeing that *anyone* would have been better than bush. even the corvair guy, what’s his name…
edit: there’s a john stewart bit regarding cape wind and fat kennedy… nimby politics on off shore wind power…
August 11, 2007 at 10:25 AM #73268Arraya
ParticipantCyphire your question does not make sense there is no connection between how bad the Bush administation is and the Dems lack of ability to succesfully market a president to the ameican people.
That’s like saying because McDonalds sells the most food in the world therefor it is the best….
August 11, 2007 at 10:25 AM #73388Arraya
ParticipantCyphire your question does not make sense there is no connection between how bad the Bush administation is and the Dems lack of ability to succesfully market a president to the ameican people.
That’s like saying because McDonalds sells the most food in the world therefor it is the best….
August 11, 2007 at 10:25 AM #73393Arraya
ParticipantCyphire your question does not make sense there is no connection between how bad the Bush administation is and the Dems lack of ability to succesfully market a president to the ameican people.
That’s like saying because McDonalds sells the most food in the world therefor it is the best….
August 11, 2007 at 11:42 AM #73292sdnativeson
ParticipantClinton, Al Gore… I am no fan of G. Bush but the sycophantic attitude some people here have of those two.. well… Baaaaa Baaaaa! Political bigotry abounds here and as bigotry supposedly is largely based upon ignorance – connect the dots.
Any individual that is politically polarized is not, imho, intelligent much less any type of free-thinker.
fourplexowner made a comment how he associates a movie with current events.
The movie I associate with this thread is the movie “Being There”.
August 11, 2007 at 11:42 AM #73411sdnativeson
ParticipantClinton, Al Gore… I am no fan of G. Bush but the sycophantic attitude some people here have of those two.. well… Baaaaa Baaaaa! Political bigotry abounds here and as bigotry supposedly is largely based upon ignorance – connect the dots.
Any individual that is politically polarized is not, imho, intelligent much less any type of free-thinker.
fourplexowner made a comment how he associates a movie with current events.
The movie I associate with this thread is the movie “Being There”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.