Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Bush addresses the nation on the economy and the stock market tanks. Irony
- This topic has 162 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by patientrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 11, 2007 at 5:00 PM #73576August 11, 2007 at 7:15 PM #73473sdnativesonParticipant
I concur with your first two paragraphs, I would just toss in “Democrat” right alongside Republican verbatim.
I think Clinton was a pretty benign president overall. My biggest gripe is that he looked directly into the camera and lied to the public, when he didn’t have to {please spare me any bush does that everyday or some crap if you don’t know what I mean by what I said, just say that).Interesting point, you might want to see where a good percentage of the money that Bill has earned after leaving office has come from, I’ll leave it at that before I get labeled
The laughingstock of every civilized and uncivilized country? Generalization, I spend a good portion of the year traveling overseas and I wouldn’t use that term – when Clinton was being investigated we were, those who were aware of it couldn’t understand why it was made such a big deal(like alot of people here). Now I didn’t say that everywhere I go I am met with open arms but, I would say beyond the authorities, most – I said most really don’t care.
We are still dangerous, very dangerous for a myriad of reasons. A sample, a conversation with an aquaintance – he commented (paraphrasing)it’s difficult to understand you americans, you elect Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton and another Bush – you change your politics like my daughter changes her clothes, I don’t know what I am going to see next. (not exactly subtle with the insult but not completelyl inaccurate either)
If you want GW to “abdicate” then to be both honest and fair you gotta ask the same of congress don’t you?
Anyway having said that I don’t express my opinions to try to change anyones mind, it’s a dialogue right? I do try to make people think outside their comfort zone. to me being polarized is to be intellectually dead
August 11, 2007 at 7:15 PM #73594sdnativesonParticipantI concur with your first two paragraphs, I would just toss in “Democrat” right alongside Republican verbatim.
I think Clinton was a pretty benign president overall. My biggest gripe is that he looked directly into the camera and lied to the public, when he didn’t have to {please spare me any bush does that everyday or some crap if you don’t know what I mean by what I said, just say that).Interesting point, you might want to see where a good percentage of the money that Bill has earned after leaving office has come from, I’ll leave it at that before I get labeled
The laughingstock of every civilized and uncivilized country? Generalization, I spend a good portion of the year traveling overseas and I wouldn’t use that term – when Clinton was being investigated we were, those who were aware of it couldn’t understand why it was made such a big deal(like alot of people here). Now I didn’t say that everywhere I go I am met with open arms but, I would say beyond the authorities, most – I said most really don’t care.
We are still dangerous, very dangerous for a myriad of reasons. A sample, a conversation with an aquaintance – he commented (paraphrasing)it’s difficult to understand you americans, you elect Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton and another Bush – you change your politics like my daughter changes her clothes, I don’t know what I am going to see next. (not exactly subtle with the insult but not completelyl inaccurate either)
If you want GW to “abdicate” then to be both honest and fair you gotta ask the same of congress don’t you?
Anyway having said that I don’t express my opinions to try to change anyones mind, it’s a dialogue right? I do try to make people think outside their comfort zone. to me being polarized is to be intellectually dead
August 11, 2007 at 7:15 PM #73599sdnativesonParticipantI concur with your first two paragraphs, I would just toss in “Democrat” right alongside Republican verbatim.
I think Clinton was a pretty benign president overall. My biggest gripe is that he looked directly into the camera and lied to the public, when he didn’t have to {please spare me any bush does that everyday or some crap if you don’t know what I mean by what I said, just say that).Interesting point, you might want to see where a good percentage of the money that Bill has earned after leaving office has come from, I’ll leave it at that before I get labeled
The laughingstock of every civilized and uncivilized country? Generalization, I spend a good portion of the year traveling overseas and I wouldn’t use that term – when Clinton was being investigated we were, those who were aware of it couldn’t understand why it was made such a big deal(like alot of people here). Now I didn’t say that everywhere I go I am met with open arms but, I would say beyond the authorities, most – I said most really don’t care.
We are still dangerous, very dangerous for a myriad of reasons. A sample, a conversation with an aquaintance – he commented (paraphrasing)it’s difficult to understand you americans, you elect Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton and another Bush – you change your politics like my daughter changes her clothes, I don’t know what I am going to see next. (not exactly subtle with the insult but not completelyl inaccurate either)
If you want GW to “abdicate” then to be both honest and fair you gotta ask the same of congress don’t you?
Anyway having said that I don’t express my opinions to try to change anyones mind, it’s a dialogue right? I do try to make people think outside their comfort zone. to me being polarized is to be intellectually dead
August 11, 2007 at 9:05 PM #73500RaybyrnesParticipantsdnativeson
Seems as though you are challenging people to think critically and people are jumping on your back for doing so.
Here is maybe a different question for the board? When is the last time you considered voting for someone from the other party. Seems to me that people go into the voting booths these day and will vote Dem or Republican across the board without knowing anything about the conadidate or in many cases the issues. Ask the average Democratic voter what public policies Dems stand for and they are unable to communicate basic policies. The same holds true for Republicans. The most common response is becasue mI think there better. “Well help me understand whay? ” and there is silence.
I sort of like the fact that Hilary and Obama are in the race because I routinely here people say they will vote for these candidates because of their sex or race. Seems as ignorant ans voting for a president becaseu of his party line.
Last itme I looked Clintons economics during his second term were very Republican in tone. I know house and Senate were republican so he was limited. Yada Yada Yada
August 11, 2007 at 9:05 PM #73621RaybyrnesParticipantsdnativeson
Seems as though you are challenging people to think critically and people are jumping on your back for doing so.
Here is maybe a different question for the board? When is the last time you considered voting for someone from the other party. Seems to me that people go into the voting booths these day and will vote Dem or Republican across the board without knowing anything about the conadidate or in many cases the issues. Ask the average Democratic voter what public policies Dems stand for and they are unable to communicate basic policies. The same holds true for Republicans. The most common response is becasue mI think there better. “Well help me understand whay? ” and there is silence.
I sort of like the fact that Hilary and Obama are in the race because I routinely here people say they will vote for these candidates because of their sex or race. Seems as ignorant ans voting for a president becaseu of his party line.
Last itme I looked Clintons economics during his second term were very Republican in tone. I know house and Senate were republican so he was limited. Yada Yada Yada
August 11, 2007 at 9:05 PM #73627RaybyrnesParticipantsdnativeson
Seems as though you are challenging people to think critically and people are jumping on your back for doing so.
Here is maybe a different question for the board? When is the last time you considered voting for someone from the other party. Seems to me that people go into the voting booths these day and will vote Dem or Republican across the board without knowing anything about the conadidate or in many cases the issues. Ask the average Democratic voter what public policies Dems stand for and they are unable to communicate basic policies. The same holds true for Republicans. The most common response is becasue mI think there better. “Well help me understand whay? ” and there is silence.
I sort of like the fact that Hilary and Obama are in the race because I routinely here people say they will vote for these candidates because of their sex or race. Seems as ignorant ans voting for a president becaseu of his party line.
Last itme I looked Clintons economics during his second term were very Republican in tone. I know house and Senate were republican so he was limited. Yada Yada Yada
August 11, 2007 at 11:08 PM #73558sdnativesonParticipantI can remember when it was expected of a person.
Good question and exercise Raybyrnes. And your observation
imho seems dead accurate.This is the mentality/mindset that is actively promoted in our society (I can’t help but think of the visa check card commercial with everyone on autopilot until some “person” pulls out cash).
So much for individuality or free-will we are being weighed, measured, packaged, labeled and delivered as promised. Time to stop, this isn’t the medium for a topic like that.
August 11, 2007 at 11:08 PM #73679sdnativesonParticipantI can remember when it was expected of a person.
Good question and exercise Raybyrnes. And your observation
imho seems dead accurate.This is the mentality/mindset that is actively promoted in our society (I can’t help but think of the visa check card commercial with everyone on autopilot until some “person” pulls out cash).
So much for individuality or free-will we are being weighed, measured, packaged, labeled and delivered as promised. Time to stop, this isn’t the medium for a topic like that.
August 11, 2007 at 11:08 PM #73683sdnativesonParticipantI can remember when it was expected of a person.
Good question and exercise Raybyrnes. And your observation
imho seems dead accurate.This is the mentality/mindset that is actively promoted in our society (I can’t help but think of the visa check card commercial with everyone on autopilot until some “person” pulls out cash).
So much for individuality or free-will we are being weighed, measured, packaged, labeled and delivered as promised. Time to stop, this isn’t the medium for a topic like that.
August 12, 2007 at 9:20 AM #73638CostaMesaParticipantMuggle – One more brick in the big picture wall. Thanks for the contribution.
August 12, 2007 at 9:20 AM #73759CostaMesaParticipantMuggle – One more brick in the big picture wall. Thanks for the contribution.
August 12, 2007 at 9:20 AM #73765CostaMesaParticipantMuggle – One more brick in the big picture wall. Thanks for the contribution.
August 12, 2007 at 11:49 AM #73732drunkleParticipanti dont get it. a guy labels another as naive for thinking the president can truly affect the economy, the guy resorts to Argument by Definition in order to vainly support his ideology… and then turns around demanding critical thought from others… how does that work?
just… wow.
August 12, 2007 at 11:49 AM #73852drunkleParticipanti dont get it. a guy labels another as naive for thinking the president can truly affect the economy, the guy resorts to Argument by Definition in order to vainly support his ideology… and then turns around demanding critical thought from others… how does that work?
just… wow.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.