Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Bubble bust and changing landscape
- This topic has 255 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 29, 2008 at 10:17 AM #277359September 29, 2008 at 11:34 AM #277133EugeneParticipant
Where have you seen RB not having a lot of foreclosures when 4s, Del sur and Santaluz are considered RB West and has REOs/SSs/Fore’s everywhere?
There are some foreclosures everywhere. But the ratio of REOs to houses in RB and 4S is a lot lower than south of the 8. “Everywhere” is an exagerration. I see 28 single-family REOs in all of RB (92127). SANDAG estimates 7755 houses in the zip code. One in 275 is bank-owned. In National City, the ratio is 1 in 64.
Not having foreclosures is not a defining feature of the top tier. Desirability is.
I’m not very familiar with Golden Hill, I’m just using it as an example. There’s this 3-bedroom house listed for 124k west of 805, is it Golden Hill?
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/3268-Mclarens-92102/home/5857745
September 29, 2008 at 11:34 AM #277392EugeneParticipantWhere have you seen RB not having a lot of foreclosures when 4s, Del sur and Santaluz are considered RB West and has REOs/SSs/Fore’s everywhere?
There are some foreclosures everywhere. But the ratio of REOs to houses in RB and 4S is a lot lower than south of the 8. “Everywhere” is an exagerration. I see 28 single-family REOs in all of RB (92127). SANDAG estimates 7755 houses in the zip code. One in 275 is bank-owned. In National City, the ratio is 1 in 64.
Not having foreclosures is not a defining feature of the top tier. Desirability is.
I’m not very familiar with Golden Hill, I’m just using it as an example. There’s this 3-bedroom house listed for 124k west of 805, is it Golden Hill?
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/3268-Mclarens-92102/home/5857745
September 29, 2008 at 11:34 AM #277407EugeneParticipantWhere have you seen RB not having a lot of foreclosures when 4s, Del sur and Santaluz are considered RB West and has REOs/SSs/Fore’s everywhere?
There are some foreclosures everywhere. But the ratio of REOs to houses in RB and 4S is a lot lower than south of the 8. “Everywhere” is an exagerration. I see 28 single-family REOs in all of RB (92127). SANDAG estimates 7755 houses in the zip code. One in 275 is bank-owned. In National City, the ratio is 1 in 64.
Not having foreclosures is not a defining feature of the top tier. Desirability is.
I’m not very familiar with Golden Hill, I’m just using it as an example. There’s this 3-bedroom house listed for 124k west of 805, is it Golden Hill?
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/3268-Mclarens-92102/home/5857745
September 29, 2008 at 11:34 AM #277441EugeneParticipantWhere have you seen RB not having a lot of foreclosures when 4s, Del sur and Santaluz are considered RB West and has REOs/SSs/Fore’s everywhere?
There are some foreclosures everywhere. But the ratio of REOs to houses in RB and 4S is a lot lower than south of the 8. “Everywhere” is an exagerration. I see 28 single-family REOs in all of RB (92127). SANDAG estimates 7755 houses in the zip code. One in 275 is bank-owned. In National City, the ratio is 1 in 64.
Not having foreclosures is not a defining feature of the top tier. Desirability is.
I’m not very familiar with Golden Hill, I’m just using it as an example. There’s this 3-bedroom house listed for 124k west of 805, is it Golden Hill?
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/3268-Mclarens-92102/home/5857745
September 29, 2008 at 11:34 AM #277455EugeneParticipantWhere have you seen RB not having a lot of foreclosures when 4s, Del sur and Santaluz are considered RB West and has REOs/SSs/Fore’s everywhere?
There are some foreclosures everywhere. But the ratio of REOs to houses in RB and 4S is a lot lower than south of the 8. “Everywhere” is an exagerration. I see 28 single-family REOs in all of RB (92127). SANDAG estimates 7755 houses in the zip code. One in 275 is bank-owned. In National City, the ratio is 1 in 64.
Not having foreclosures is not a defining feature of the top tier. Desirability is.
I’m not very familiar with Golden Hill, I’m just using it as an example. There’s this 3-bedroom house listed for 124k west of 805, is it Golden Hill?
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/3268-Mclarens-92102/home/5857745
September 29, 2008 at 12:28 PM #277216TavoParticipantFo someone not being familiar with Golden Hill, you certainly make assertions like you know it well.
“Now the interesting one is the low tier. Places like Golden Hill….No one really likes those. I think that people live there just because they happen to own a house (maybe they’ve inherited it…)”.
by the way, I would say your redfin example is in Logan Heights. True, same zip code, but pretty different market. Maybe you should visit Golden Hill sometime, it is pretty charming and very convenient to all of SD. Maybe not for you, though…
September 29, 2008 at 12:28 PM #277477TavoParticipantFo someone not being familiar with Golden Hill, you certainly make assertions like you know it well.
“Now the interesting one is the low tier. Places like Golden Hill….No one really likes those. I think that people live there just because they happen to own a house (maybe they’ve inherited it…)”.
by the way, I would say your redfin example is in Logan Heights. True, same zip code, but pretty different market. Maybe you should visit Golden Hill sometime, it is pretty charming and very convenient to all of SD. Maybe not for you, though…
September 29, 2008 at 12:28 PM #277490TavoParticipantFo someone not being familiar with Golden Hill, you certainly make assertions like you know it well.
“Now the interesting one is the low tier. Places like Golden Hill….No one really likes those. I think that people live there just because they happen to own a house (maybe they’ve inherited it…)”.
by the way, I would say your redfin example is in Logan Heights. True, same zip code, but pretty different market. Maybe you should visit Golden Hill sometime, it is pretty charming and very convenient to all of SD. Maybe not for you, though…
September 29, 2008 at 12:28 PM #277526TavoParticipantFo someone not being familiar with Golden Hill, you certainly make assertions like you know it well.
“Now the interesting one is the low tier. Places like Golden Hill….No one really likes those. I think that people live there just because they happen to own a house (maybe they’ve inherited it…)”.
by the way, I would say your redfin example is in Logan Heights. True, same zip code, but pretty different market. Maybe you should visit Golden Hill sometime, it is pretty charming and very convenient to all of SD. Maybe not for you, though…
September 29, 2008 at 12:28 PM #277539TavoParticipantFo someone not being familiar with Golden Hill, you certainly make assertions like you know it well.
“Now the interesting one is the low tier. Places like Golden Hill….No one really likes those. I think that people live there just because they happen to own a house (maybe they’ve inherited it…)”.
by the way, I would say your redfin example is in Logan Heights. True, same zip code, but pretty different market. Maybe you should visit Golden Hill sometime, it is pretty charming and very convenient to all of SD. Maybe not for you, though…
September 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM #277221EugeneParticipantI’m more familiar with Encanto. Let’s substitute Encanto for all occurrences of “Golden Hill” in this thread.
September 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM #277482EugeneParticipantI’m more familiar with Encanto. Let’s substitute Encanto for all occurrences of “Golden Hill” in this thread.
September 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM #277495EugeneParticipantI’m more familiar with Encanto. Let’s substitute Encanto for all occurrences of “Golden Hill” in this thread.
September 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM #277531EugeneParticipantI’m more familiar with Encanto. Let’s substitute Encanto for all occurrences of “Golden Hill” in this thread.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.