- This topic has 405 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by
jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 20, 2010 at 2:45 PM #568776June 21, 2010 at 1:47 PM #568338
Veritas
Participant“To the right and the center, the oil spill is a management issue, indicative of Obama’s lack of administrative experience. Community organizers and law professors don’t know how to handle oil spills. But to the left, it is an environmental issue pure and simple. Each barrel of oil that flows into the Gulf is a sin against nature and alienates those for whom environment is the key issue. And Obama can ill afford to lose them. So Obama is stuck, drowning in oil with no relief in sight.”
By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
June 21, 2010 at 1:47 PM #568432Participant“To the right and the center, the oil spill is a management issue, indicative of Obama’s lack of administrative experience. Community organizers and law professors don’t know how to handle oil spills. But to the left, it is an environmental issue pure and simple. Each barrel of oil that flows into the Gulf is a sin against nature and alienates those for whom environment is the key issue. And Obama can ill afford to lose them. So Obama is stuck, drowning in oil with no relief in sight.”
By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
June 21, 2010 at 1:47 PM #568937Participant“To the right and the center, the oil spill is a management issue, indicative of Obama’s lack of administrative experience. Community organizers and law professors don’t know how to handle oil spills. But to the left, it is an environmental issue pure and simple. Each barrel of oil that flows into the Gulf is a sin against nature and alienates those for whom environment is the key issue. And Obama can ill afford to lose them. So Obama is stuck, drowning in oil with no relief in sight.”
By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
June 21, 2010 at 1:47 PM #569044Participant“To the right and the center, the oil spill is a management issue, indicative of Obama’s lack of administrative experience. Community organizers and law professors don’t know how to handle oil spills. But to the left, it is an environmental issue pure and simple. Each barrel of oil that flows into the Gulf is a sin against nature and alienates those for whom environment is the key issue. And Obama can ill afford to lose them. So Obama is stuck, drowning in oil with no relief in sight.”
By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
June 21, 2010 at 1:47 PM #569329Participant“To the right and the center, the oil spill is a management issue, indicative of Obama’s lack of administrative experience. Community organizers and law professors don’t know how to handle oil spills. But to the left, it is an environmental issue pure and simple. Each barrel of oil that flows into the Gulf is a sin against nature and alienates those for whom environment is the key issue. And Obama can ill afford to lose them. So Obama is stuck, drowning in oil with no relief in sight.”
By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
June 21, 2010 at 2:07 PM #568362partypup
Participant[quote=KSMountain][quote=partypup]I will bet anyone on this forum $100 (payable via PayPal) that the relief well(s) will NOT work, and another $50 that the end game for this fiasco is nuclear. Any takers?
[/quote]
I will take both bets partypup. Where do we go from here?[/quote]The next steps are simple:
1. The relief wells should be completed, if we are to believe this administration, around the end of August. If they are successful and succeed in containing the wellhead, I owe you $100. If they aren’t, you owe me $100.
2. The nuclear option will then be *contemplated* seriously once the relief wells are demonstrated to be a failure. If we pursue the nuke option, you owe me $50, separate and apart from any monies paid in (1) above. If the nuke option is not put on the table, then I owe you $50, separate and apart from any monies paid in (1) above.
Please PM me with your email address, and I will respond with my email address. Please make certain that the email address you send me is associated with a valid PayPal account from which you intend to make payment. Thanks, KS.
June 21, 2010 at 2:07 PM #568457Participant[quote=KSMountain][quote=partypup]I will bet anyone on this forum $100 (payable via PayPal) that the relief well(s) will NOT work, and another $50 that the end game for this fiasco is nuclear. Any takers?
[/quote]
I will take both bets partypup. Where do we go from here?[/quote]The next steps are simple:
1. The relief wells should be completed, if we are to believe this administration, around the end of August. If they are successful and succeed in containing the wellhead, I owe you $100. If they aren’t, you owe me $100.
2. The nuclear option will then be *contemplated* seriously once the relief wells are demonstrated to be a failure. If we pursue the nuke option, you owe me $50, separate and apart from any monies paid in (1) above. If the nuke option is not put on the table, then I owe you $50, separate and apart from any monies paid in (1) above.
Please PM me with your email address, and I will respond with my email address. Please make certain that the email address you send me is associated with a valid PayPal account from which you intend to make payment. Thanks, KS.
June 21, 2010 at 2:07 PM #568962Participant[quote=KSMountain][quote=partypup]I will bet anyone on this forum $100 (payable via PayPal) that the relief well(s) will NOT work, and another $50 that the end game for this fiasco is nuclear. Any takers?
[/quote]
I will take both bets partypup. Where do we go from here?[/quote]The next steps are simple:
1. The relief wells should be completed, if we are to believe this administration, around the end of August. If they are successful and succeed in containing the wellhead, I owe you $100. If they aren’t, you owe me $100.
2. The nuclear option will then be *contemplated* seriously once the relief wells are demonstrated to be a failure. If we pursue the nuke option, you owe me $50, separate and apart from any monies paid in (1) above. If the nuke option is not put on the table, then I owe you $50, separate and apart from any monies paid in (1) above.
Please PM me with your email address, and I will respond with my email address. Please make certain that the email address you send me is associated with a valid PayPal account from which you intend to make payment. Thanks, KS.
June 21, 2010 at 2:07 PM #569069Participant[quote=KSMountain][quote=partypup]I will bet anyone on this forum $100 (payable via PayPal) that the relief well(s) will NOT work, and another $50 that the end game for this fiasco is nuclear. Any takers?
[/quote]
I will take both bets partypup. Where do we go from here?[/quote]The next steps are simple:
1. The relief wells should be completed, if we are to believe this administration, around the end of August. If they are successful and succeed in containing the wellhead, I owe you $100. If they aren’t, you owe me $100.
2. The nuclear option will then be *contemplated* seriously once the relief wells are demonstrated to be a failure. If we pursue the nuke option, you owe me $50, separate and apart from any monies paid in (1) above. If the nuke option is not put on the table, then I owe you $50, separate and apart from any monies paid in (1) above.
Please PM me with your email address, and I will respond with my email address. Please make certain that the email address you send me is associated with a valid PayPal account from which you intend to make payment. Thanks, KS.
June 21, 2010 at 2:07 PM #569353Participant[quote=KSMountain][quote=partypup]I will bet anyone on this forum $100 (payable via PayPal) that the relief well(s) will NOT work, and another $50 that the end game for this fiasco is nuclear. Any takers?
[/quote]
I will take both bets partypup. Where do we go from here?[/quote]The next steps are simple:
1. The relief wells should be completed, if we are to believe this administration, around the end of August. If they are successful and succeed in containing the wellhead, I owe you $100. If they aren’t, you owe me $100.
2. The nuclear option will then be *contemplated* seriously once the relief wells are demonstrated to be a failure. If we pursue the nuke option, you owe me $50, separate and apart from any monies paid in (1) above. If the nuke option is not put on the table, then I owe you $50, separate and apart from any monies paid in (1) above.
Please PM me with your email address, and I will respond with my email address. Please make certain that the email address you send me is associated with a valid PayPal account from which you intend to make payment. Thanks, KS.
June 21, 2010 at 2:11 PM #568375Zeitgeist
ParticipantMaybe Rich can hold the money.
I bet Partypup wins, but I am sure it will be some kind of surgical nuke (if there is such a thing). That should make the noise from the left equal to the nuke we used on Japan. These truly are troubling times. Using a nuke there should set off some more earthquakes….
June 21, 2010 at 2:11 PM #568472ParticipantMaybe Rich can hold the money.
I bet Partypup wins, but I am sure it will be some kind of surgical nuke (if there is such a thing). That should make the noise from the left equal to the nuke we used on Japan. These truly are troubling times. Using a nuke there should set off some more earthquakes….
June 21, 2010 at 2:11 PM #568977ParticipantMaybe Rich can hold the money.
I bet Partypup wins, but I am sure it will be some kind of surgical nuke (if there is such a thing). That should make the noise from the left equal to the nuke we used on Japan. These truly are troubling times. Using a nuke there should set off some more earthquakes….
June 21, 2010 at 2:11 PM #569084ParticipantMaybe Rich can hold the money.
I bet Partypup wins, but I am sure it will be some kind of surgical nuke (if there is such a thing). That should make the noise from the left equal to the nuke we used on Japan. These truly are troubling times. Using a nuke there should set off some more earthquakes….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.