- This topic has 205 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 12 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM #454426September 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM #453663
sdgrrl
Participant[quote=CONCHO]
Actually Scots are British subjects. Scottish people are not English, but they are British. Great Britain comprises England, Wales and Scotland; the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland adds Northern Ireland as well. UK citizens can properly be called “British” as well as “English”, “Scottish”, “Welsh”, or “Irish”, depending on their heritage. This is similar to how a Texan is also an American.
Northern Ireland[/quote
Thanks Concho- I learned something new today. I knew Scots and others were not “English” but I didn’t realize or just never thought about that they are united as British, hence the British Isles. Thanks!
September 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM #453858Participant[quote=CONCHO]
Actually Scots are British subjects. Scottish people are not English, but they are British. Great Britain comprises England, Wales and Scotland; the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland adds Northern Ireland as well. UK citizens can properly be called “British” as well as “English”, “Scottish”, “Welsh”, or “Irish”, depending on their heritage. This is similar to how a Texan is also an American.
Northern Ireland[/quote
Thanks Concho- I learned something new today. I knew Scots and others were not “English” but I didn’t realize or just never thought about that they are united as British, hence the British Isles. Thanks!
September 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM #454197Participant[quote=CONCHO]
Actually Scots are British subjects. Scottish people are not English, but they are British. Great Britain comprises England, Wales and Scotland; the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland adds Northern Ireland as well. UK citizens can properly be called “British” as well as “English”, “Scottish”, “Welsh”, or “Irish”, depending on their heritage. This is similar to how a Texan is also an American.
Northern Ireland[/quote
Thanks Concho- I learned something new today. I knew Scots and others were not “English” but I didn’t realize or just never thought about that they are united as British, hence the British Isles. Thanks!
September 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM #454268Participant[quote=CONCHO]
Actually Scots are British subjects. Scottish people are not English, but they are British. Great Britain comprises England, Wales and Scotland; the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland adds Northern Ireland as well. UK citizens can properly be called “British” as well as “English”, “Scottish”, “Welsh”, or “Irish”, depending on their heritage. This is similar to how a Texan is also an American.
Northern Ireland[/quote
Thanks Concho- I learned something new today. I knew Scots and others were not “English” but I didn’t realize or just never thought about that they are united as British, hence the British Isles. Thanks!
September 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM #454461Participant[quote=CONCHO]
Actually Scots are British subjects. Scottish people are not English, but they are British. Great Britain comprises England, Wales and Scotland; the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland adds Northern Ireland as well. UK citizens can properly be called “British” as well as “English”, “Scottish”, “Welsh”, or “Irish”, depending on their heritage. This is similar to how a Texan is also an American.
Northern Ireland[/quote
Thanks Concho- I learned something new today. I knew Scots and others were not “English” but I didn’t realize or just never thought about that they are united as British, hence the British Isles. Thanks!
September 7, 2009 at 9:15 PM #454045Arraya
ParticipantCONCHO-Somebody did hijack Allan’s handle. The Allan I know, knows there is overwhelming, were talking volumes and volumes of evidence linking Iraq to oil. He know’s this because he has read a my posts over the past few years.
The Allan I know, would not resort to partisan knee jerk respones.
The funny thing is, Bushco completely failed at their conspiracy. The “Blood for oil” empire is breaking up.
Obama resides over it’s dissolution.
September 7, 2009 at 9:15 PM #454240ParticipantCONCHO-Somebody did hijack Allan’s handle. The Allan I know, knows there is overwhelming, were talking volumes and volumes of evidence linking Iraq to oil. He know’s this because he has read a my posts over the past few years.
The Allan I know, would not resort to partisan knee jerk respones.
The funny thing is, Bushco completely failed at their conspiracy. The “Blood for oil” empire is breaking up.
Obama resides over it’s dissolution.
September 7, 2009 at 9:15 PM #454580ParticipantCONCHO-Somebody did hijack Allan’s handle. The Allan I know, knows there is overwhelming, were talking volumes and volumes of evidence linking Iraq to oil. He know’s this because he has read a my posts over the past few years.
The Allan I know, would not resort to partisan knee jerk respones.
The funny thing is, Bushco completely failed at their conspiracy. The “Blood for oil” empire is breaking up.
Obama resides over it’s dissolution.
September 7, 2009 at 9:15 PM #454652ParticipantCONCHO-Somebody did hijack Allan’s handle. The Allan I know, knows there is overwhelming, were talking volumes and volumes of evidence linking Iraq to oil. He know’s this because he has read a my posts over the past few years.
The Allan I know, would not resort to partisan knee jerk respones.
The funny thing is, Bushco completely failed at their conspiracy. The “Blood for oil” empire is breaking up.
Obama resides over it’s dissolution.
September 7, 2009 at 9:15 PM #454844ParticipantCONCHO-Somebody did hijack Allan’s handle. The Allan I know, knows there is overwhelming, were talking volumes and volumes of evidence linking Iraq to oil. He know’s this because he has read a my posts over the past few years.
The Allan I know, would not resort to partisan knee jerk respones.
The funny thing is, Bushco completely failed at their conspiracy. The “Blood for oil” empire is breaking up.
Obama resides over it’s dissolution.
September 7, 2009 at 9:50 PM #454055Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=Arraya]CONCHO-Somebody did hijack Allan’s handle. The Allan I know, knows there is overwhelming, were talking volumes and volumes of evidence linking Iraq to oil. He know’s this because he has read a my posts over the past few years.
The Allan I know, would not resort to partisan knee jerk respones.
The funny thing is, Bushco completely failed at their conspiracy. The “Blood for oil” empire is breaking up.
Obama resides over it’s dissolution.[/quote]
Arraya: You’re as big a killjoy as CONCHO is! I’m trying to get something going here, and resorting to partisan saber rattling is usually the best route, so… C’mon, let me have my fun!
On another note, I just re-read Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer”. It seemed topical, given the present climate. I would have to believe, Arraya, knowing you, that this tome is on your bedside table, but, if it isn’t, it’s worth another read.
Also, check out the movie “Gonzo” about Hunter S. Thompson. I saw it this weekend and I think you’d enjoy it.
Okay, back to trying to get the trolls out from under the bridge.
September 7, 2009 at 9:50 PM #454250Participant[quote=Arraya]CONCHO-Somebody did hijack Allan’s handle. The Allan I know, knows there is overwhelming, were talking volumes and volumes of evidence linking Iraq to oil. He know’s this because he has read a my posts over the past few years.
The Allan I know, would not resort to partisan knee jerk respones.
The funny thing is, Bushco completely failed at their conspiracy. The “Blood for oil” empire is breaking up.
Obama resides over it’s dissolution.[/quote]
Arraya: You’re as big a killjoy as CONCHO is! I’m trying to get something going here, and resorting to partisan saber rattling is usually the best route, so… C’mon, let me have my fun!
On another note, I just re-read Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer”. It seemed topical, given the present climate. I would have to believe, Arraya, knowing you, that this tome is on your bedside table, but, if it isn’t, it’s worth another read.
Also, check out the movie “Gonzo” about Hunter S. Thompson. I saw it this weekend and I think you’d enjoy it.
Okay, back to trying to get the trolls out from under the bridge.
September 7, 2009 at 9:50 PM #454589Participant[quote=Arraya]CONCHO-Somebody did hijack Allan’s handle. The Allan I know, knows there is overwhelming, were talking volumes and volumes of evidence linking Iraq to oil. He know’s this because he has read a my posts over the past few years.
The Allan I know, would not resort to partisan knee jerk respones.
The funny thing is, Bushco completely failed at their conspiracy. The “Blood for oil” empire is breaking up.
Obama resides over it’s dissolution.[/quote]
Arraya: You’re as big a killjoy as CONCHO is! I’m trying to get something going here, and resorting to partisan saber rattling is usually the best route, so… C’mon, let me have my fun!
On another note, I just re-read Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer”. It seemed topical, given the present climate. I would have to believe, Arraya, knowing you, that this tome is on your bedside table, but, if it isn’t, it’s worth another read.
Also, check out the movie “Gonzo” about Hunter S. Thompson. I saw it this weekend and I think you’d enjoy it.
Okay, back to trying to get the trolls out from under the bridge.
September 7, 2009 at 9:50 PM #454662Participant[quote=Arraya]CONCHO-Somebody did hijack Allan’s handle. The Allan I know, knows there is overwhelming, were talking volumes and volumes of evidence linking Iraq to oil. He know’s this because he has read a my posts over the past few years.
The Allan I know, would not resort to partisan knee jerk respones.
The funny thing is, Bushco completely failed at their conspiracy. The “Blood for oil” empire is breaking up.
Obama resides over it’s dissolution.[/quote]
Arraya: You’re as big a killjoy as CONCHO is! I’m trying to get something going here, and resorting to partisan saber rattling is usually the best route, so… C’mon, let me have my fun!
On another note, I just re-read Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer”. It seemed topical, given the present climate. I would have to believe, Arraya, knowing you, that this tome is on your bedside table, but, if it isn’t, it’s worth another read.
Also, check out the movie “Gonzo” about Hunter S. Thompson. I saw it this weekend and I think you’d enjoy it.
Okay, back to trying to get the trolls out from under the bridge.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.