- This topic has 140 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by
Ash Housewares.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 3, 2009 at 11:52 AM #477694November 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM #476863
briansd1
GuestAs a liberal, I hate to say it, but government workers just need to work harder and take on higher work loads, at lower pay, just to keep their jobs.
That’s how it works in the private sector. The same principle should apply to the public sector.
If they don’t like it, they’re welcomed to seek employment elsewhere. Nobody is stopping them.
BTW, I’m a social liberal but not a public employees union supporter.
November 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM #477035briansd1
GuestAs a liberal, I hate to say it, but government workers just need to work harder and take on higher work loads, at lower pay, just to keep their jobs.
That’s how it works in the private sector. The same principle should apply to the public sector.
If they don’t like it, they’re welcomed to seek employment elsewhere. Nobody is stopping them.
BTW, I’m a social liberal but not a public employees union supporter.
November 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM #477400briansd1
GuestAs a liberal, I hate to say it, but government workers just need to work harder and take on higher work loads, at lower pay, just to keep their jobs.
That’s how it works in the private sector. The same principle should apply to the public sector.
If they don’t like it, they’re welcomed to seek employment elsewhere. Nobody is stopping them.
BTW, I’m a social liberal but not a public employees union supporter.
November 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM #477479briansd1
GuestAs a liberal, I hate to say it, but government workers just need to work harder and take on higher work loads, at lower pay, just to keep their jobs.
That’s how it works in the private sector. The same principle should apply to the public sector.
If they don’t like it, they’re welcomed to seek employment elsewhere. Nobody is stopping them.
BTW, I’m a social liberal but not a public employees union supporter.
November 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM #477699briansd1
GuestAs a liberal, I hate to say it, but government workers just need to work harder and take on higher work loads, at lower pay, just to keep their jobs.
That’s how it works in the private sector. The same principle should apply to the public sector.
If they don’t like it, they’re welcomed to seek employment elsewhere. Nobody is stopping them.
BTW, I’m a social liberal but not a public employees union supporter.
November 3, 2009 at 12:31 PM #476878paramount
ParticipantState Employee’s Unions have such a grip on state government that I believe there is little hope for reform.
There may be one ray of hope: If California is declared bankrupt that might break the backs of the State Employee Unions; which in the long run will be best for the state.
November 3, 2009 at 12:31 PM #477050paramount
ParticipantState Employee’s Unions have such a grip on state government that I believe there is little hope for reform.
There may be one ray of hope: If California is declared bankrupt that might break the backs of the State Employee Unions; which in the long run will be best for the state.
November 3, 2009 at 12:31 PM #477416paramount
ParticipantState Employee’s Unions have such a grip on state government that I believe there is little hope for reform.
There may be one ray of hope: If California is declared bankrupt that might break the backs of the State Employee Unions; which in the long run will be best for the state.
November 3, 2009 at 12:31 PM #477495paramount
ParticipantState Employee’s Unions have such a grip on state government that I believe there is little hope for reform.
There may be one ray of hope: If California is declared bankrupt that might break the backs of the State Employee Unions; which in the long run will be best for the state.
November 3, 2009 at 12:31 PM #477714paramount
ParticipantState Employee’s Unions have such a grip on state government that I believe there is little hope for reform.
There may be one ray of hope: If California is declared bankrupt that might break the backs of the State Employee Unions; which in the long run will be best for the state.
November 3, 2009 at 4:17 PM #477017Anonymous
GuestYes Paramount, then all the jobs that were being done by those crook gardeners, sewage public works guys who make those big pay checks (30-50 a year maybe?) can lose their jobs and we can fill them with cheaper labor. who would that be??? hmmm! no private companies wouldn’t use illegal help to lower their cost, would they? Really sick of people scapegoating public workers (I know a few) who do not make these wonderfull paydays that get reported. They are hard workers and their pay is lower then private sector always (for that kook who said they are higher then private jobs, please!) Most public workers are doing things most people would never do (try cleaning up a sewer break at 5 in the morning). Everyone looks at the managment of public workers and what they make but they are not the norm (even then they are still making 10-100 times less than managers in the private sector). So ease up
November 3, 2009 at 4:17 PM #477189Anonymous
GuestYes Paramount, then all the jobs that were being done by those crook gardeners, sewage public works guys who make those big pay checks (30-50 a year maybe?) can lose their jobs and we can fill them with cheaper labor. who would that be??? hmmm! no private companies wouldn’t use illegal help to lower their cost, would they? Really sick of people scapegoating public workers (I know a few) who do not make these wonderfull paydays that get reported. They are hard workers and their pay is lower then private sector always (for that kook who said they are higher then private jobs, please!) Most public workers are doing things most people would never do (try cleaning up a sewer break at 5 in the morning). Everyone looks at the managment of public workers and what they make but they are not the norm (even then they are still making 10-100 times less than managers in the private sector). So ease up
November 3, 2009 at 4:17 PM #477553Anonymous
GuestYes Paramount, then all the jobs that were being done by those crook gardeners, sewage public works guys who make those big pay checks (30-50 a year maybe?) can lose their jobs and we can fill them with cheaper labor. who would that be??? hmmm! no private companies wouldn’t use illegal help to lower their cost, would they? Really sick of people scapegoating public workers (I know a few) who do not make these wonderfull paydays that get reported. They are hard workers and their pay is lower then private sector always (for that kook who said they are higher then private jobs, please!) Most public workers are doing things most people would never do (try cleaning up a sewer break at 5 in the morning). Everyone looks at the managment of public workers and what they make but they are not the norm (even then they are still making 10-100 times less than managers in the private sector). So ease up
November 3, 2009 at 4:17 PM #477633Anonymous
GuestYes Paramount, then all the jobs that were being done by those crook gardeners, sewage public works guys who make those big pay checks (30-50 a year maybe?) can lose their jobs and we can fill them with cheaper labor. who would that be??? hmmm! no private companies wouldn’t use illegal help to lower their cost, would they? Really sick of people scapegoating public workers (I know a few) who do not make these wonderfull paydays that get reported. They are hard workers and their pay is lower then private sector always (for that kook who said they are higher then private jobs, please!) Most public workers are doing things most people would never do (try cleaning up a sewer break at 5 in the morning). Everyone looks at the managment of public workers and what they make but they are not the norm (even then they are still making 10-100 times less than managers in the private sector). So ease up
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.