- This topic has 100 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 15, 2010 at 12:48 PM #526969March 15, 2010 at 2:29 PM #526057
socrattt
ParticipantWe taken a few words off the end of America’s motto:
“Home of the FREE”
March 15, 2010 at 2:29 PM #526189socrattt
ParticipantWe taken a few words off the end of America’s motto:
“Home of the FREE”
March 15, 2010 at 2:29 PM #526635socrattt
ParticipantWe taken a few words off the end of America’s motto:
“Home of the FREE”
March 15, 2010 at 2:29 PM #526732socrattt
ParticipantWe taken a few words off the end of America’s motto:
“Home of the FREE”
March 15, 2010 at 2:29 PM #526989socrattt
ParticipantWe taken a few words off the end of America’s motto:
“Home of the FREE”
March 15, 2010 at 2:57 PM #526077waiting hawk
ParticipantThe crash was heading right as we saw it back a few years ago. I never thought government action would have ANY effect but I was wrong. Can they keep it up is a whole nother issue.
March 15, 2010 at 2:57 PM #526209waiting hawk
ParticipantThe crash was heading right as we saw it back a few years ago. I never thought government action would have ANY effect but I was wrong. Can they keep it up is a whole nother issue.
March 15, 2010 at 2:57 PM #526655waiting hawk
ParticipantThe crash was heading right as we saw it back a few years ago. I never thought government action would have ANY effect but I was wrong. Can they keep it up is a whole nother issue.
March 15, 2010 at 2:57 PM #526752waiting hawk
ParticipantThe crash was heading right as we saw it back a few years ago. I never thought government action would have ANY effect but I was wrong. Can they keep it up is a whole nother issue.
March 15, 2010 at 2:57 PM #527010waiting hawk
ParticipantThe crash was heading right as we saw it back a few years ago. I never thought government action would have ANY effect but I was wrong. Can they keep it up is a whole nother issue.
March 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM #526097XBoxBoy
ParticipantNot sure what to think of this issue. Yes, it definitely needs to be fair, ie all companies have the same chance. And I’m not convinced that recouping already paid money is fair at all. (More supportive of the idea that you can carry your losses forward, but not claw back previous payments)
I’m definitely sympathetic though to the idea that a company that has ups and downs should be able to spread it’s costs and losses over multiple years. I work in an industry where you have expenses and costs for years then 90% of your revenue in a couple of months. Taxes on this kind of business model are really lousy and I don’t see any reason that such a business model should be discouraged by the taxman.
XBoxBoy
March 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM #526229XBoxBoy
ParticipantNot sure what to think of this issue. Yes, it definitely needs to be fair, ie all companies have the same chance. And I’m not convinced that recouping already paid money is fair at all. (More supportive of the idea that you can carry your losses forward, but not claw back previous payments)
I’m definitely sympathetic though to the idea that a company that has ups and downs should be able to spread it’s costs and losses over multiple years. I work in an industry where you have expenses and costs for years then 90% of your revenue in a couple of months. Taxes on this kind of business model are really lousy and I don’t see any reason that such a business model should be discouraged by the taxman.
XBoxBoy
March 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM #526675XBoxBoy
ParticipantNot sure what to think of this issue. Yes, it definitely needs to be fair, ie all companies have the same chance. And I’m not convinced that recouping already paid money is fair at all. (More supportive of the idea that you can carry your losses forward, but not claw back previous payments)
I’m definitely sympathetic though to the idea that a company that has ups and downs should be able to spread it’s costs and losses over multiple years. I work in an industry where you have expenses and costs for years then 90% of your revenue in a couple of months. Taxes on this kind of business model are really lousy and I don’t see any reason that such a business model should be discouraged by the taxman.
XBoxBoy
March 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM #526772XBoxBoy
ParticipantNot sure what to think of this issue. Yes, it definitely needs to be fair, ie all companies have the same chance. And I’m not convinced that recouping already paid money is fair at all. (More supportive of the idea that you can carry your losses forward, but not claw back previous payments)
I’m definitely sympathetic though to the idea that a company that has ups and downs should be able to spread it’s costs and losses over multiple years. I work in an industry where you have expenses and costs for years then 90% of your revenue in a couple of months. Taxes on this kind of business model are really lousy and I don’t see any reason that such a business model should be discouraged by the taxman.
XBoxBoy
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.