- This topic has 40 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by dejams.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 24, 2008 at 10:07 AM #175714March 24, 2008 at 11:33 AM #175780sdrealtorParticipant
Ray
Is age of home important?
Lot size?
Garage (2 or 3)FWIW, based upon what info I have so far and what you are looking for I dont think it would be unreasonable to expect to find an older home of that size with a decent lot/location in 200/sf range that needs some remodeling. In the newer tracts (1997 on), I think $250/sf will be a more realistic expectation and within reason.
March 24, 2008 at 11:33 AM #175880sdrealtorParticipantRay
Is age of home important?
Lot size?
Garage (2 or 3)FWIW, based upon what info I have so far and what you are looking for I dont think it would be unreasonable to expect to find an older home of that size with a decent lot/location in 200/sf range that needs some remodeling. In the newer tracts (1997 on), I think $250/sf will be a more realistic expectation and within reason.
March 24, 2008 at 11:33 AM #175790sdrealtorParticipantRay
Is age of home important?
Lot size?
Garage (2 or 3)FWIW, based upon what info I have so far and what you are looking for I dont think it would be unreasonable to expect to find an older home of that size with a decent lot/location in 200/sf range that needs some remodeling. In the newer tracts (1997 on), I think $250/sf will be a more realistic expectation and within reason.
March 24, 2008 at 11:33 AM #175787sdrealtorParticipantRay
Is age of home important?
Lot size?
Garage (2 or 3)FWIW, based upon what info I have so far and what you are looking for I dont think it would be unreasonable to expect to find an older home of that size with a decent lot/location in 200/sf range that needs some remodeling. In the newer tracts (1997 on), I think $250/sf will be a more realistic expectation and within reason.
March 24, 2008 at 11:33 AM #175431sdrealtorParticipantRay
Is age of home important?
Lot size?
Garage (2 or 3)FWIW, based upon what info I have so far and what you are looking for I dont think it would be unreasonable to expect to find an older home of that size with a decent lot/location in 200/sf range that needs some remodeling. In the newer tracts (1997 on), I think $250/sf will be a more realistic expectation and within reason.
March 24, 2008 at 4:42 PM #175670dejamsParticipantSDRealtor,
Thanks for the info. It looks like the price needs to come down a little more before I would consider this sub. The current price is 247-327 sqft which is a wide range. I would like to see the medium range in 250 but that properly won’t happen anytime soon since most of these sellers do not have toxic mortgage. Definitely a nice area but get in and out can be a challenge during rush hour. What is the best local route commuting from 163/Balboa to this area without using the 5?
March 24, 2008 at 4:42 PM #176021dejamsParticipantSDRealtor,
Thanks for the info. It looks like the price needs to come down a little more before I would consider this sub. The current price is 247-327 sqft which is a wide range. I would like to see the medium range in 250 but that properly won’t happen anytime soon since most of these sellers do not have toxic mortgage. Definitely a nice area but get in and out can be a challenge during rush hour. What is the best local route commuting from 163/Balboa to this area without using the 5?
March 24, 2008 at 4:42 PM #176025dejamsParticipantSDRealtor,
Thanks for the info. It looks like the price needs to come down a little more before I would consider this sub. The current price is 247-327 sqft which is a wide range. I would like to see the medium range in 250 but that properly won’t happen anytime soon since most of these sellers do not have toxic mortgage. Definitely a nice area but get in and out can be a challenge during rush hour. What is the best local route commuting from 163/Balboa to this area without using the 5?
March 24, 2008 at 4:42 PM #176029dejamsParticipantSDRealtor,
Thanks for the info. It looks like the price needs to come down a little more before I would consider this sub. The current price is 247-327 sqft which is a wide range. I would like to see the medium range in 250 but that properly won’t happen anytime soon since most of these sellers do not have toxic mortgage. Definitely a nice area but get in and out can be a challenge during rush hour. What is the best local route commuting from 163/Balboa to this area without using the 5?
March 24, 2008 at 4:42 PM #176122dejamsParticipantSDRealtor,
Thanks for the info. It looks like the price needs to come down a little more before I would consider this sub. The current price is 247-327 sqft which is a wide range. I would like to see the medium range in 250 but that properly won’t happen anytime soon since most of these sellers do not have toxic mortgage. Definitely a nice area but get in and out can be a challenge during rush hour. What is the best local route commuting from 163/Balboa to this area without using the 5?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.