Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Another crash in 2012? Any thoughts?
- This topic has 91 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 11 months ago by paramount.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 12, 2012 at 11:57 PM #735776January 12, 2012 at 11:59 PM #735777paramountParticipant
CAR: Sorry, no not you – that was a comment from Howard Jarvis.
January 13, 2012 at 2:06 AM #735779CA renterParticipantOkay, I’m sorry for going off on you like that, paramount.
January 13, 2012 at 4:58 AM #735780AnonymousGuest[quote=CA renter]Once again, when somebody presents facts that you don’t like, you counter with…another personal attack.[/quote]
Speaking of facts, you still have not provided any to support your “Wall Street stole the pensions” argument.
Where are the details of your solution?
We are still waiting for a list of names and net worth values that will cover the shortfall.
I’ve got my pitchfork in hand, now tell me who to go after.
In the meantime, the shortfall is still there, and the taxpayers are still on the hook…
January 13, 2012 at 7:42 AM #735783(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI haven’t read this entire thread (frankly, I can’t bear to read the longer posts, so I skim them and read responses).
But, what I want to knwo it, how the heck did we go from the question of whether the stock markket will crash in 2012 to a pissing contest about public employees.
Maybe we should creat a separate thread for that subject ?
January 13, 2012 at 8:11 AM #735785CA renterParticipant[quote=pri_dk][quote=CA renter]Once again, when somebody presents facts that you don’t like, you counter with…another personal attack.[/quote]
Speaking of facts, you still have not provided any to support your “Wall Street stole the pensions” argument.
Where are the details of your solution?
We are still waiting for a list of names and net worth values that will cover the shortfall.
I’ve got my pitchfork in hand, now tell me who to go after.
In the meantime, the shortfall is still there, and the taxpayers are still on the hook…[/quote]
Scroll up…
January 13, 2012 at 9:51 AM #735795sdrealtorParticipantYou mean this guy?
In an interview, Herb Sandler said the couple plans to give all their money away through a foundation that that they set up years ago.
January 13, 2012 at 10:41 AM #735799briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk]
Speaking of facts, you still have not provided any to support your “Wall Street stole the pensions” argument.
Where are the details of your solution?
We are still waiting for a list of names and net worth values that will cover the shortfall.
I’ve got my pitchfork in hand, now tell me who to go after.
In the meantime, the shortfall is still there, and the taxpayers are still on the hook…[/quote]
The pensions went “poof! just like that” along with some other great Wall Street fortunes.
CA renter really needs to accept that the pensions evaporated with the economic crash. There is nowhere to get that money from but from an economic rebound and recovery in asset prices, or higher taxes on everybody.
January 13, 2012 at 2:24 PM #735819AnonymousGuestI apologize for contributing to the thread drift.
Will move it to the other thread, where we shall continue to wait for the list…
January 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM #735855ArrayaParticipant[quote=briansd1]
CA renter really needs to accept that the pensions evaporated with the economic crash. There is nowhere to get that money from but from an economic rebound and recovery in asset prices, or higher taxes on everybody.[/quote]
Yes and deflation would obliterate those pensions.
January 13, 2012 at 10:44 PM #735862briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya][quote=briansd1]
CA renter really needs to accept that the pensions evaporated with the economic crash. There is nowhere to get that money from but from an economic rebound and recovery in asset prices, or higher taxes on everybody.[/quote]
Yes and deflation would obliterate those pensions.[/quote]
That’s why I find her positions extremely selfish and self-centered.
She wants an economic crash and deflation for everybody. But she wants employment contracts to protect public salaries and pensions at peak levels, no matter what the economic conditions are.
She recognizes the majority of pension funds’ assets were based on Wall Street investment returns. But then those asset values went poof with the financial crisis. Now she wants the taxpayers to make up the loss pension fund values.
As pri_dk pointed out, seizing the money of bankers will only make up a small amount of the pension funds’ shortfall.
January 14, 2012 at 12:32 AM #735871AecetiaParticipantLooks like the Euro is going down:
“PARIS – The eurozone economy plunged back into crisis on Friday as France and Austria were stripped of their top triple-A credit ratings and Standard and Poor’s downgraded a swathe of debt-laden EU members. Only Germany escaped unscathed, as all other eurozone members were either downgraded — some by two notches — or else warned their current ratings were being re-examined amid fears about sovereign deficits.”http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/business/01/14/12/euro-crisis-deepens-ratings-agency-strikes
January 14, 2012 at 3:43 AM #735874CA renterParticipant[quote=briansd1][quote=Arraya][quote=briansd1]
CA renter really needs to accept that the pensions evaporated with the economic crash. There is nowhere to get that money from but from an economic rebound and recovery in asset prices, or higher taxes on everybody.[/quote]
Yes and deflation would obliterate those pensions.[/quote]
That’s why I find her positions extremely selfish and self-centered.
She wants an economic crash and deflation for everybody. But she wants employment contracts to protect public salaries and pensions at peak levels, no matter what the economic conditions are.
She recognizes the majority of pension funds’ assets were based on Wall Street investment returns. But then those asset values went poof with the financial crisis. Now she wants the taxpayers to make up the loss pension fund values.
As pri_dk pointed out, seizing the money of bankers will only make up a small amount of the pension funds’ shortfall.[/quote]
Brian,
I’ve said **multiple** times that I favor deflation and would gladly roll back public employee compensation to pre-bubble levels (mid-90s? mid-70s?) as long as **everyone** takes the hit together — including those who own assets.
Compensation for public employees is ALREADY down from peak levels, as I’ve mentioned many times before. Where did I say it was at peak levels and shouldn’t change?
Not only that, but I’ve stated **multiple** times that I disagreed with the pension boost passed during the dot-com era when pension funds were overfunded and disagreed when public agencies stopped paying into their employees’ retirement accounts (pension contribution holidays should never have happened).
Additionally, I’ve always said that public employees should (and will) end up paying far more toward their retirement accounts.
If you can show that I’ve said otherwise, please link to my post(s). Until then, stop putting words in my mouth.
What I HAVE said is that those who created our financial mess should take the first hit. I’ve never wavered on that, and I never will.
January 14, 2012 at 7:32 AM #735881CoronitaParticipant(begin rant)
———————————————-How the hell did a thread about what the markets would do this year turn into a pissing match about government worker pensions?
You know, I wish I could open up this thread, and some person or people would have said “hey, FLU, I invested in XYZ and think it’s going to make a killing”… “Or hey, folks, I made this thing, and check it out. It’s going to be the next big thing…Wanna invest?
Then I would look at it, think about it, and hell, might even take a chance on it”… Yes, yes, some of you folks pinged me before, but come on, I was getting fvcking medial treatment, it was the last thing on my mind at the time…Now that things really aren’t going to be known in the near term, I’m like screw the medical treatment crap…and move on….(end rant)
……Would you folks quit complaining about everything and tell me how to put more money in my wallet?
I have a few suggestions as topics for discussion…..
1)How can one cheat on your taxes legally?
2)How can I sit on my fat lazy butt and make 1 million dollars in 1 week without doing anything (that includes applying for a government job)…Hell, if I’m going to be lazy, might as well go all out and be lazy.
3)When do you think we will see 0% financing on a home loan?
4)How can I take advantage of the foreclosures that are suppose to be soon to be released by Freddie and Fannie?
5)With the new domain name registration opening up,
http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120114/business/701149965/do you think one can make a lot of money being a cyber squatter on names like “.fvck” ,”.sex”, “.bxxxjob”, etc,etc,etc,etc. for instance, if I have the .fvck suffix, would it be profitable that I could then have companies register a domain name like “www.iliketo.fvck”, “www.youliketo.fvck”, or “www.everyonelikes.sex”???
6)If the euro comes crashing down, and the USD gets trashed, do you think gold/silver/precious metals price will go up or down?
7)Do you think sin stock is the way to go? PM is at a all time high. Monsanto is holding very well. What else evil vice stock, morales asside, do you think will do good in 2012?
Sorry folks… I’m really desperate here. I need to make a gillion dollars very soon without really working, and you folks aren’t helping me at all….
And remember, the greatest accomplishments and successes in wealth in america was motivated by greed+laziness.
Thank you…
——- 🙂(btw, I’m kidding…sort of)
January 14, 2012 at 8:00 AM #735882AnonymousGuestflu,
I’d love to help you out – not because I’m nice guy – but, because if I had the answers you are looking for, I’d certainly use them myself.
The reason the topic of market predictions doesn’t really interest me is because I have become a very firm believer in a very basic principle. I can’t remember where I first heard it, but it tells me almost everything I need to know:
“The small investor is not rewarded for extra effort.”
I pay careful attention to my personal finances and investments (in fact it’s essentially my “job” these days), but I also accept that there is only so much the little guy can know, and there’s really no benefit from pouring over details, trying to spot the next “fad,” timing the market, etc.
Essentially, I believe in the Efficient Market Hypothesis and try to act on that belief as best I can.
Of course there is an obvious contradiction here: I’m also a Pigg and know that markets don’t always behave rationally or efficiently. Knowledge of this sort should influence any investor’s decisions, but it’s only useful for somewhat long-term time frames, and once you know the basics (e.g. “housing is historically overvalued right now”), there’s no need to agonize over the details.
I’ve also learned that it’s impossible to time the market, even using the “coarse-grained” time-frame of a year. Nobody can answer questions like “will there be a crash in 2012?” (However, many will make this type of prediction, and some will get lucky – be careful about believing that the “lucky monkey” has some sort of “skill”)
The only questions that we have a chance of answering with any certainty is “what asset classes are over/under valued right now?” Fairly boring and generally easy to answer stuff.
So I can’t help you get rich quick. All I can recommend is to do fundamental/historical analysis like Rich does (or just let him manage some of your money) and be patient.
Or just put it all on red…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.