- This topic has 20 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by
Peace.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2007 at 10:50 AM #10866November 9, 2007 at 11:16 AM #97721
Eugene
ParticipantIt’s very unlikely to make it all the way through in its present form.
November 9, 2007 at 11:16 AM #97786Eugene
ParticipantIt’s very unlikely to make it all the way through in its present form.
November 9, 2007 at 11:16 AM #97791Eugene
ParticipantIt’s very unlikely to make it all the way through in its present form.
November 9, 2007 at 11:16 AM #97801Eugene
ParticipantIt’s very unlikely to make it all the way through in its present form.
November 9, 2007 at 12:26 PM #97810Peace
ParticipantI think the final bill was a bi-partisan compromise and the legislators know that there are going to be a LOT of pissed off constituents if something isn’t done.
We were first hit with the AMT in 1987 – it was so unheard of that our accountant wasn’t even aware of it (got a bill + penalty later). I think I saw that it would affect 21 million people this year.
November 9, 2007 at 12:26 PM #97817Peace
ParticipantI think the final bill was a bi-partisan compromise and the legislators know that there are going to be a LOT of pissed off constituents if something isn’t done.
We were first hit with the AMT in 1987 – it was so unheard of that our accountant wasn’t even aware of it (got a bill + penalty later). I think I saw that it would affect 21 million people this year.
November 9, 2007 at 12:26 PM #97802Peace
ParticipantI think the final bill was a bi-partisan compromise and the legislators know that there are going to be a LOT of pissed off constituents if something isn’t done.
We were first hit with the AMT in 1987 – it was so unheard of that our accountant wasn’t even aware of it (got a bill + penalty later). I think I saw that it would affect 21 million people this year.
November 9, 2007 at 12:26 PM #97736Peace
ParticipantI think the final bill was a bi-partisan compromise and the legislators know that there are going to be a LOT of pissed off constituents if something isn’t done.
We were first hit with the AMT in 1987 – it was so unheard of that our accountant wasn’t even aware of it (got a bill + penalty later). I think I saw that it would affect 21 million people this year.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97771drunkle
Participanthey, look at me, i’m a single individual with no home, no personal business, no kids, no nothing, a higher than median income and i already pay the maximum in taxes. i don’t know how to game the tax code, i’m an idiot.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97836drunkle
Participanthey, look at me, i’m a single individual with no home, no personal business, no kids, no nothing, a higher than median income and i already pay the maximum in taxes. i don’t know how to game the tax code, i’m an idiot.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97843drunkle
Participanthey, look at me, i’m a single individual with no home, no personal business, no kids, no nothing, a higher than median income and i already pay the maximum in taxes. i don’t know how to game the tax code, i’m an idiot.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97854drunkle
Participanthey, look at me, i’m a single individual with no home, no personal business, no kids, no nothing, a higher than median income and i already pay the maximum in taxes. i don’t know how to game the tax code, i’m an idiot.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97777Eugene
ParticipantIt’s anything but a bi-partisan compromise. Not a single Republican voted for it. Even if it gets through the Senate, Bush will veto it and Democrats don’t have Republican support to override the veto.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97842Eugene
ParticipantIt’s anything but a bi-partisan compromise. Not a single Republican voted for it. Even if it gets through the Senate, Bush will veto it and Democrats don’t have Republican support to override the veto.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.